Web Survey Bibliography
Title Software Tools for Web Surveys: The More You Pay, the More You Get
Author Berzelak, J., Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.
Source Applied Statistics 2006
Year 2006
Access date 25.09.2006
Abstract Web surveys are increasingly becoming an important part of the survey industry worldwide. Their use presents a promising solution in many cases, especially when surveying populations with high Internet penetration. This is due to relatively low costs, speed of data collection and ease of implementation of the survey project. Especially the latter is enabled by using special software applications for preparation and implementation of web surveys. They offer a variety of features for designing online questionnaires, recruitment of the respondents, sample management, data collection and storage. Usage of these tools requires no programming skills or in-depth computer knowledge, mainly thanks to graphical user interfaces available in the vast majority of them. There are currently more than 300 web survey software products available on the market. However, availability of different features varies significantly among them. Some of these products allow implementation of simple daily polls with only one or a few questions. On the other hand, there are applications that enable creation of long and complex survey projects, consisting of a large number of questions, branching logic, multimedia elements and other advanced features. Usage of these features also raises several methodological considerations which should be taken into account during the preparation of a survey project. All this, along with significant differences in costs and pricing schemes, makes it difficult to decide on the right software application for specific needs of an individual researcher or a research organization.
Our paper discusses the most important features of software tools for web surveys and provides an overview of the tools on the market. A random sample of software tools from the WebSM database (http://www.websm.org) was evaluated and the differences between free of charge and commercial tools are presented. It is shown that more expensive tools allow higher flexibility and better functionality in implementing a web survey project. In addition, some criteria that can help researchers choose the most appropriate application for their needs are proposed.
Our paper discusses the most important features of software tools for web surveys and provides an overview of the tools on the market. A random sample of software tools from the WebSM database (http://www.websm.org) was evaluated and the differences between free of charge and commercial tools are presented. It is shown that more expensive tools allow higher flexibility and better functionality in implementing a web survey project. In addition, some criteria that can help researchers choose the most appropriate application for their needs are proposed.
Access/Direct link Conference homepage (abstract)
Year of publication2006
Bibliographic typeConferences, workshops, tutorials, presentations
Full text availabilityNon-existant
Web Survey Bibliography - Lozar Manfreda, K. (80)
- Data quality of questions sensitive to social-desirability bias in web surveys; 2012; Lozar Manfreda, K., Zajc, N., Berzelak, N., Vehovar, V.
- Research design for studying online communities with web surveys; 2012; Petrovcic, A., Petric, G., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Effect of different stimulus on data quality in online panels; 2012; Zagar, S., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- WEBDATANET: A Network on Web-based Data Collection, Methodological Challenges, Solutions and Implementation...; 2012; Steinmetz, S., Kaczmirek, L., de Pedraza, P., Reips, U. -D., Tijdens, K., Lozar Manfreda, K., et, al...
- Advanced Paradata in Web Surveys: What Can They Tell about the Response Process?; 2012; Vehovar, V., Slavec, A., Berzelak, N., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Information-Communication Technology Support for Online Surveys: A Need for Integration; 2012; Vehovar, V., Slavec, A., Berzelak, N., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Global market of web survey software: Status, trends and issues; 2012; Vehovar, V., Slavec, A., Berzelak, N., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Paradata insight into survey response behaviour: An analysis of a set of hosted web surveys; 2012; Lozar Manfreda, K., Berzelak, N., Vehovar, V.
- Current Projects at University of Ljubljana; 2011; Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Nonresponse in Web Surveys ; 2011; Lozar Manfreda, K., Berzelak, N., Vehovar, V.
- Mobile Phones in an Environment of Competing Survey Modes: Applying Metric for Evaluation of Costs and...; 2010; Vehovar, V., Berzelak, N., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Cost-Error Optimization Model for Mixed-Mode Surveys; 2009; Vehovar, V., Berzelak, N., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Effectiveness of incentives in mixed-mode systems: An evaluation of errors & costs; 2009; Lozar Manfreda, K., Berzelak, N., Vehovar, V.
- Relations between functionality and usability of Web survey software tools: An empirical evaluation; 2009; Berzelak, N., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Empirical Evaluation of Web Survey Software Tools: Powerful or Friendly?; 2009; Vehovar, V., Berzelak, N., Lozar Manfreda, K., Horvat, T., Debevc, M.
