Web Survey Bibliography - Online measurement (791)

Page:

• 1
...
• 6
• 7
• 8
...
• 16

• Internet Survey Paradata; 2010; Heerwegh, D.
• Challenges in Reaching Hard-to-Reach Groups in Internet Panel Research; 2010; Marchand, M., Vis, C.
• How Visual Design Affects the Interpretability of Survey Questions; 2010; Toepoel, V., Dillman, D. A.
• Ethical Considerations in Internet Surveys; 2010; Singer, E., Couper, M. P.
• Internet Survey Methods: A Review of Strengths, Weaknesses, and Innovations; 2010; Smyth, J. D., Pearson, J. E.
• Measuring selection bias introduced by routing; 2010; Porter, S., de Gaudemar, O., Kimura, M.
• Quantifying the Impact of Survey Design Parameters on Respondent Engagement and Data Quality; 2010; Suresh, N., Conklin, M.
• Digital, Social Moms: Using Social Media to Increase Respondent Engagement and Decrease Recruiting Costs...; 2010; Stemberg, C., Rimmer, L., Weinstein, D.
• The Rise of Survey Programming Automation as an Alternative to Outsourcing; 2010; Ahmed, A. S., Guyer, L.
• Conditioning Effects in Online Communities; 2010; Cape, P. J.
• Predicting the Future with Social Media ; 2010; Asur, S., Huberman, B. A.
• News Platform Preference: Advancing the Effects of Age and Media Consumption on Political Participation...; 2010; Bachmann, I., Kaufhold, K., Lewis, S. C., de Zuniga, H. G.
• ReCal: Intercoder Reliability Calculation as a Web Service ; 2010; Freelon, D. G.
• Statistics Canada's Process Automation of On-line Survey Development and CATI Data Integration; 2010; Dubois, M.-A.
• Normalized Database Structure to Support Survey Fulfillment Operations; 2010; Sikes, N., Pittman, J., Hazel, K.
• How attrition/conditioning effects impact response bias in online panels ; 2010; Gittelmam, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
• Enrichment of Qualitative Research through Online Approaches: New Insights due to Online CoCreation...; 2010; Krischke-Ramaswamy, M., Knorr, H.
• A short self-report measure of problems with executive function suitable for administration via the...; 2010; Buchanan, T., Heffernan, T. M., Parrott, A. C., Ling, J., Rodgers, J., Scholey, A. B.
• Combining Link-Tracing Sampling and Cluster Sampling to Estimate Totals and Means of Hidden Human Populations...; 2010; Félix-Medina, M. H., Monjardin, P. E.
• System and method of providing an online survey and summarizing survey response data; 2010; Ryan, C. J.
• Security and Data Protection: Collection, Storage, Feedback in Internet Research; 2010; Thiele, O., Kaczmirek, L.
• An Experiment With an Employment Sector Question; 2010; Finno, A. A., Kohout, J.
• Lottery Incentives and Online Survey Response Rates; 2010; Preece, M. J., Johanson, G., Hitchcock, J.
• Breakoff in Web Surveys of the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES); 2010; Blumenstiel, J. E., Roßmann, J., Steinbrecher, M.
• Growing Pains; 2010; Trimarchi, E., Gittelmam, S. H.
• The Fallacy of Online Surveys: No Data Are Better Than Bad Data; 2010; Duda, M. D., Nobile, J. L.
• Improving the response rate and quality in Web-based surveys through the personalization and frequency...; 2010; Muñoz-Leiva, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., Montoro-Ríos, F. J., Ibáñez-Zapata, J. A.
• What are participants doing while filling in an online questionnaire: A paradata collection tool and...; 2010; Stieger, S., Reips, U. -D.
• Where Is the unproctored Internet testing train headed now?; 2009; Tippins, N. T.
• Recovering the scientist-practitioner model: How IOs should respond to unproctored internet testing; 2009; Beaty, J. C. et al.
• Preserving the integrity of online testing; 2009; Burke, E.
• Internet alternatives to traditional proctored testing: Where are we now?; 2009; Tippins, N. T.
• Getting data for (business) statistics: What's new? What's next?; 2009; Snijkers, G.
• Exploring mode effects in a panel survey of new businesses; 2009; Santos, B., DesRoches, D.
• Dirty little secrets of online panels. And how the one you select can make or break your study; 2009
• Association collaborative effort releases online research definitions, expands membership; 2009
• Continuous Measurement of Musically-Induced Emotion: A Web Experiment ; 2009; Egermann, H., Nagel, F., Altenmueller, E., Kopiez, R.
• E-epidemiology : Adapting epidemiological methods for the 21st century; 2009; Bexelius, C.
• Metadata-Driven Survey Design; 2009; Iverson, J.
• Design of Web Questionnaires: The Effect of Layout in Rating Scales; 2009; Toepoel, V., Das, M., van Soest, A.
• Metrics for panel contribution: a non probabilistic platform; 2009; Gittelmam, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
• Relation between values and topic of a survey in internet panel research; 2009; Vis, C., Marchand, M.
• Lottery Style Incentives and Response Rates to Online Surveys; 2009; Pearson, J., E., Krosnick, J. A.Levine, R. E.
• The Presentation of a Web Survey, Nonresponse and Measurement Error among Members of Web Panel; 2009; Tourangeau, R., Groves, R. M., Kennedy, C., Yan, T.
• Web Panel Studies of the 2008 Election; 2009; Dennis, J. M., Tompson, T.
• Comparison Study of Early Adopter Attitudes and Online Behavior in Probability and Non-Probability Web...; 2009; Dennis, J. M., Osborn, L., Semans, K.
• Presentation of a Single Item versus a Grid: Effects on the Vitality and Mental Health Scales of the...; 2009; Callegaro, M., Shand-Lubbers, J., Dennis, J. M.
• Ethical Considerations in the Use of Paradata in Web Surveys; 2009; Couper, M. P., Singer, E.
• The impact of forgiving wording and question context on social desirability bias in sensitive surveys...; 2009; Naher, A.- F., Krumpal, I.
• Interactive feedback can improve accuracy of responses in web surveys; 2009; Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., Galesic, M.

Page:

• 1
...
• 6
• 7
• 8
...
• 16