Web Survey Bibliography
Does it pay to pay online panel members? Two longitudinal experiments were conducted with an online panel to examine whether per-person payments via the online intermediary PayPal influence response and retention rates. Experiment 1 was a two-wave study. In the incentive condition, participants were promised 2 EUR to be paid upon completion of both waves, whereas control participants were not offered any incentive. For Wave 1, the promise of a payment had a negative effect on response, but a positive effect on retention. There was no direct effect on response and retention at Wave 2. Experiment 2 was a three-wave study. In the incentive condition, participants were promised 1.50 EUR for their participation at each wave, whereas in the control condition, participants were not offered any incentive. The promise of a payment had a negative effect on response in Wave 1, but a positive one on response in Wave 2. The payment had no significant effect on retention. In both experiments, retention at a given wave was found to be an indicator for response at the next wave, in that participants who dropped out at a given wave were less likely to respond at the next wave.
Conference homepage (abstract)
Web survey bibliography - Goeritz, A. (24)
- Response Effects of Prenotification, Prepaid Cash, Prepaid Vouchers, and Postpaid Vouchers: An Experimental...; 2015; van Veen, F.; Goeritz, A.; Sattler, S.
- Determinants of the starting rate and the completion rate in online panel studies; 2014; Goeritz, A.
- Online panel research: History, concepts, applications and a look at the future; 2014; Callegaro, M., Baker, R., Bethlehem, J., Goeritz, A., Krosnick, J. A., Lavrakas, P. J.
- The Use of Paradata to Predict Future Cooperation in a Panel Study; 2014; Funke, F., Goeritz, A.
- Incentive effects; 2013; Goeritz, A.
- How Do Lotteries and Study Results Influence Response Behavior in Online Panels?; 2013; Goeritz, A., Luthe, S. C.
- Reminders in Web-Based Data Collection: Increasing Response at the Price of Retention?; 2012; Goeritz, A., Crutzen, R.
- Does social desirability compromise self-reports of physical activity in web-based research?; 2011; Crutzen, R., Goeritz, A.
- Handle with Care: The Impact of Using Java Applets in Web-Based Studies on Dropout and Sample Composition...; 2011; Stieger, S., Goeritz, A., Voracek, M.
- Web panels: Replacement technology for market research; 2010; Goeritz, A.
- Social desirability and self-reported health risk behaviors in web-based research: three longitudinal...; 2010; Crutzen, R., Goeritz, A.
- The Effects of Different Incentives on Data Quantity and Data Quality in Online Panels; 2010; Singh, R. K., Voggeser, B. J., Goeritz, A.
- The longitudinal effect of incentives on participation and data quality in online panels; 2010; Neumann, B. P., Goeritz, A.
- The influence of the field time on data quality in list-based Web surveys; 2009; Goeritz, A., Stieger, S.
- Using online panels to conduct Web-based research: What works and what doesn’t; 2009; Goeritz, A.
- Distortion of demographics through technically induced dropout in restricted online surveys; 2009; Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Goeritz, A.
- Payments via Paypal as an Incentive in Online Panels; 2009; Goeritz, A., Wolff, H.-G., Goldstein, D. G.
- Using the World-Wide Web to obtain large-scale word norms: 190,212 ratings on a set of 2,654 German...; 2009; Lahl, O., Goeritz, A., Pietrowsky, R., Rosenberg, J.
- Individual payments as a longer-term incentive in online panels ; 2008; Goeritz, A., Wolff, H.-G., Goldstein, D. G.
- The effects of incentives in internet panels: a review; 2008; Goeritz, A.
- Cash Lotteries as Incentives in Online Panels; 2006; Goeritz, A.
- Meta-Analyses on Contingent versus Unconditional Incentives; 2005; Goeritz, A.
- Recruitment for online access panels; 2004; Goeritz, A.
- The impact of material incentives on response quantity, response quality, sample composition, survey...; 2004; Goeritz, A.