Web Survey Bibliography
Confidentiality or privacy assurances may affect the answer tendencies in online surveys. In addition to direct effects e. g. on sensitive demographic variables, effects have been found on psychological constructs such as social desirability. The current study explores whether frequently assessed psychological constructs such as measures of personality (big 5) and emotional intelligence are also affected and whether these effects may be controlled by assessing social desirability. In the mixed experimental design the presentation of the privacy assurance (no assurance, detailed assurances as part of the instructions, detailed assurances instructions that are presented as an optional link) is manipulated. Personality and emotional intelligence are assessed between subjects while social desirability and demographic information are assessed within subjects. Personality is assessed with a self-report questionnaire (NEO-FFI). Emotional intelligence is assessed with a performance measure (TEMINT). Following a treatment check participants receive an individualized feedback.
Anonymitätszusicherungen und Datenschutzerklärungen können Auswirkungen auf das Antwortverhalten bei Onlinebefragungen haben. Neben direkten Effekten z.B. auf sensible demographische Variablen sind Auswirkungen auf psychologische Konstrukte wie die soziale Erwünschtheit gezeigt worden. Fragestellung der vorliegenden Studie ist, ob neben der sozialen Erwünschtheit auch häufig verwendete Konstrukte wie Persönlichkeitsmerkmale (Big 5) und emotionale Intelligenz beeinflusst werden und ob diese Effekte durch Erhebung der sozialen Erwünschtheit kontrolliert werden können.
In dem experimentellen Design wird die Darbietung der Anonymitätszusicherung manipuliert (keine Zusicherung, direkte detaillierte Zusicherung, detaillierte Zusicherung, die über einen Link eingesehen werden kann). Persönlichkeitsmerkmale (NEO-FFI) und emotionale Intelligenz (TEMINT) werden als between subject Variablen erhoben. Die Abfolge dieser Konstrukte, sozialer Erwünschtheit und demographischer Variablen (Einkommen, Wohnort, Alter, Geschlecht) werden within subjects variiert. Nach einem Treatment Check erhalten die Studienteilnehmenden eine individuelle Rückmeldung.
General online research (GOR) 2008 (abstract)
Web Survey Bibliography (6390)
- Online Print Publications And The Viabiity Of Charging For On Line Content ; 2009; Vogel, J., Lee-LeGassick, K., Shullman, B., D’Amico, T.
- Measuring Internet And Press Audience In The Media Convergence Era. In Search Of A New Paradigm In Researching...; 2009; Pawlak, J., Póltorak, M.
- The Decline And Fall Of The Response Rate: The Fightback ; 2009; Green, A., Staplehurst, S., Windle, R.
- Internet Measurement of Ad-noting: Sampling and Statistical Issues; 2009; Frankel, M. R., Baim, J., Galin, M., Agresti, J., Augemberg, K.
- A Structured Approach For Reducing Bias In Surveys Using Online Access Panels ; 2009; Farrer, N., Dayan, Y.
- In Search of Readers: A Brave New World For Researches; 2009; Crassweller, A., Rogers, J., Williams, D.
- Audipresse Premium: Using The Internet To Help Measure Press Readership ; 2009; Saint-Joanis, G., Néraudau, J.
- Questionnaire Intelligence: New Rules Of Engagement For Online Survey Design ; 2009; McMahon, L., Stamp, R.
- Presenting Publications in Online Print Audience Questionnaires; 2009; Carroll, J., Collins, S., Farrer, N.
- Can Lengthy Surveys Work Online? The Experience of TGI GB; 2009; Greene, D., Impedovo, D.
- Methodological Tests On Online Research: Incidence Of Formal Aspects/Questionnaire Layout On The Results...; 2009; Schmutz, B., Lê Van Truoc, O.
- Online Interviewing through Access Panel: Quantity and Quality Assurance; 2009; Petric, I., Appel, M., de Leeuw, E. D.
- Sample Surveys Based on Internet Panels: 8 Years of Learning; 2009; Baim, J., Galin, M., Frankel, M. R., Becker, R., Agresti, J.
- Panel research providers respond to questions about their survey-invitation practices; 2009; Bruzzone, D., Bookbinder, J.
- Mobile research - the fifth methodology?; 2009; Snaith, T.
- Research-on-research helps American Cancer Society assess the best modes for an ongoing study; 2009; Blais, L. M., Roller, M. R.
- The impact of gender in e-mailed survey invitations; 2009; Derham, P.
