Web Survey Bibliography
Title Visual Analogue Scales: Non-linear Data Categorization by Transformation with Reduced Extremes
Author Funke, F., Reips, U. -D.
Year 2006
Access date 20.09.2006
Abstract Two different ways of analyzing data from visual analogue scales (VAS) have been compared to one another: linear transformation that is commonly used, and transformation with reduced extremes. The VAS that have been examined here consist of horizontal lines with verbal anchors at both ends. VAS values can be determined accurate to a pixel and fall into the category of continuous response formats. By generating data on interval scale level, they meet important requirements for the applicability of parametric procedures. In two online experiments the influence of VAS on the respondent's way of answering questions has been examined in comparison to (4-, 5-, and 8-point) categorical scales.
As expected, the two response formats had no influence on central statistical parameters. Although, on the face of it, they appeared to be equivalent, it could be shown that the commonly used linear transformation of VAS' values results in systematic differences. This means that the use of different response formats can lead to different interpretations. An alternative way of categorizing data obtained from VAS is therefore suggested, and in the first experiment it could be demonstrated that by using this alternative data from both response formats turned out to be actually equivalent.
To be able to compare the frequencies of categorical scales with VAS, segments of the VAS have to be put together to form categories. Two ways of categorizing data have been examined. The first one consists in linear transformation, where equal intervals of the VAS are put together to form one category. This leads to equally spaced categories with same size and distance and represents the transfer of the VAS' characteristics onto categorical scales. The second way is the use of transformation with reduced extremes. The segments on the VAS that are put together to form the extreme categories are smaller here than the segments that form the other categories. Transformation with reduced extremes leads to greater correspondence with the frequencies on categorical scales and, all in all, is clearly superior to linear transformation. Since on VAS the extreme categories are represented by smaller intervals than the other categories, they appear to be less important to the respondent. This means that the centers of categories and categorical scales have different distances so that they are not perceived as equidistant.
In a second experiment - to take into account the reduced distances of the extreme categories - the categorical scales were optically modified according to the transformation procedure with reduced extremes. The space between the radio buttons (i.e. categories) is no longer the same but represents the reduced extremes. The distance between the outermost button and the adjoining one is smaller than the distance between the other buttons. The aim is to create a scale whose categories are perceived as having the same distances so that the required equidistance is no longer violated.
As expected, the two response formats had no influence on central statistical parameters. Although, on the face of it, they appeared to be equivalent, it could be shown that the commonly used linear transformation of VAS' values results in systematic differences. This means that the use of different response formats can lead to different interpretations. An alternative way of categorizing data obtained from VAS is therefore suggested, and in the first experiment it could be demonstrated that by using this alternative data from both response formats turned out to be actually equivalent.
To be able to compare the frequencies of categorical scales with VAS, segments of the VAS have to be put together to form categories. Two ways of categorizing data have been examined. The first one consists in linear transformation, where equal intervals of the VAS are put together to form one category. This leads to equally spaced categories with same size and distance and represents the transfer of the VAS' characteristics onto categorical scales. The second way is the use of transformation with reduced extremes. The segments on the VAS that are put together to form the extreme categories are smaller here than the segments that form the other categories. Transformation with reduced extremes leads to greater correspondence with the frequencies on categorical scales and, all in all, is clearly superior to linear transformation. Since on VAS the extreme categories are represented by smaller intervals than the other categories, they appear to be less important to the respondent. This means that the centers of categories and categorical scales have different distances so that they are not perceived as equidistant.
In a second experiment - to take into account the reduced distances of the extreme categories - the categorical scales were optically modified according to the transformation procedure with reduced extremes. The space between the radio buttons (i.e. categories) is no longer the same but represents the reduced extremes. The distance between the outermost button and the adjoining one is smaller than the distance between the other buttons. The aim is to create a scale whose categories are perceived as having the same distances so that the required equidistance is no longer violated.
