Web Survey Bibliography
Title E-mail and mixed mode database surveys revisited: Exploratory analyses of factors affecting response rates
Author Roy, A., Berger, P. D.
Source Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management , 12, 2, pp. 153-171
Year 2005
Database Ingenta Select
Access date 25.07.2005
Abstract Two studies were conducted to test for factors affecting the overall response rates of e-mail and mixed-mode surveys. The surveys were directed at association executives who were asked to respond about the characteristics of their associations and their members.
The first study was international, involving association executives from six continents and 29 countries. It showed that the response rates were poor overall, with 'undeliverable' addresses as a potential problem. This global sampling frame was found to be unfeasible, given the very low response rates from association executives in most countries.
The subsequent study used a mixed mode approach and focused on executives within just the USA. The data collection process was specifically designed, in part, to enable certain comparisons among different e-mail survey options (eg degree of personalisation), as well as the core comparison of e-mail versus regular mail, with respect to response rates and other items of interest. Specifically, the authors found the response rate to be much higher for surveys mailed (versus e- mailed) to informants. Lottery incentives did not increase response rates for e-mail surveys. Only a small percentage (2.2 per cent) of informants who were mailed the 'paper' version of the questionnaire chose to fill it in online. On the other hand, none of the informants receiving the e-mail version of the questionnaire asked for the paper version.
There was no significant difference between the response rate for embedded versus attached e-mails; there was a marginally significant increase in response rate for personalised e-mails over that for non-personalised e-mail solicitations. Finally, the implications of these findings for using e-mail and mixed mode methodologies are addressed.
The first study was international, involving association executives from six continents and 29 countries. It showed that the response rates were poor overall, with 'undeliverable' addresses as a potential problem. This global sampling frame was found to be unfeasible, given the very low response rates from association executives in most countries.
The subsequent study used a mixed mode approach and focused on executives within just the USA. The data collection process was specifically designed, in part, to enable certain comparisons among different e-mail survey options (eg degree of personalisation), as well as the core comparison of e-mail versus regular mail, with respect to response rates and other items of interest. Specifically, the authors found the response rate to be much higher for surveys mailed (versus e- mailed) to informants. Lottery incentives did not increase response rates for e-mail surveys. Only a small percentage (2.2 per cent) of informants who were mailed the 'paper' version of the questionnaire chose to fill it in online. On the other hand, none of the informants receiving the e-mail version of the questionnaire asked for the paper version.
There was no significant difference between the response rate for embedded versus attached e-mails; there was a marginally significant increase in response rate for personalised e-mails over that for non-personalised e-mail solicitations. Finally, the implications of these findings for using e-mail and mixed mode methodologies are addressed.
Access/Direct link Database (abstract)
Year of publication2005
Bibliographic typeJournal article
Web Survey Bibliography - Research on Internet (644)
- A usability of a new graphical shopping interface through GlobalPark; 2009; Groenen, P. J. F., Kagie, M.
- Effects of data collection technique on the quality of data: A MTMM study of CATI, CAPI and Online interviews...; 2009; Scherpenzeel, A.
- Effectiveness of incentives in mixed-mode systems: An evaluation of errors & costs; 2009; Vehovar, V.; Lozar Manfreda, K.; Berzelak, N.
- Web-based measurement: Effect of completing single or multiple items per webpage; 2009; Thorndike, F. P., Carlbring, P., Smyth, F. L., Magee, J. C., Gonder-Frederick, L., Ost, L. G., Ritterband...
- Mobile phone surveys in mixed mode environment; 2009; Vehovar, V.
- Usability testing; 2008; Roe, D. J.
- Foundation of quality project overview; 2008
- Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites; 2008; Hargittai, E.
- ‘Looking at’, ‘Looking up’ or ‘Keeping up with’ People? Motives...; 2008; Joinson, A. N.
- Objectivity, Reliability, and Validity of Search Engine Count Estimates ; 2008; Janetzko, D.
