Web Survey Bibliography
Each of the traditional modes of data collection, whether face-to-face, telephone, or mail—has a rhythm and character that sets it apart from the others. The selection of mode has a significant effect on how samples are drawn, how individual questions get worded, and how items are ordered to form questionnaires. These differences often influence how people provide answers to individual questions, and even whether they respond at all to a particular survey. It would be surprising if the introduction of surveys by the Internet, did not also bring with it many new, often unintended, data collection practices that set it apart from other modes of surveying and which also influence data quality. Our purpose in this presentation is to identify a number of significant changes in data collection practices that are consequences of surveys on the Internet that are based upon periodic surveys of random samples of students atWashington State University conducted by the authors. These surveys are designed to provide useful longitudinal information to University leadership for tracking how students are responding to the education being provided by our University. In this paper we discuss a wide variety of coverage, measurement and non-response issues that require us to approach the web surveying process differently than when we relied only on telephone and/or mail systems. The changes include coverage issues, e.g. not being able to get a single list of postal, telephone, or web addresses, because of changes in what address information students are required to provide to the university and the change from mandatory updating to making it voluntary as to which address is available for university use. Another change we discuss is the benefit of using contacts by an alternative mode (mail) to deliver meaningful incentives in order to achieve high web survey response rates. Based upon extensive experimentation which shows that differences in the visual layout of questionnaires influence how people respond to web survey questions we discuss the use of procedures such as Cascading style sheet construction and other measures in order to control the visual aspect of questions seen by respondents in an effort to provide the same stimulus to each respondent. Another critical change has to do with the development of monitoring systems to quickly analyze and respond to respondent problems and concerns that are critical in a web context for converting likely refusals to completes. These are examples of the topics to be discussed. The learnings from these periodic surveys have provided a basis for developing a web survey system now used by the Social and Economic Sciences Research Center that we now employ in a general way for doing web surveys of many other populations. In the proposed paper we will describe in detail both the problems and solutions associated with maintaining high quality survey data collection processes, making specific reference to how the web has required us to change long-standing data collection practices that previously supported our telephone and mail data collection systems.
Web Survey Bibliography - 2005 (418)
- The effects of survey frequency on panelists' responses; 2005; Coen, T., Lorch, J.,
- Questionnaire Length & Fatigue Effects; 2005; La Bruna, A., Rathod, S.
- Non-equivalence of online and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: The case of the Prospective Memory...; 2005; Buchanan, T., Ali, T., Heffernan, T. M., Ling, J., Parrott, A. C., Rodgers, J., Scholey, A. B.
- Using the Internet to Survey College Students About Their Law School Plans; 2005; Meinhold, S. S., Gleiber, D. W.
- Similarity and Helping Behavior on the Web: The Impact of the Convergence of Surnames Between a Solicitor...; 2005; Guéguen, N., Pichot, N., Le Dreff, G.
- Effects of Survey Mode on Self-Reports of Adult Alcohol Consumption: A Comparison of Mail, Web and Telephone...; 2005; Link, M. W., Mokdad, A.
- Toward An Open-Source Methodology: What We Can Learn From The Blogosphere; 2005; M.
- Online surveys for BGLT research: Issues and techniques; 2005; Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., Reedy, C. S.
- Internet data collection; 2005; Hayslett, M. M.
- Web-Based Surveys; 2005; Ellis, B., Zurita, F., Ventura, J.
- Digital Video as Research Practice: Methodology for the Millennium; 2005; Shrum, W., Duque, R., Brown, T.
- Sex Differences in the Acceptability of Discrimination; 2005; Kuran, T., McCaffrey, E. J.
- Effects of survey mode, gender, and perceived sensitivity on the quality of data regarding sensitive...; 2005; Mi Kyung, J.
- Heterosexism in high school among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning students; 2005; Noah, C.-T. D.
- Taking pro-action: A survey of potential users before the availability of wireless access and the implementation...; 2005; Holden, H. A., Deng, M.
