Bibliography
- Life360: Usability of Mobile Devices for Time Use Surveys; 2010; Lai, J. W., Vanno, L., Link, M. W., Pearson, J., Makowska, H., Benezra, K., Green, M.
- The Growth of Internet Research Methods and the Reluctant Sociologist; 2010; Farrell, D., Petersen, J. C.
- Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review; 2010; Fan, W., Yan, Z.
- Advanced Methods for Conducting Online Behavioral Research; 2010; Gosling, S. D., Johnson, A. J.
- Web-Based Survey of US Health Educators: Challenges and Lessons; 2010; Chen, L.-S., Goodson, P.
- The big picture: what the decline of fixed line telephones will mean to mobile research; 2010; Windle, R.
- Capturing situations and context in mobile surveys. Reducing the recall and the out of context problem...; 2010; Tjostheim, I.
- The Future for Mobile Research: what will the landscape look like in two years time; 2010; Rolfe, G.
- Psychological aspects of interviewing by cellular telephone; 2010; Döring, N.
- Visual design in online surveys: Lessons for the mobile world; 2010; Couper, M. P.
- Das Antwortverhalten bei unterschiedlichen Erhebungsmethoden: Face to Face- vs. Online-Befragung; 2009; Hölscher, V.
- Die Web-Befragung als Methode: Vorteile bei sozialer Erwünschtheit, Nachteile bei sozialer Entkontextualisierung...; 2009; Taddicken, M.
- Maßnahmen zur Steigerung der Responserate bei listenbasierten Stichproben in Webbefragungen; 2009; Keusch, F.
- Online-Tests als Entscheidungshilfe für das Verpackungs-Design bei Lebensmitteln; 2009; Froböse, M.
- Indikatoren und Erfolgsfaktoren von Online-Befragungen; 2009; Knijff, M.
- Online-Befragung von Call center Agents: Ein Best Practice-Beispiel zu einer online-gestützten Mitarbeiterbefragung...; 2009; König, V.
- Potenzial selbstadministrierter mobiler Befragungen: Erfahrungen aus einer empirischen Studienreihe; 2009; Bosnjak, M.
- Cell Phone Mainly Households: Coverage and Reach for Telephone Surveys Using RDD Landline Samples; 2009; Boyle, J., Lewis, F., Tefft, B.
- Cell-Phone-Only Voters in the 2008 Exit Poll and Implications for Future Noncoverage Bias ; 2009; Mokrzycki, M., Keeter, S., Kennedy, C.
- Zero Banks: Coverage Error and Bias in Rdd Samples Based on Hundred Banks with Listed Numbers ; 2009; Boyle, J., Bucuvalas, M., Piekarski, L., Weiss, A.
- National Surveys Via RDD Telephone Interviewing vs. the Internet: Comparing Sample Representativeness...; 2009; Chang, L. C., Krosnick, J. A.
- Internet experiments: methods, guidelines, metadata; 2009; Reips, U. -D.
- Twisting rating scales in Web surveys: Slider scales versus categorical scales of horizontal versus...; 2009; Funke, F. Reips, U. -D. Thomas, R. K.
- Semantic differentials made from visual analogue scales: Expanding the survey designer's menu; 2009; Funke, F., Reips, U. -D.
- Making small effects observable: Reducing error by using visual analogue scales; 2009; Funke, F., Reips, U. -D.
Bibliography
One of the challenges in business surveys is to achieve sufficiently high response rates at reasonable cost. High response rates not only increase the number of cases available for analysis, but also provide some insurance against nonresponse bias. A response rate is typically defined as the number of completed surveys divided by the total number of sample cases (including partial surveys, but excluding ineligibles).
Because some respondents quit the survey before it is finished (“partial interviews”), one strategy to increase the response rate is to convert partial interviews to complete interviews. This also makes good sense from a cost perspective since drawing in new respondents is often more difficult (and costly) than keeping respondents going.
This presentation discusses some strategies to minimize the relative number of partial surveys. More specifically, the effects of questionnaire design will be discussed in light of “human computer interaction” (“usability”). The main thesis is that good design leads to higher quality responses and to more completed (and less partial) surveys. We will discuss “Internet survey paradata”. This is a tool that enables researchers to detect design problems and to optimize the design of the survey instrument. A number of design issues, such as progress indicators and error messages, will be discussed from the perspective of paradata.

New on bottom