Web Survey Bibliography
Students are asked on a regular basis to evaluate the lectures and seminars that they are attending. Until recently this has been done by paper and pencil surveys in a classroom setting. In recent years some systems became available to approach student using web surveys. Since this methodology has various advantages (in terms of cost and time, data protection), some methodological concerns have been raised:
(1) Over-coverage and under-coverage: In order to be included into the study, all students have to be registered with a valid e-mail address. Since almost every student has an e-mail address nowadays this no longer seems to be an issue. However, there is a small population who abandons the Internet or are not willing to provide their e-mail address. These populations cannot be reached using web surveys. By contrast, using web survey methodology we can address also students who abandoned the class or course in the course of the semester. As a result, the two survey modes address overlapping, however, slightly different populations which has consequences for the results.
(2) Non-response: Experiences from several waves of online student feedback web surveys suggests that nonresponse is of great concern. Compared to a class room setting where social pressure leads to almost 100 percent cooperation, students feel less obliged to participate in web surveys. Several strategies in reducing non-response for the web survey condition were tested.
(3) Measurement: Completing a paper form in class in the presence of the teacher implies a completely different social setting compared to responding to a web survey at home, in the dorm or at some other place. Thus, concerns were raised, that measurement bias related to the mode of administration should be of great importance. However, experimental research (split half design) suggests, that only minor differences of the data occur. The paper summarizes this line of methodological research for student feedback and course evaluation web surveys based on a series of four studies conducted over the past several years.
Web Survey Bibliography - 2005 (417)
- Questionnaire Length & Fatigue Effects; 2005; La Bruna, A., Rathod, S.
- Non-equivalence of online and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: The case of the Prospective Memory...; 2005; Buchanan, T., Ali, T., Heffernan, T. M., Ling, J., Parrott, A. C., Rodgers, J., Scholey, A. B.
- Using the Internet to Survey College Students About Their Law School Plans; 2005; Meinhold, S. S., Gleiber, D. W.
- Similarity and Helping Behavior on the Web: The Impact of the Convergence of Surnames Between a Solicitor...; 2005; Guéguen, N., Pichot, N., Le Dreff, G.
- Effects of Survey Mode on Self-Reports of Adult Alcohol Consumption: A Comparison of Mail, Web and Telephone...; 2005; Link, M. W., Mokdad, A.
- Toward An Open-Source Methodology: What We Can Learn From The Blogosphere; 2005; M.
- Online surveys for BGLT research: Issues and techniques; 2005; Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., Reedy, C. S.
- Internet data collection; 2005; Hayslett, M. M.
- Web-Based Surveys; 2005; Ellis, B., Zurita, F., Ventura, J.
- Digital Video as Research Practice: Methodology for the Millennium; 2005; Shrum, W., Duque, R., Brown, T.
- Sex Differences in the Acceptability of Discrimination; 2005; Kuran, T., McCaffrey, E. J.
- Effects of survey mode, gender, and perceived sensitivity on the quality of data regarding sensitive...; 2005; Mi Kyung, J.
- Heterosexism in high school among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning students; 2005; Noah, C.-T. D.
- Taking pro-action: A survey of potential users before the availability of wireless access and the implementation...; 2005; Holden, H. A., Deng, M.
- Comparing data from online and face-to-face surveys; 2005; Duffy, C., Smith, K., Terhanian, G., Bremer, J.
- 'Hidden' opportunities and benefits in using web-based business-to-business surveys; 2005; Grant, D. B., Teller, C., Teller, W.
- Dinámica del proceso de recolección y análisis de datos vía web; 2005; Freitas, H., Janissek-Muniz, R., Moscarola, J.
- The Contribution Of Respondent Computer Experience On Primacy Effect And Satisficing in Internet Surveys...; 2005; Cross, F.
- Lessons Learned From Online vs. Paper-based Computer Information Students’ Evaluation System; 2005; Liegle, J., McDonald, D. S.
- Factors to Weigh When Considering Electronic Data Collection; 2005; Courtney, K. L., Craven, C. K.
- Introduction To Survey Research Design; 2005; Owens, L. K.
- Aux Abonnes Absents: Liste Rouge Et Telephone Portable Dans Les Enquetes En Population Generale Sur...; 2005; Beck, F., Legleye, S., Peretti-Watel, P.
- Comparing Responses and Response Rates of Web and Telephone Surveys; 2005; Bedy, Z.
- Using Online Surveys to Evaluate Distance Education Programs; 2005; Strachota, E., Schmidt, S., Conceicao, S.
- Web surveys : Explaining and Reducing Unit Nonresponse, Item Nonresponse and Partial Nonresponse; 2005; Heerwegh, D.
- Methodological issues in the recruitment of ethnic minority subjects to research via the Internet: a...; 2005; Im, E. O., Chee, W.
- How design elements influence web surveys; 2005; Anonymous
- Electronic Surveys – Pros and Cons; 2005; Anonymous
- Web Versus Paper Questionnares: A Design and Functionality - Comparison; 2005; Jones, J., Fraser, C., Dowling, Z.
- Building An Online Panel; 2005; Rathod, S.
- Thoughts on Internet Research in Europe; 2005; Harris Interactive
- Effects of Personal Salutations in E-mail Invitations to Participate in a Web Survey; 2005; Heerwegh, D.
- Web Surveys and the new Disability Discrimination Act; 2005; Macer, T.
- Measuring Perceived and Actual Response Burden in Business Surveys; 2005; Dale, T., Haraldsen, G., Jones, J., Hedlin, D.
- Web survey design for predicting performance using network questions; 2005; Coromina, L.
- How Internet Surveys Are Changing Data Collection Practices: The Case of University Student Surveys...; 2005; Dillman, D. A., Allen, T.
- Online student feedback surveys. Methodological issues in comparison to the traditional classroom survey...; 2005; Fuchs, M.
- Monitoring quality of life in small and medium sized cities –results of online-survey research; 2005; Aehnelt, R., Kuehn, M., Schuette, I.
- Sampling Problems inWeb Surveys; 2005; Steffensen, J. B.
- Web surveys: inference using weighting and imputation in the survey on graduates; 2005; Biffignandi, S., Fabrizi, E., Pratesi, M., Salvati, N.
- Expert Appraisals of BusinessWeb Survey Applications; 2005; Haraldsen, G.
- Nonresponse segments in Internet and mobile phone surveys; 2005; Vehovar, V., Belak, E., Lavtar, D.
- Ten Tangible and Practical Tips to Improve Student Participation in Web Surveys; 2005; Molasso, W. R.
- Use Online Surveys to Get the Feedback You Need; 2005; Toledano, Y.
- The Trouble With Web Surveys; 2005; Cooper, B.
- Behavioral research and data collection via the Internet; 2005; Birnbaum, M. H., Reips, U. -D.
- The Use of Multiple Imputation to Create a Null Data Set from Nonrandomized Job Training Data; 2005; Rubin, D. B.
- Complications When Using Nonrandomized Job Training Data to Draw Causal Inferences; 2005; Raessler, S.
- Inference from non-probability samples in marketing research; 2005; Blyth, B.
- Creative Applications of Selection Bias Modelling in Market Research; 2005; Terhanian, G., Bremer, J.