- Comparing data from online and face-to-face surveys; 2005; Duffy, C., Smith, K., Terhanian, G., Bremer, J.
- 'Hidden' opportunities and benefits in using web-based business-to-business surveys; 2005; Grant, D. B., Teller, C., Teller, W.
- Dinámica del proceso de recolección y análisis de datos vía web; 2005; Freitas, H., Janissek-Muniz, R., Moscarola, J.
- The Contribution Of Respondent Computer Experience On Primacy Effect And Satisficing in Internet Surveys...; 2005; Cross, F.
- Lessons Learned From Online vs. Paper-based Computer Information Students’ Evaluation System; 2005; Liegle, J., McDonald, D. S.
- Factors to Weigh When Considering Electronic Data Collection; 2005; Courtney, K. L., Craven, C. K.
- Introduction To Survey Research Design; 2005; Owens, L. K.
- Aux Abonnes Absents: Liste Rouge Et Telephone Portable Dans Les Enquetes En Population Generale Sur...; 2005; Beck, F., Legleye, S., Peretti-Watel, P.
- Comparing Responses and Response Rates of Web and Telephone Surveys; 2005; Bedy, Z.
- Using Online Surveys to Evaluate Distance Education Programs; 2005; Strachota, E., Schmidt, S., Conceicao, S.
- Web surveys : Explaining and Reducing Unit Nonresponse, Item Nonresponse and Partial Nonresponse; 2005; Heerwegh, D.
- Methodological issues in the recruitment of ethnic minority subjects to research via the Internet: a...; 2005; Im, E. O., Chee, W.
- How design elements influence web surveys; 2005; Anonymous
- Electronic Surveys – Pros and Cons; 2005; Anonymous
- Web Versus Paper Questionnares: A Design and Functionality - Comparison; 2005; Jones, J., Fraser, C., Dowling, Z.
- Building An Online Panel; 2005; Rathod, S.
- Thoughts on Internet Research in Europe; 2005; Harris Interactive
- Effects of Personal Salutations in E-mail Invitations to Participate in a Web Survey; 2005; Heerwegh, D.
- Web Surveys and the new Disability Discrimination Act; 2005; Macer, T.
- Measuring Perceived and Actual Response Burden in Business Surveys; 2005; Dale, T., Haraldsen, G., Jones, J., Hedlin, D.
- Web survey design for predicting performance using network questions; 2005; Coromina, L.
- How Internet Surveys Are Changing Data Collection Practices: The Case of University Student Surveys...; 2005; Dillman, D. A., Allen, T.
- Online student feedback surveys. Methodological issues in comparison to the traditional classroom survey...; 2005; Fuchs, M.
- Monitoring quality of life in small and medium sized cities –results of online-survey research; 2005; Aehnelt, R., Kuehn, M., Schuette, I.
- Sampling Problems inWeb Surveys; 2005; Steffensen, J. B.
- Web surveys: inference using weighting and imputation in the survey on graduates; 2005; Biffignandi, S., Fabrizi, E., Pratesi, M., Salvati, N.
- Expert Appraisals of BusinessWeb Survey Applications; 2005; Haraldsen, G.
- Nonresponse segments in Internet and mobile phone surveys; 2005; Vehovar, V., Belak, E., Lavtar, D.
- Ten Tangible and Practical Tips to Improve Student Participation in Web Surveys; 2005; Molasso, W. R.
- Use Online Surveys to Get the Feedback You Need; 2005; Toledano, Y.
- The Trouble With Web Surveys; 2005; Cooper, B.
- Behavioral research and data collection via the Internet; 2005; Birnbaum, M. H., Reips, U. -D.
- The Use of Multiple Imputation to Create a Null Data Set from Nonrandomized Job Training Data; 2005; Rubin, D. B.
- Complications When Using Nonrandomized Job Training Data to Draw Causal Inferences; 2005; Raessler, S.
- Inference from non-probability samples in marketing research; 2005; Blyth, B.

