Web Survey Bibliography - Weighting & imputation (267)

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6

• A Nonparametric Approach to Weighting Web Panel Data; 2007; Thorburn, D., Lorenc, B.
• Calibration and propensity score weighting in web surveys; 2007; Fabrizi, E., Biffignandi, S.
• THE READERSHIP CURRENCY: DUTCH DESIGN How a new methodology for AIR measurement opens up new perspectives...; 2007; Petric, I., Appel, M.
• Intention to Participate in Web Surveys: An Extended TPB Model; 2007; Fang, J., Shao, P., Wan, J.
• The Usage of Magnitude Estimation Scales in Online Surveys - Results of a Joint Project; 2007; Althoff, S., Dumke, U.
• Calibration and Propensity Score Weighting in Web Surveys; 2007; Fabrizi, E., Biffignandi, S.
• Quality issues in online research; 2007; Sparrow, N.
• Comparison of Data Collection Procedures; 2007; Saris, W. E.
• The Effect of Changing Sample Composition on Time-Variation in Reported Business Conditions; 2007; van der Klaauw, W., Bram, J., Deitz, R., Orr, J., Topa, G.
• Perspektive Deutschland -- a Case Study of a Very Large Internet Survey; 2007; Boersch-Supan, A., Esner, D., Fassbender, H., Kiefer, R., McFadden, D., Winter, J.
• Are ‘Webographic' or Attitudinal Questions Useful for Adjusting Estimates from Web Surveys Using...; 2007; Schonlau, M., van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A.
• Development and Analysis of Joint Internet-Telephone Hunter Surveys; 2007; Lukacs, P. E.Lukacs, P. M.; de Rouvray, C.
• Peeping Over Computers The Slovenian Internet Audience Measurement Mix Model ; 2007; Cucin, P., Kropivnik, S., Hocevar, J.
• What's Missing from National RDD Surveys? The Impact of Growing Cell-Only Population.; 2007; Keeter, S., Kennedy, C., Tompson, T., Mokrzycki, M., Clark, A.
• Combining Cell Phone and Landline Samples: Dual Frame Approach.; 2007; ZuWallack, R. S.
• Statistics for real-life sample surveys: non-simple-random samples and weighted data; 2006; Dorofeev, S., Grant, P.
• Sample matching. Representative sampling from Internet panels; 2006; Rivers, D.
• A framework for survey breakoffs; 2006; Peytchev, A.
• Assessing Panel Bias in the Knowledge Networks Panel: Updated Results from 2005 Research ; 2006; Pineau, V., Nukulkij, P., Tang, X.
• Weighting an Internet Panel Survey on Drug Use and Abuse; 2006; Gordek, H., Williams, R. L., Dai, L.
• Supplementing RDD Surveys with Web-Based Survey Data; 2006; Krotki, K.
• Web Survey Methodology (WebSM) Portal; 2006; Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.
• Propensity Score Adjustment as a Weighting Scheme for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys; 2006; Lee, Sunghee
• Selection Bias in Web Surveys and the Use of Propensity Scores; 2006; Schonlau, M., van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A., Couper, M. P.
• Comparing Internet Users and Nonusers’ Behavior toward Market Products; 2006; Diaz-Tena, N., Benford, R.
• Correcting for bias in a self-selected sample using a random sample as auxiliary information: the Dutch...; 2006; Oberski, D.
• The shift to on-line research. Managing and taking advantage of it.; 2006; Alexander, J., Fine, J., Davies, S.
• Make the Connection: Recruit for online surveys offline as well; 2006; Enright, A.
• Evaluating the Transition of an Ongoing RDD Survey to a Dual Mode-Dual Frame RDD/Internet Survey; 2006; Dutwin, D., Herrmann, M., Kulp, D., Lavine, S.
• Estimation in surveys with nonresponse; 2005; Sarndal, C.-E., Lundstrom, S.
• Does weighting for nonresponse increase the variance of survey means?; 2005; Little, R. J., Vartivarian, S.
• Comparing data from online and face-to-face surveys; 2005; Duffy, C., Smith, K., Terhanian, G., Bremer, J.
• Factors to Weigh When Considering Electronic Data Collection; 2005; Courtney, K. L., Craven, C. K.
• Thoughts on Internet Research in Europe; 2005; Harris Interactive
• Web surveys: inference using weighting and imputation in the survey on graduates; 2005; Biffignandi, S., Fabrizi, E., Pratesi, M., Salvati, N.
• The Use of Multiple Imputation to Create a Null Data Set from Nonrandomized Job Training Data; 2005; Rubin, D. B.
• Creative Applications of Selection Bias Modelling in Market Research; 2005; Terhanian, G., Bremer, J.
• Online-Access-Panels Based on Probability Samples: Can they Yield Representative Results?; 2005; Bandilla, W.
• Simple Approaches to Estimating the Variance of the Propensity Score Weighted Estimator Applied on Volunteer...; 2005; Isaksson, A., Lee, Sunghee; de Rouvray, C.
• Adjustment of Web Panel Survey Estimates by Regression Imputation; 2005; Varedian, M.
• Web surveys: inference using weighting and imputation in the survey on graduates; 2005; Biffignandi, S., Fabrizi, E., Pratesi, M., Salvati, N.
• Stated Preference Surveys on Internet – an Effective Method for Finding Passengers’ Preferences...; 2005; Nossum, A.
• Combining Information from Multiple Modes to Evaluate and Reduce Nonresponse Bias; 2005; Couper, M. P., Peytchev, A., Little, R. J., Strecher, V., Rothert, K.
• Simple Approaches to Estimating the Variance of the Propensity Score Weighted Estimator Applied on Volunteer...; 2005; Isaksson, A., Lee, Sunghee
• Variance Estimation for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys Using Propensity Score Adjustment and Calibration...; 2005; Lee, Sunghee, Valliant, R. L.
• Conducting representative online research. A summary of five years of learnings; 2005; Stenbjerre, M., Laugesen, J. N.
• Mode Effects for Hybrid Telephone/Internet Surveys and Reaching Cellphone-Only Households; 2005; Kulp, D., Herrmann, M., Dutwin, D., Lavine, S.
• Adjusting for selection bias in Web surveys using propensity scores: the case of the Health and Retirement...; 2005; Schonlau, M., van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A., Couper, M. P.
• How to make internet surveys representative: A case study of a two-step weighting procedure; 2004; Borsch-Supan, A. et al.
• Benchmarking Knowledge Networks’ Web-enabled panel survey of selected GSS questions against GSS...; 2004; Dennis, J. M., Li, R. J., Chatt, C.

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6