Web Survey Bibliography
A researcher seeking to conduct an online investigation can choose out of a large variety of tools that support the creating of, carrying out and the administration of such a project. Difficulties arise not by finding such a tool in general, but rather by finding an appropriate software for the specific needs in psychological research and especially in aptitude testing. For example, the possibility of giving feedback to a participant about his results on a certain scale is important for aptitude diagnostics, but creating such a feedback is al most never supported by the existing tools. The lack of such specific features can be explained by the fact that many tools have been developed for different (e.g. market research) or more general purposes. But since especially the high-quality tools are commercial products, and therefore closed software, they can not be adapted flexibly to specific requirements. In this context the software testMaker was developed specifically for psychological testing. For instance, it contains features such as time limits for a single items or scales as commonly used in achievement or self-evaluation tests, the use of multiple languages, or different ways of publishing a survey (direct access, registered access, TAN, password). Different possibilities to create an automatic feedback for the participant are an essential part of the software. Furthermore, testMaker provides a graphical user interface that enables researchers with out programming experience to create and customize a survey to an individual design. Common psychological concepts and terms such as tests, subtests, and items are represented. The software also offers a flexible permission system for research teams, and allows adaptive testing. Publication of the testMaker as an open source software is planned to take place when the main development is completed.
The implementation and use of these features are demonstrated on the example of web-based student guidance systems, so-called SelfAssessments, where prospective students can take part in several cognitive tests and non-cognitive questionnaires and receive a feedback about their aptitude for a certain field of study. The implementation and use of these features are demonstrated on the example of web-based student guidance systems, so-called SelfAssessments, where prospective students can take part in several cognitive tests and non-cognitive questionnaires and receive a feedback about their aptitude for a certain field of study.
Web Survey Bibliography - General Online Research Conference (GOR) 2007 (37)
- Online Factorial Surveys as an Approach for International Comparative Research; 2007; Berger, R., Burek, M.
- Pure Text vs. HTML in Email Invitations; 2007; Neubarth, W., Kaczmirek, L., Hellwig, O.
- The Usage of Magnitude Estimation Scales in Online Surveys - Results of a Joint Project; 2007; Althoff, S., Dumke, U.
- The Influence of Regulatory Focus and Other Personality Traits on the Participation in Online Surveys...; 2007; Stratmann, C., Verheyen, C.
- "Dirty Politics" Web Experiments on the Effects of Negative Communication Actions ; 2007; Tatzl, G.
- A Comparison of Visual Analog and Graphic Rating Scales ; 2007; Thomas, R. K., Couper, M. P.
- The Best of Intentions: Response Format Effects on Measures of Behavioral lntention ; 2007; Thomas, R. K., Klein, J. D., Behnke, C. S., Terhanian, G.
- New Market Insights by Analysing Public Online Communication ; 2007; Troemel, M.
- Media usage in the age of Web 2.0 ; 2007; Trump, T., Spahlinger, M. P.
- The impact of the duration of affiliation and the intensity of questioning on the willingness of participation...; 2007; Wachenfeld, A.
- From "Innavators" to "Laggards" - Diffusion of Unrestricted Surveys on the Web ; 2007; Wolsing, A., Faas, T.
- Is it all rubbish? Credibility of answers in web surveys ; 2007; Zajac, J., Rakocy, K., Nowak, A.
- Quality of Online Research: Does it Improve Results? ; 2007; Lindemann, M.
- SniperScale: Graphical scaling in data collection and its effect on the response behaviour of participants...; 2007; Luetters, H., Westphal, D., Heublein, F.
- Good intentions are very popular. They can always be used again. On forecasting of product potential...; 2007; Melles, T., Puetzfeld, S.
- testMaker An Open Source Tool for Web-based Aptitude Testing ; 2007; Milbradt, A., Zimmerhofer, A., Hornke, L. F.
- New Access to Information laws in Germany - a big bang for Computer-Assisted Reporting (CAR)? ; 2007; Redelfs, M.
- VASgenerator.net - A Web-Based Tool for Creating Visual Analogue Scales ; 2007; Reips, U. -D., Funke, F.
- Participation Motives of Online Panellists ; 2007; Rodenhausen, T., Kaufmann, G., Hartmann, A.
- Online research praxis: the role of online research at Yahoo! ; 2007; Gonzales, R.
- Reducing social desirability bias through indirect questioning in scena rios: When does it work in online...; 2007; Snijders, C., Matzat, U.
- Is Online Deception Really a Threat to Data Quality in Online Studies? Results from a Review; 2007; Stieger, S.
- Subjective Anonymity in Online-Surveys ; 2007; Strassnig, B.
- B2B Online Research in China ; 2007; Bumann, B.
- Peeping Over Computers The Slovenian Internet Audience Measurement Mix Model ; 2007; Cucin, P., Kropivnik, S., Hocevar, J.
- Can Open-Source Survey Tools be used in Wleb-based Market Research? ; 2007; Frichter, C.
- Dynamic Forms: Online Surveys 2.0 ; 2007; Funke, F., Reips, U. -D.
- Online Research 2.0 » Join the MindVoyage ; 2007; Gadeib, A., Lichter, C.
- Using Change to Improve Navigation in Grid Questions ; 2007; Galesic, M., Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., Conrad, F. G.
- The High Hurdie Technique Put to the Test: Do Artificially Increased Loading Times Enhance Data Quality...; 2007; Goeritz, A., Stieger, S.
- A closer look at the effect of recruitment methods on data quality for online panel surveys ; 2007; Irmer, C., Wenzel, O., Peichl, M.
- Sample and Method Effects: A Comparison between Off-line and On-line Collected Data ; 2007; Jarchow, C.
- Documentation of Online Surveys ; 2007; Kaczmirek, L., Neubarth, W., Bandilla, W., Watteler, O.
- Putting Social Psychological lncentives to Work: Motivation and Non-Monetary Incentives in Online Information...; 2007; Antin, J., Cheshire, C.
- The Impact of Screen Size and Background Color on Response in Web Surveys ; 2007; Baker, R. P., Couper, M. P.
- On whom do we rely? Personality traits and nonresponse in an online surve ; 2007; Bipp, T.
- Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis on the Internet: How Complex Should the Tasks Be? ; 2007; Brocke, M.