Bibliography
- Life360: Usability of Mobile Devices for Time Use Surveys; 2010; Lai, J. W., Vanno, L., Link, M. W., Pearson, J., Makowska, H., Benezra, K., Green, M.
- The Growth of Internet Research Methods and the Reluctant Sociologist; 2010; Farrell, D., Petersen, J. C.
- Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review; 2010; Fan, W., Yan, Z.
- Advanced Methods for Conducting Online Behavioral Research; 2010; Gosling, S. D., Johnson, A. J.
- Web-Based Survey of US Health Educators: Challenges and Lessons; 2010; Chen, L.-S., Goodson, P.
- The big picture: what the decline of fixed line telephones will mean to mobile research; 2010; Windle, R.
- Capturing situations and context in mobile surveys. Reducing the recall and the out of context problem...; 2010; Tjostheim, I.
- The Future for Mobile Research: what will the landscape look like in two years time; 2010; Rolfe, G.
- Psychological aspects of interviewing by cellular telephone; 2010; Döring, N.
- Visual design in online surveys: Lessons for the mobile world; 2010; Couper, M. P.
- Respondent-Oriented Interaction Design Reduces Item Nonresponse in Internet Surveys; 2009; Kaczmirek, L.
- Who Chooses the Web Option?; 2009; O'Hare, B. C., Gentry, R. J.
- Priming Web Survey Respondents with Location-Specific Graphics: Effects on Customer Survey Scores and...; 2009; Cardador, J.
- Estimating Local Phone Service Percentages: How to Weight the Data from a Local, Dual-Frame Sample Survey...; 2009; Guterbock, T. M.
- Mitofsky-Waksberg Sampling of Cell Phone Numbers; 2009; Brown, J., ZuWallack, R. S.
- Exploring the Overlap Domain in a National Dual-Frame (Cell/Landline) Telephone Survey: Results from...; 2009; Lohr, S. L., Grandjean, B. D., Taylor, P. A.
- Wireless and Wireline: Dual Frame Implications for Sample Design Decisions on Estimates, Weighting and...; 2009; Benford, R., Tompson, T., Feinberg, B., Feinberg, G., Weber, A., Speulda, N., Fleury, C.
- Wireless Telephone Sharing: Household Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey; 2009; Blumberg, S. J. Luke, J. V.
- Cell Phones: The Key to Including the Full Population?; 2009; Frankel, M. R., Battaglia, M. P., Balluz, L. S.
- Timing and Amount of Incentives: Implications for Enhancing Survey Participation and Encouraging Web...; 2009; Ciemnecki, A., Heaviside, S., Barrett, K., Mooney, G., Jang, D., Kang, K. H.
- Who Needs RDD? (Part II): An Assessment of Coverage Bias in Dual-Frame Designs That Combine Directory...; 2009; Ellis, J, M., Guterbock, T. M., Diop, A., Holmes, J. L. P., Le, T. K.
- Results of Mailing Experiments Aimed at Maximizing Self- Administered Web Participation; 2009; Franklin, J.
- Producing Straightlining and Item Non-Differentiation in a Web Survey: How Visual Design Plays a Role...; 2009; Callegaro, M., Shand-Lubbers, J., Dennis, J. M.
- New Media Use, Political Sophistication and Cell-Phone Surveys; 2009; Goidel, R. K., Kenny, C., Xenos, M. A.
- Comparative Analysis of Gender and Age in the Cell-Only and Landline Samples of the 2008 Iowa Behavioral...; 2009; Bonsall Hoekstra, A., Losch, M. E., Lutz, G. M.
Bibliography
One of the challenges in business surveys is to achieve sufficiently high response rates at reasonable cost. High response rates not only increase the number of cases available for analysis, but also provide some insurance against nonresponse bias. A response rate is typically defined as the number of completed surveys divided by the total number of sample cases (including partial surveys, but excluding ineligibles).
Because some respondents quit the survey before it is finished (“partial interviews”), one strategy to increase the response rate is to convert partial interviews to complete interviews. This also makes good sense from a cost perspective since drawing in new respondents is often more difficult (and costly) than keeping respondents going.
This presentation discusses some strategies to minimize the relative number of partial surveys. More specifically, the effects of questionnaire design will be discussed in light of “human computer interaction” (“usability”). The main thesis is that good design leads to higher quality responses and to more completed (and less partial) surveys. We will discuss “Internet survey paradata”. This is a tool that enables researchers to detect design problems and to optimize the design of the survey instrument. A number of design issues, such as progress indicators and error messages, will be discussed from the perspective of paradata.

New on bottom