Access/Direct link Conference homepage (abstract)
Year of publication2006
Bibliographic typeConferences, workshops, tutorials, presentations
Full text availabilityNon-existant
Web Survey Bibliography (6476)
- Using GIS to Target Address-Based Samples of Households for a Web (vs. Mail) Response: Evidence from...; 2013; Messer, B. L.
- Is Pushing the General Public to the Web in Address-Based Samples Cost Effective?; 2013; Lesser, V. M.
- Effects of Survey Sponsorship on Internet and Mail Response: Using Address- Based Sampling; 2013; Edwards, M. L.
- Grid Formats, Data Quality, and Mobile Device Use: A Questionnaire Design Approach; 2013; McClain, C., Crawford, S. D.
- Can Embedded Help Text Links in Web Survey Items Improve Data Quality?; 2013; Janson, N., Bennett, C., Caves, L., Cominole, M., Shepherd, B., Wine, J.
- Using the iPad as a Prize-Based Incentive to Boost Response Rates: A Case Study at Brigham Young University...; 2013; McClendon, R., Olsen, D.
- Can Google Consumer Surveys Help Pre-Test Alternative Versions of a Survey Question?: A Comparison of...; 2013; Stern, M. J., Welch, W. W.
- Online Panels: Recruitment Based on “Hot Topics” – What are the Consequences?; 2013; Andreasson, M., Martinsson, J.
- Social Network Analysis and Survey Response: How Facebook Data Can Supplement Survey Data; 2013; Sage, A.
- Surveywalls: A Breakthrough for Survey Customers or DIY Run Amok?; 2013; Wells, T., Dean, E., Rao, K., Murphy, J., Roe, D. J.
- Examining the Effects of Interventions to Obtain Participation via Less Expensive Modes: Results from...; 2013; Harris-Kojetin, L., Sengupta, M., Hobbs, M., Greene, A.
- Evaluating the Effect of a Non-Monetary Incentive in a Nationally Representative Mixed-Mode Establishment...; 2013; Sengupta, M., Harris-Kojetin, L., Hobbs, M., Greene, A.
- Dynamic Visual Design for List-Style Open-Ended Questions in Web Surveys; 2013; Fuchs, M.
- Classifying Mouse Movements to Predict Respondent Difficulty; 2013; Horwitz, R.
- Are You Seeing What I am Seeing? Exploring Response Option Visual Design Effects With Eye-Tracking; 2013; Libman, A., Smyth, J. D., Olson, K.
- Evaluating Interactive Feedback in Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing (CASI); 2013; Hudson, M. L., Hupp, A., Zhang, C., Schroeder, H. M.
- Effective e-incentive for Online Study: Comparing Branded e-Gift Card and Virtual Cash Card; 2013; Jin, T., Duan, S., Lai, J. W., Link, M. W.
- First Contact Strategies for Web Surveys: Is a Phone Call or a Letter the More Effective Introduction...; 2013; Connelly, J., Sjoblom, M., Datta, R., Scholfield Hepburn, P.
- Response Format Effects in the Measurement of Employment; 2013; Rodkin, S., Thomas, R. K., Subias, S., Chu, C.
- Impact of Filter Questions on Estimates of Media Consumption; 2013; Cobb, C. L., Godinez, D., Thomas, R. K., Baim, J.
- The Effect of Survey Mode on Nonresponse Bias and Measurement Error: A Validation Approach; 2013; Kirchner, A., Felderer, B.
- Cross-Platform Measurement: User Experience With a Smartphone and Web Self- Reported Data Collection...; 2013; Petras, A. P., Duan, S., Dan, O.
- How Far Have We Come? The Lingering Digital Divide and Its Impact on the Representativeness of Internet...; 2013; Dennis, J. M., Cobb, C. L.
- How Do Different Sampling Techniques Perform in a Web-Only Survey? Results From a Comparison of a Random...; 2013; Bilgen, I., Stern, M. J., Wolter, K.
