Web Survey Bibliography - Weighting & imputation (264)

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6

• Applying maximum entropy weighting to on line panel data collection; 2011; Bianchi, A., Biffignandi, S., Hartmann, E., Sekhon, J.
• More comparisons of Probability and Non-Probability Sample Internet Surveys: The Dutch NOPVO Study.; 2011; Weiss, R., Krosnick, J. A., Yeager, D. S.
• Web Survey Live Validations - What Are They Doing?; 2011; Crawford, S. D.; McClain, C.
• Estimating Propensity Adjustments for Volunteer Web Surveys; 2011; Valliant, R. L., Dever, J. A.
• Can web surveys provide an adequate alternative to phone and face to face surveys?; 2011; Bethlehem, J.
• A Method for Evaluating Mode Effects in Mixed-mode Surveys; 2011; Vannieuwenhuyze, J., Loosveldt, G., Molenberghs, G.
• Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and...; 2011; Yeager, D. S., Krosnick, J. A., Chang, L. C., Javitz, H. S., Levindusky, M. S., Simpser, A.; Wang, R...
• The weirdest people in the world?; 2010; Heine, S. J., Henrich, J., Norenzayan, A.
• The Gallup Poll: Public opinion 2009; 2010; Gallup, A. M.
• Real ID. State of The Art Representative and Repeatable Online Samples. Behaviorally Profiled Respondents...; 2010; Gittelman, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
• Measuring the group quarters population in the American Community Survey: Interim report; 2010; Marton, K., Voss, P. R.
• Disclosure standards; 2010
• Online panel survey, Change and stability of political attitudes; 2010
• Weighting Strategy for Understanding Society; 2010; Lynn, P., Kaminska, O.
• Walking in Facebook: A Case Study of Unbiased Sampling of OSNs; 2010; Gjoka, M., Kurant, M., Butts, C. T., Markopoulou, A.
• Web Surveys in the Social Sciences: An Overview ; 2010; Frippiat, D., Marquis, N.
• Normalized Database Structure to Support Survey Fulfillment Operations; 2010; Sikes, N., Pittman, J., Hazel, K.
• Using a Simulation Study to Examine Strategies for Combining Cell and Landline Survey Samples; 2010; Duffy, T., Bausch, S., Iachan, R., Lu, B.
• Potentials and Constraints of Propensity Score Weighting to Improve Web Survey Quality; 2010; Steinmetz, S., Tijdens, K.
• Using Propensity Score Weighting to Reduce Bias of a Swiss Market Research Web Panel; 2010; Wiegand, G., Jella, H., Beat, H., Stefan, L.
• Potentials and Constraints of Propensity Score Weighting to Improve Web Survey Quality; 2010; Steinmetz, S., Tijdens, K.
• Influence of Outliers on Some Multiple Imputation Methods; 2010; Quintano, C., Castellano, R., Rocca, A.
• Statistical foundations of cell-phone surveys; 2010; Wolter, K., Smith, P., Blumberg, S. J.
• Using KnowledgePanel® to Improve the Sample Representativeness and Accuracy of Opt-in Panel Data...; 2010; Dennis, J. M., Peugh, J., Graham, P.
• Selection Bias in Web Surveys; 2010; Bethlehem, J.
• A Spanish Continuous Volunteer Web Survey: Sample Bias, Weighting and Efficiency; 2010; de Pedraza, P., Tijdens, K., de Bustillo, R., Steinmetz, S.
• Sampling of populations: methods and applications, 4th Edition; 2009; Levy, P. S., Lemeshow, S.
• comScore Media Metrix U.S. Methodlogy. An ARF research review; 2009; Cook, W. A., Pettit, R.
• Computing weights for the American National Election Study survey data; 2009; Debell, M., Krosnick, J. A.
• Internet Measurement of Ad-noting: Sampling and Statistical Issues; 2009; Frankel, M. R., Baim, J., Galin, M., Agresti, J., Augemberg, K.
• A Structured Approach For Reducing Bias In Surveys Using Online Access Panels ; 2009; Farrer, N., Dayan, Y.
• Online Interviewing through Access Panel: Quantity and Quality Assurance; 2009; Petric, I., Appel, M., de Leeuw, E. D.
• College Experiences Survey: Methodological Summary. Final Report; 2009; DesRoches, D., Hall, J. W., Santos, B.
• Does Weighting Improve the Accuracy of Data from Non- Probability Internet Survey Panels of People Who...; 2009; Yeager, D. S., Krosnick, J. A.
• Estimating Local Phone Service Percentages: How to Weight the Data from a Local, Dual-Frame Sample Survey...; 2009; Guterbock, T. M.
• Wireless and Wireline: Dual Frame Implications for Sample Design Decisions on Estimates, Weighting and...; 2009; Benford, R., Tompson, T., Feinberg, B., Feinberg, G., Weber, A., Speulda, N., Fleury, C.
• Cell Phone Mainly Households: Coverage and Reach for Telephone Surveys Using RDD Landline Samples; 2009; Boyle, J., Lewis, F., Tefft, B.
• National Surveys Via RDD Telephone Interviewing vs. the Internet: Comparing Sample Representativeness...; 2009; Chang, L. C., Krosnick, J. A.
• Indicators for the representativeness of survey response; 2009; Schouten, B., Cobben, F., Bethlehem, J.
• Do we hear different voices?: Investigating the differences between internet and non-internet users...; 2009; Zhang, C., Callegaro, M., Thomas, M., DiSogra, C.
• Summary of KnowledgePanel® Design; 2009; Dennis, J. M.
• Is a cell phone really a personal device? Results from the first wave of a mobile phone panel on sharing...; 2009; Fuchs, M., Busse, B.
• Online Analysis and Programmed Disclosure Risk Protection: New Access to Restricted-use Microdata; 2009; McFarland O’Rourke, J., Rush, S. H., Maxwell, C.
• Comparing different weighting procedures for volunteer online panels - Lessons to be learned from German...; 2009; Steinmetz, S., Tijdens, K., de Pedraza, P.
• Selection bias in Internet panels: challenge or dead blow?; 2009; Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J.
• Sampling Frame Coverage and Domain Adjustment Procedures for Internet Surveys; 2009; Asan, Z., Ayhan, H. O.
• Propensity Score Matching to Correct Telephone Surveys for Cell Phone Nonresponse; 2009; Bremer, J.
• An experiment on the effects of non-response reweighting on estimators' precision in a web survey; 2009; Fabrizi, E., Biffignandi, S., Toninelli, D.
• Use of Web surveys in Official Statistics; 2009; Bethlehem, J.
• Combining Data from Probability and Non-Probability Samples Using Pseudo-Weights; 2009; Elliott, M. R.

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6