- More than the digital divide?: Investigating the differences between Internet and non-Internet users; 2008; Zhang, C., Callegaro, M., Thomas, M.
- Internet dating: a British survey; 2008; Gunter, B.
- Social Web Data as a Source for Social Science Research. The Example of a German Online Dating Website...; 2008; Skopek, J., Schmitz, A.
- Use of the Internet as a data collection tool: a methodological investigation of online synchronous...; 2008; Evans, A. R., Elford, J., Wiggins, D.
- The Role of Cash Incentives in Online Panelist Motivations: Experimental Results on Unit Response and...; 2008; Taylor, E.
- Predictors and Barriers to Collecting Data from Early Childhood Educators Using the Web; 2008; Caspe, M., Sonnenfeld, K., Meagher, C., Sprachman, S., Scaturro, G.
- Internet Surveys: Can Statistical Adjustments Eliminate Coverage Bias?; 2008; Dever, J. A., Rafferty, A., Valliant, R. L.
- Eliciting Subjective Expectations in Internet Surveys ; 2008; Delavande, A., Rohwedder, S.
- Internet Research: Developments, problems, and potential; 2008; Welker, M., Matzat, U.
- Response Non-Differentiation and Response Styles in Web-Based Studies: Causes and Consequences ; 2008; Frisina, L. T., Thomas, R. K.
- Cost efficiency in a mixed-mode survey – The Norwegian Rent Marked Survey; 2008; Lagerstrom, B. O.
- Analyzing Social Networks via the Internet; 2008; Hogan, B.
- The effects of incentives in internet panels: a review; 2008; Goeritz, A.
- Asking the age question in mail and online surveys; 2008; Gendall, P., Healey, B.
- Whither statistical metadata?; 2007; Westlake, A.
- Web survey design; 2007; Ma, Q., McCord, M.
- Utility and happiness; 2007; Kimball, M. S., Willis, R.
- The Internet audience. Constitution & measurement; 2007; Bermejo, F.
- Sampling for web surveys; 2007; Rivers, D.
- Research Operations at Yahoo! - transformation of Web interview capabilities; 2007; Cohen, A.
- Reconstructing childhood health histories using internet panels; 2007; Smith, J. P.
- Online market research, 5th Edition; 2007; Comley, P.
- IMRO guidelines for best practices in online sample and panel management; 2007
- Developments in electronic survey design for establishment surveys; 2007; O'Neill, G.
- The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students' use of online...; 2007; Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.
- Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace ; 2007; Dwyer, R., Passerini , K., Hiltz, S. R.
- Online research ethics; 2007; Madge, C.
- Crypto law survey; 2007; Koops, B. -J.
- Context effects in Internet Surveys: New issues and evidence; 2007; D. Dillman, D. A., Christian, L. M., Smith, A.Smyth, J. D.
- Technical considerations when implementing online research; 2007; Schmidt, W. C.
- Using online panels in psychological research; 2007; Goeritz, A.
- The Online Measurement of Ego Centered Online Social Networks; 2007; Matzat, U., Snijders, C.
- Using user feedback: Redesigning the "Survey of Industrial production"; 2007; Conrad, A.
- Web Panels: The Future of Survey Research?; 2007; Krotki, K.
- Effects of Answer Space Size on Responses to Open-ended questions in mail surveys; 2007; Israel, G. D.
- "Dirty Politics" Web Experiments on the Effects of Negative Communication Actions ; 2007; Tatzl, G.
- Quality of Online Research: Does it Improve Results? ; 2007; Lindemann, M.
- New Access to Information laws in Germany - a big bang for Computer-Assisted Reporting (CAR)? ; 2007; Redelfs, M.
- Online research praxis: the role of online research at Yahoo! ; 2007; Gonzales, R.
- Is Online Deception Really a Threat to Data Quality in Online Studies? Results from a Review; 2007; Stieger, S.