Web Survey Bibliography
Title The impact of visualization of question types and screen pages on the answering behaviour in online surveys
Access date 20.09.2006
Abstract The impact of visualization of question types and screen pages on the answering behaviour in online surveys In online surveys there is no clear relation between question and question type. Answer options can be realized in several ways: as single response list (vertical), as single response list (horizontal), drop down or drop-up menu with a determined number of answer options or without given answer options. In the case of answer scales the questioner can decide whether he wants to present all scale characteristics in full or if he wants to show only the end points; whether he wants to use numbers from e.g. –2 to +2 or numbers from 1-5; whether he arranges the scale from left to right in ascending or descending order. He can also decide whether he wants to use illustrative scale characteristics such as smilies. Often images are used as eye-catcher: A question about car usage presented with a picture of a traffic jam or presented with a picture of a free highway may lead to different results. The authors of this study believe that the choice of the question types and the design of the screen pages have a measurable effect on the answer behaviour. For this purpose identical questions about behaviour with identical characteristics in different form were presented to participants who were drawn by random from an online panel in different stages. Weekly, within a period of 3 months, 1,000 people were invited to take part in a survey and different survey designs were shown to them at random. Thus data from more than 20,0000 participants, which vary in terms of Internet experience, interview experience, gender, age and time of membership, is available. The result of the study confirmed the thesis of the authors: the visualisation of question types and screen pages influences the answer behaviour in online surveys. On the basis of the results the authors set up a list of recommendations for the visualisation of question types and screen pages.
Access/Direct link Conference homepage (abstract)
Bibliographic typeConferences, workshops, tutorials, presentations
Year of publication2006
Full text availabilityNon-existant
Web Survey Bibliography - General Online Research Conference (GOR) 2006 (29)
- Cash Lotteries as Incentives in Online Panels; 2006; Goeritz, A.
- ‘Low social presence’ in web surveys: advantage or disadvantage or both? An experiment; 2006; Taddicken, M.
- How much individualisation does a conjoint survey need? - Experiences from an online experiment; 2006; Tuschl, S., Morasch, N.
- The effect of different kinds of progress bars on online survey compliance and data quality; 2006; van der Horst, W., Snijders, C., Matzat, U.
- The impact of persuasion strategies on the response rate in online surveys: Incentives, foot-in-the-...; 2006; Verheyen, C.; Schuebel, C., Moser, K.
- Online visual landscape assessment using Internet survey techniques in landscape planning and environmental...; 2006; Roth, M.
- Image Impact Evaluation - A new methodological approach with virtual test environments; 2006; Selke, S., Fetzner, D.
- Air refresheners online? Validity check of an Internet online sample using external reference data; 2006; Starsetzki, T., Lehmann, G.
- Online Evaluation Survey; 2006; Strzoda, C.
- Online Survey Response Patterns; 2006; Sutton A., Hopkins Burke, K.
- Does the Collection of Ego-Centered Network Data on the Web reduce the Data Quality? An Experimental...; 2006; Matzat, U., Snijders, C.
- Optimizing open-ended questions in online questionnaires for measuring price perception and willingness...; 2006; Melles, T., Ellers, G.
- Ranking vs. Rating in an online Environment; 2006; Neubarth, W.
- Online Recruiting on Internet pages New Solution for On Exit Recruitment on WebSites; 2006; Otto, P.
- Online Conjoint Analysis: The faster, the worse?; 2006; Puetzfeld, S., Melles, T.
- Web survey on transition from university to work: measuring the marginal effect mode; 2006; D'Agostino, A., Quintano, C., Castellano, R.
- Qualitative research online: Self-reported pros and cons of being chat-interviewed online with web cameras...; 2006; Davidovich, U., Uhr, H.
- Visual Analogue Scales: Non-linear Data Categorization by Transformation with Reduced Extremes; 2006; Funke, F., Reips, U. -D.
- Response Biases in Online Surveys; 2006; Galesic, M., Bosnjak, M.
- Using Instant Messaging for Internet-based interviews; 2006; Goeritz, A., Stieger, S.
- A online-offline method comparison based on quasi-experimental data from two surveys to family stress...; 2006; Haenggi, Y., Heldner, C.
- Hybrid Methods in Market Research - Learnings and Limits; 2006; Helmold, D., Kohlmann, U.
- The impact of visualization of question types and screen pages on the answering behaviour in online...; 2006; Hemsing, W., Hellwig, O.
- Specific Demands of Longitudinal Online-Surveys; 2006; Kahnwald, N., Koehler, T.
- A Comparison of the validity of a paper based and an online Conjoint Analysis; 2006; Klein, A., Scheffold, K.
- Determinants of Response Rates of Online Surveys - The Anita Effect - Results of a Joint Project; 2006; Althoff, S., Greif, V., Griel, B., Batinic, B.
- Technical opportunities for automation and integration of online surveys in business processes; 2006; Batinic, B.
- Personality traits and participation in an online access panel; 2006; Galesic, M., Bosnjak, M.