- Using interactive technology to improve online questionnaire design; 2009; Chen, T., Estrin, D.
- How Web 2.0 made a long survey more palatable; 2009; Hebard, A. J.
- Faster than a speeding survey: Part II: The physician's perspective; 2009; Maciolek, T., Palish, J.
- Faster than a speeding survey: Part I: Rules of the road for online research with physicians; 2009; Maciolek, T., Palish, J.
- An examination of strategies for panel-blending; 2009; Fallig, M. A., Allen, D.
- How do respondent behaviors and online sample quality affect measures of ad performance?; 2009; Bruzzone, D.
- The value of consistency auditing of online panels; 2009; Gittelmam, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
- 10 ways to keep your panel respondents happy; 2009; Hardy, N.
- Survey says: new tools aim to ensure the integrity of online surveys. ; 2009; Quenqua, D.
- Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys 2009; 2009; The American Association for Public Opinion Research
- College Experiences Survey: Methodological Summary. Final Report; 2009; DesRoches, D., Hall, J. W., Santos, B.
- Survey Platform: A Factor Influencing Online Survey Delivery and Response Rate ; 2009; Nair, C. S., Adams, P.
- Conference interpreters and their self-representation: A worldwide web-based survey ; 2009; Zwischenberger, C.
- What are They Asking Me? A Web Survey Experiment on Question Clarity and Measurement Error; 2009; Faas, T., Kaczmirek, L., Lenzner, A.
- Some Practical Issues in Cell Phone Interviewing from a Phone Room Perspective; 2009; Best, J., Hugick, L
- Measurement Error in Cell Phone Surveys; 2009; Kennedy, C., Everett, S. E., Traugott, M. W.
- Improving Response Rates on Both Landline and Cell Surveys Through the Strategic Use of Caller ID; 2009; Dayton, J. J., Burns, E., Levinson, A., Freedner, N., Hannah, K., Tarallo, B.
- Cell Phone Mainly and Cell Phone Mostly: A Comparison of Two Approaches to Dual Frame Cell Phone and...; 2009; Boyle, J., Cantor, J.
- PDA vs. Computer Web Survey Respondents; 2009; Stapleton, C
- Using Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing and Interactive Voice Response to Measure Elder Mistreatment...; 2009; Beach, S., Schultz, M., Degenholtz, H., Castle, N., Rosen, J., Fox, A., Meisel, A., Morycz, R.
- Exploring Inherent Differences Between CARI and Non-CARI Interviews; 2009; Sage, A., Keating, M.
- The Use of Advance Contact, Monetary Incentives, and Lotteries to Increase Response Rates in a Web Survey...; 2009; Stevenson, J., Dykema, J., Day, D., Bonham, V., Sellers, S.
- The Effect of Email Invitation Subject Title and Text on Online Survey Completion Rates in Internet...; 2009; Kruse, Y., Thomas, M., Nukulkij, P., Callegaro, M.
- Words, Numbers and Visual Heuristics in Web Surveys: Is There a Hierarchy of Importance?; 2009; Toepoel, V., Dillman, D. A.
- Web of Caring: Development of Web-Survey Best Practices; 2009; Ballou, J., Roff, B.
- Cell-Only Adults Versus Cell-Mostly Adults: Does It Make a Difference in the Results; 2009; Battaglia, M. P., Frankel, M. R., Balluz, L. S.
- Shifting Samples: The Impact of Wireless Substitution on National Estimates in RDD Surveys; 2009; Hannah, K.
- The Coverage Bias of Mobile Web Surveys; 2009; Fuchs, M.
- Refined or Biased Opinions? Examining Self-Selected Participation in Deliberation and Post-Survey in...; 2009; Wang, R., Siu, A.
- Mechanisms of Nonresponse in Cell Phone Surveys; 2009; Kennedy, C., Everett, S. E., Traugott, M. W.
- The Introduction of a Cell Phone Oversample to the Ohio Family Health Survey: Covering the Undercovered...; 2009; Duffy, T., Iachan, R., Bausch, S., Muzzy, S., ZuWallack, R. S.
- Examining the Relationship Between Survey Response Elicitation Efforts, Response Motivation, and Satisficing...; 2009; Lee, G., Rao, K.
- An Experiment in Using Prepaid Cell Phones to Interview Households Without an Available Phone Number; 2009; Brooks, K., Jaszczak, A., Wooten, K.