- Paradata in Web Surveys; 2013; Callegaro, M.
- Are Response Rates to a Web-Only Survey Spatially Clustered?; 2013; Fiorio, L., Stern, M. J., English, N., Bilgen, I., Curtis, B.
- The Effectiveness of Mailed Invitations for Web Surveys; 2013; Bandilla, W., Couper, M. P., Kaczmirek, L.
- Examining the Feasibility of SMS as a Contact Mode for a College Student Survey; 2013; Crawford, S. D., McClain, C., O'Brien, S., Nelson, T. F.
- The Impact on Web Survey Drop-Out Rates of Page Number Progress Indicators Used Throughout, Near the...; 2013; Walston, J. T., Cunningham, B., Medway, R.
- Survey Reminder Method Experiment: An Examination of Cost Efficiency and Reminder Mode Salience in the...; 2013; Anderson, M., Rogers, B., CyBulski, K., Hall, J. W., Alderks, C. E., Milazzo-Sayre, L.
- Using Qualitative and Quantitative Testing to Improve Hispanic Response Rates for Online Surveys; 2013; Pens, Y., Gentry, R. J.
- The Use of Email, Text Messages, and Facebook to Increase Response Rates Among Adolescents in a Longitudinal...; 2013; Fleeman, A., Francis, K., Henderson, T., Woodford, M., Jani, M.
- Use of Smart Phones/Text Messaging to Increase Response Rates; 2013; DuBray, P.
- Designing Surveys for Tablets and Smartphones; 2013; Lakhe, S., Nichols, E. M., Olmsted, M. G., King, T.
- Tablets as Data Entry Interfaces – Solving Data Cleaning and Transcription Issues During Data...; 2013; Costall, A.
- Effects of Response Format on Measurement of Readership; 2013; Thomas, R. K., Cobb, C. L., Baim, J.
- Potential Impact of Modifying the Fielding Time of a Web-Based Survey; 2013; Baum, H. M., Chandonnet, A.
- How Representative are Google Consumer Surveys?: Results From an Analysis of a Google Consumer Survey...; 2013; Krishnamurty, P., Tanenbaum, E., Stern, M. J.
- One Drink or Two: Does Quantity Depicted in an Image Affect Web Survey Responses?; 2013; Charoenruk, N., Stange, M.
- A Comparison Between Screen/Follow Item Format and Yes/No Item Format on a Multi-Mode Federal Survey; 2013; Hernandez,S. J., Arakelyan, S. N., Welch, V. E.
- Using Multiple Modes in Follow-Up Contacts in Random-Digit Dialing Surveys; 2013; Chowdhury, P. P.
- Tablets and Smartphones and Netbooks, Oh My! Effects of Device Type on Respondent Behavior; 2013; Ross, H., Mendelson, J., Lackey, M.
- Impacts of Unit Nonresponse in a Recontact Study of Youth; 2013; Mendelson, J., Viera Jr., L.
- Multi-Mode Survey Administration: Does Offering Multiple Modes at Once Depress Response Rates?; 2013; Newsome, J., Levin, K., Langetieg, P., Vigil, M., Sebastiani, M.
- Responsive Design for Web Panel Data Collection; 2013; Bianchi, A., Biffignandi, S.
- Utilizing the Web in a Multi-Mode Survey; 2013; Venkataraman, L.
- Changing to a Mixed-Mode Design: The Role of Mode in Respondents’ Decisions About Participation...; 2013; Collins, D., Mitchell, M., Toomes, M.
- Comparing the Effects of Mode Design on Response Rate, Representativeness, and Cost Per Complete in...; 2013; Tully, R.
- Internet Response for the Decennial Census – 2012 National Census Test; 2013; Reiser, C.
- The Effects of Pushing Web in a Mixed-Mode Establishment Data Collection; 2013; Ellis, C.

