Web Survey Bibliography
Research Now has pioneered a series of parallel tests to determine whether Flash Tools improve data quality by examining how response rates and completion rates are impacted. Further, we seek to understand whether any data differences exist and if so, what are they and how should they be considered as Flash tools are implemented. The presentation will briefly review some of the Flash tools currently being used by online survey firms with the major focus on examining live results from the parallel tests.
Key questions addressed will be: How are response rates impacted when Flash is used? What about completion rates? How does actual data compare between surveys that include Flash programming versus those that do not? Is the data consistent? If not, is there an improvement with surveys containing Flash tools? In what ways is the data improved? How best can researchers address these differences and implement these tools? What about respondents? Does the use of flash improve their experience? Does it take respondents less time to complete a survey or more time? Does it matter? Are they more satisfied with the experience, such that they say so and respond better next time they are asked to participate in a survey?
The DMS session is one-third of this panel presentation. Our session will focus on using third-party technologies for validating online respondents. By validating the identities of survey takers, researchers can become more confident in their online research results. DMS will share learning and some data trends from our validation experience.
- View a more precise, more data driven understanding of how Flash tools impact on results
- Apply specific guidelines on how best to implement Flash tools
- Have a clear indication of how respondents react to these technologies and whether they are more responsive, satisfied, and engaged
Abstract (50th MRA Annual Conference and RIF 2007)
Web Survey Bibliography - Other new technologies (163)
- Using Web Ex to Conduct Usability Testing of an On-Line Survey Instrument; 2013; Stettler, K.
- Virtual research assistants: Replacing human interviewers by automated avatars in virtual worlds; 2013; Hasler, B. S., Tuchman, P., Friedman, D.
- From mixed-mode to multiple devices. Web surveys, smartphone surveys and apps: has the respondent gone...; 2013; Callegaro, M.
- Smartphone Apps and User Engagement: Collecting Data in the Digital Era; 2012; Link, M. W.
- Specific mixed-mode methodology to reach sensory disabled people in quantitative surveys; 2012; Fontaine, S.
- Facing The Future Webcams as a survey tool in China; 2012; Gordon, A., Llewellyn, T., Gu, E.
- Using screen video capture software to aide and inform cognitive interviewing; 2012; Chaney, B. H., Barry, A. E., Chaney, J. D., Stellefson, M. L., Webb, M. C.
- A report on the Confirmit Market Research Software Survey ; 2012; Macer, T., Wilson, S.Wilson, Sheila
- Comfortable in the new medium: How online qual can benefit from our share-happy culture ; 2012; Rubenstein, P.
- Appreciating the value of traditional research in a digital world; 2012; Turner, S.
- For winning qualitative, make it high-touch + high-tech; 2012; Barber, E., McIlrath, M.
- Using Collaborative Web Technology to Construct the Health Information National Trends Survey; 2012; Moser, R. P., Beckjord, E. B., Finney Rutten, L. J., Blake, K., Hesse, B. W.
- Testing Video Messages in Web Surveys: Effects on Sample Bias and Validity; 2012; Shapiro, D., Cappella, J.
- The Representativity of Web Surveys of the General Population compared to Traditional Modes and Mixed...; 2012; Klausch, L. T., Schouten, B., Hox, J.
- Time use data collection using Smartphones: Results of a pilot study among experienced and inexperienced...; 2012; Scherpenzeel, A., Sonck, N., Fernee, H., Morren, M.
- New Insights about market research with an iPad-panel; 2012; Manouchehri, A., Rieber, D., Moughrabi, C.
- Lessons to keep in mind when interviewing via Webcam; 2012; Carlon, M.
- Using Webinar Polls to Collect Online Survey Data: The Case of a Behavioral Finance Problem; 2012; Sahu, C.
- The benefits and constraints of e-mail interviews and discussions as methods of accessing valid data; 2011; Roberts, A.
- Facial imaging: The new face of online survey research; 2011; Gordon, A., McCallum, D., Sorci, M., Llewellyn, T.
- On Affordances and Technological Intersubjectivity; 2011; Vatrapu, R.
- Building online communities; 2011; Mlačić, B., Milas, G., Mikloušić, I.
- 2nd WEBDATANET Meeting Amsterdam. Global Data Collecting; 2011; van Beveren, I.
- Eye Tracking in testing questionnaires: What’s the added value?; 2011; Tries, S.
- Combining web surveys and XBRL ; 2011; Roos, M.
- Video enhanced web survey; 2011; Fuchs, M., Kunz, T., Gebhard, F.
- New data sources for statistics: Experiences at Statistics Netherlands; 2011; Daas, P., ten Bosch, O., de Blois, C., Hoekstra, R., Roos, M.
- The Future of Research Through Gaming; 2011; Adamou, B.
- Engagement, Consistency, Reach – why the Technology Landscape Precludes All Three; 2011; Johnson, A., Rolfe, G.
- Estudo de usabilidade para PDAs utilizados em coleta de dados nas entrevistas pessoais para pesquisas...; 2011; Patricia Zamprogno Tavares
- Researching Personal Information on the Public Web - Methods and Ethics; 2011; Wilkinson, D., Thelwall, M.
- A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face...; 2011; Dziuban, C. D., Moskal, P.
- Twitter mood predicts the stock market.; 2011; Bollen, J., Mao, H., Zeng, X.-J.
- The power of qualitative research in the era of social media; 2011; Branthwaite, A., Patterson, S.
- Web based CATI on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud and VirtualBox using queXS; 2011; Zammit, A.
- Web/Cloud Based CATI Using queXS; 2011; Zammit, A.
- Partnership-Driven Resources to Improve and Enhance Research (PRIMER): A Survey of Community-Engaged...; 2011; Dolor, R. J., Greene, S. M., Thompson, E., Baldwin, L.-M., Neale, A. V.
- Weaving the Web into Personal Communication Networks: A Mobile Phone Based Study of Smartphone Users; 2011; Kobayashi, T., Boase, J.
- Different functioning of rating scale formats – results from psychometric and physiological experiments...; 2011; Koller, M., Salzberger, T.
- Wireless Health Monitoring, Feedback, and Health Behaviors; 2011; Kooreman, P., Scherpenzeel, A.
- ELIPSS: A New Mobile Web Panel for Social Scientists; 2011; Lesnard, L.
- Measurement invariance in training evaluation: Old question, new context; 2011; P., Gissel, A., Stoughton, J. W., Whelan, T. J.Clark, A. P.
- Differential Mailing Methodologies on Response Rates: Testing Advance Notices, Blast Telephone Messages...; 2011; Gentry, R. J., Pens, Y.
- Which Technologies Do Respondents Use in Online Surveys – An International Comparison?; 2011; Kaczmirek, L., Behr, D., Bandilla, W.
- Method Effects and Robo-polls; 2011; van Lohuizen, J., Samohyl, R. W.
- Studying Political Behavior: A Comparison of Internet and Telephone Surveys; 2011; Stephenson, L. B., Crête, J.
- Use these five Web-based approaches to shrink your research timelines, costs ; 2011; Cutler, A. D.
- The impact of next and back buttons on time to complete and measurement reliability in computer-based...; 2010; Gershon, R. C. et al.
- ReCal: Intercoder Reliability Calculation as a Web Service ; 2010; Freelon, D. G.
- The impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary- and booklet...; 2010; Bonke, J., Fallesen, P.