Web Survey Bibliography
Title Web-based Surveys in Logistics Research: An Empirical Application
Author Grant, D. B., Teller, C., Teller, W.
Source In: Kotzab, H., Seuring, S., Mueller, M. and Reiner, G. (eds.): Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management. Physica-Verlag HD.
Year 2006
Access date 08.09.2009
Abstract
The use of surveys continues to lead logistics and supply chain management research. We discuss the use of Internet or Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional survey methods in the context of a Web-based empirical study to identify advantages, disadvantages and limitations of this approach. We demonstrate that this approach has numerous technological and methodological advantages to improve not only internal validity but also external validity. Based on a literature survey, we identify different advantages and validate them by presenting the results of a Web-based survey that was conducted in a typical logistics research setting.
Access/Direct link
Homepage (abstract)
Year of publication2006
Bibliographic typeBook section
Full text availabilityAvailable on request
Web Survey Bibliography - 2006 (246)
- Adult gadget ownership over time (2006-2012); 2012
- Web-based survey techniques. A synthesis of Transit practice; 2006
- Web 2.0 & panels. The shift from lectures to conversations; 2006; Cook, M., Buckley, N.
- Unproctored internet testing in employment settings; 2006; Tippins, N. T. et al.
- Understanding people. Sample matching; 2006; Rivers, D.
- The power of the visible: Visual design for Web surveys; 2006; Couper, M. P.
- The power of survey design: A user's guide for managing surveys, interpreting results, and influencing...; 2006; Iarossi, G.
- The internet response method: Impact on the Canadian Census of population data; 2006; Roy, L., Laroche, D.
- The effect of conditioning when re-interviewing; 2006; Cartwright, T., Nancarrow, C.
- The anonymous elect. Market research through online access panels; 2006; Postoaca, A.
- Testing on the Internet: Issues, challenges and opportunities in the field of occupational assessment...; 2006; Bartram, D.
- Statistics for real-life sample surveys: non-simple-random samples and weighted data; 2006; Dorofeev, S., Grant, P.
- SMS and WAP: The shortcut to fast and better research response?; 2006; Pearson, C. et al.
- Sample matching. Representative sampling from Internet panels; 2006; Rivers, D.
- Research-based web design & usability guidelines; 2006
- Research quality: The next MR industry challenge; 2006; Dedeker, K.
- Rating scale format choices for multi-item measures: Does numbering and balanced-ness matter?; 2006; Meric, H., Wagner, J.
- Order effects in batteries of questions; 2006; Siminski, P.
- Optimizing quality in the use of web-based and computer based testing for personnel selection; 2006; Hornke, L. F., Kersting, M.
- Online marketing research; 2006; Miller, J.
- Need for high quality auxiliary data service for improving the quality of editing and imputation...; 2006; Laaksonen, S.
- Microsoft sues testing material vendors; 2006; Johnston, S. J.
- Introduction to the Special Issue on the ITC - Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing...; 2006; Coyne, I., Bartram, D.
- International Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing; 2006
- How successful I am depends on what number I get: The effects of numerical scale labels and need for...; 2006; Yan, T.
- Greenfield unveils real-time sampling; 2006
- Global market research 2006; 2006
- F-Shaped pattern for reading web content; 2006; Nielsen, J.
- Blocked versus randomized format of questionnaires. A confirmatory multigroup analysis; 2006; Sparfeldt, J. R., Schilling, S. R., Rost, D. H., Rost, D. H., Thiel, A.
- Benefits and challenges of multi-sourcing. Understanding differences between sample sources; 2006; de Gaudemar, O.
- Behavioral self-report measures. International extensions; 2006; Thomas, R. K., Klein, J. D.
- Attitudinal differences. Comparing people who belong to multiple versus single panels; 2006; Casdas, D., Fine, B., Menictas, C.
- Assessing individual respondents' quality. An innovative scoring system; 2006; Loeb, C.,Hartmann, A.
- Advanced techniques and technologies in online research; 2006; Allred, C. R.; Smith, J.; Smith, S. M.
- A framework for survey breakoffs; 2006; Peytchev, A.
- Assessing Panel Bias in the Knowledge Networks Panel: Updated Results from 2005 Research ; 2006; Pineau, V., Nukulkij, P., Tang, X.
- The Handbook of Marketing Research. Uses, Misuses, and Future Advances.; 2006; Grover, R., Vriens, M.
- Time in Sample: Searching for Conditioning in a Consumer Panel ; 2006; Arens, Z., Miller-Steiger, D.
- Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys 2006; 2006
- A Critical Assessment of Online Survey Tools; 2006; Marra, R. M., Bogue, B.
- A dynamic technique for conducting online survey-based research; 2006; Bonometti, R. J., Tang, J.
- The 2006 Confirmit Annual MR Software Survey; 2006; Macer, T.; Wilson, Sheila
- Online community survey: an effectiveness measure for revealing citizen preferences in their role as...; 2006; Martin Juanil, D., Ismail, M.
- Blaise – Alive and kicking for 20 years; 2006; Bethlehem, J., Hofman, L.
- Physical or Virtual Presence of the Experimenter: Psychological Online-Experiments in Different Settings...; 2006; Ollesch, H., Heineken, E., Schulte, F. P.
- Internet Science and Open Access: First Day of a Honeymoon ; 2006; Reips, U. -D., Matzat, U.
- Mplus; 2006; Muthen, L. K., Muthen, B. O.
- The Mode Effect: A Literature Review of Human and Technological Issues in Computerized Testing; 2006; Leeson, H. V.
- Feasibility, reliability, and validity of adolescent health status measurement by the Child Health Questionnaire...; 2006; Raat, H., Mangunkusumo, R. T., Landgraf, J. M., Kloek, G., Brug, J.
- What Difference Do Guidelines Make? An Observational Study of Online-questionnaire Design Guidelines...; 2006; Lumsden, J., Flinn, S., Anderson, M., Morgan, W.