- Optimising survey costs in mixed mode environment; 2009; Vehovar, V., Berzelak, N., Lozar Manfreda, K., Belak, E.
- Effectiveness of incentives in web surveys within mixed-mode systems: An evaluation of errors & costs...; 2009; Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Effectiveness of incentives in mixed-mode systems: An evaluation of errors & costs; 2009; Vehovar, V.; Lozar Manfreda, K.; Berzelak, N.
- Internet surveys; 2008; Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.
- What Can We Achieve With 5 Euros? Optimization of Survey Data Quality Using Mixed-Mode Approaches; 2008; Berzelak, N., Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Nonresponse in web surveys within the context of survey errors and survey costs; 2008; Berzelak, N., Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.
- Integration of the web into survey data collection: Balancing costs and errors; 2008; Vehovar, V., Berzelak, N., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Optimization of costs and errors in mixed-mode surveys; 2008; Vehovar, V., Berzelak, N., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Internet Surveys; 2008; Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Overview: Online Surveys; 2008; Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Measuring ego-centered social networks on the web: Questionnaire design issues ; 2008; Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., Koren, G., Hlebec, V.
- Internet surveys; 2008; Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., Koren, G.
- Web Surveys versus Other Survey Modes – A Meta-Analysis Comparing Response Rates; 2008; Lozar Manfreda, K., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., Vehovar, V.Berzelak, N.
- Nonresponse bei Web-Befragungen im Vergleich zu anderen Befragungsmodi - Eine Meta-Analytische Synthese...; 2006; Lozar Manfreda, K., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., Vehovar, V.Berzelak, N.
- Web Survey Methodology (WebSM) Portal; 2006; Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.
- Software tools for web surveys; 2006; Lozar Manfreda, K., Berzelak, J., Vehovar, V.
- The Quality of Survey Questions Published on Slovenian Journalistic Web Sites; 2006; Licen, S., Lozar Manfreda, K., Hlebec, V.
- Software Tools for Web Surveys: The More You Pay, the More You Get; 2006; Berzelak, J., Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.
- A meta-analysis of response rates in Web surveys compared to other survey modes; 2005; Lozar Manfreda, K., Bosnjak, M., Haas, I., Vehovar, V.
- The Quality of Survey Questions Published on Slovenian Journalistic Websites; 2005; Licen, S., Lozar Manfreda, K., Hlebec, V.
- Web survey response rates compared to other modes - A meta-analysis; 2005; Lozar Manfreda, K., Bosnjak, M., Haas, I., Vehovar, V.
- List-based Web Surveys: Quality, Timeliness, and Nonresponse in the Steps of the Participation Flow; 2004; Pratesi, M., Lozar Manfreda, K., Biffignandi, S., Vehovar, V.
- List-based Web Surveys: Quality, Timeliness, and Nonresponse in the Steps of the Participation Flow; 2004; Pratesi, M., Lozar Manfreda, K., Biffignandi, S., Vehovar, V.
- Design issues in collecting data on ego-centered social networks on the Web; 2004; Koren, G., Hlebec, V., Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Some basic experiments on presentation of questions and response options in Web questionnaires; 2004; Lozar Manfreda, K., Koren, G., Hlebec, V.
- Collecting Data on Ego-Centered Social Networks on the Web: Methodological Issues; 2004; Lozar Manfreda, K., Koren, G., Vehovar, V., Hlebec, V.
- A meta-analysis of response rates in Web surveys compared to other survey modes; 2004; Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.
- Mobile Phones As a Threat to The Survey Industry: An Example from Europe – The Case of Slovenia...; 2004; Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., Dolničar, V.
- Open-ended vs. Close-ended Questions in Web Questionnaires; 2003; Reja, U., Lozar Manfreda, K., Hlebec, V., Vehovar, V.
- Collecting Data on Ego-Centered Social Networks on the Web; 2003; Koren, G., Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V., Hlebec, V.
- New Approaches Towards Collecting Data On Ego-Centered Social Networks - Interactive Web Questionnaires...; 2003; Koren, G., Hlebec, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.
- Internet and non-internet sub-networks of intensive Internet users; 2003; Hlebec, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.
- Evaluating Unit nonresponse Rates in Web Surveys - A Meta Study; 2003; Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., Koren, G., Dolničar, V.
- Methodological issues in Web data collection of ego-centered networks; 2003; Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., Koren, G., Hlebec, V.
- Collecting Ego-Centered Network Data via the Web; 2002; Batagelj, Z., Hlebec, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.
