Web Survey Bibliography
The objective of this work is to study, de ne and compare alternative sampling frames (population lists) for the representative population coverage as a base for sample selection in internet surveys. In addition, the study aims to provide a methodology for the domain adjustment procedures which enables to use the latest available information. There are several types of sampling frames such as target population frame and available list frame. The target population frames are the ideal frame, which cannot easily be obtained. On the other hand, total population list frames can be either household or individual unit based. The quality of the existing sampling frames can be can be dierent. The sampling frames may be; unde ned, ill de ned, partially de ned, or perfectly de ned.
The target population of the sample information collected from internet surveys (e-mail surveys & web surveys) faces many diculties in the identi cation of the possible sampling frame. For voluntary participation, one has to identify the coverage of the target population. Within the available data sources, special adjustments are proposed for the small domains. Some basic variables can be proposed for this purpose. Adjustments can be made for gender breakdown, age groups, and education groups. In terms of sample selection, the type of access to internet surveys can be based on several limitations. Early attempts was based on the restricted access designs for e-mail survey, or e-mail message followed with a web survey. As an alternative, voluntary participation designs became common for web surveys. In this type of design, observations are obtained through haphazard entry to the web survey questionnaire. Therefore, a probability sample cannot be obtained, due to unknown selection probabilities. Alternative data adjustment procedures for the case of voluntary participation is proposed in this study. Several types of weighted location estimators are proposed on the basis of these designs. For surveys having complex sample designs, a combined ratio mean (proportion, mean, or ratio) or separate ratio mean alternatives can be proposed. The overall selection probabilities for households can be determined by obtaining household based information from the population information for each domain. This information can be obtained by dividing the total population of each domain by the corresponding average household size for this domain. The overall selection probability of the domains will be their overall sampling fractions. From the previous experience with the
variability of the average household sizes in dierent domains, an alternative approach is also proposed. Due to the unavailability of the census data as Urban and Rural, it was decided to evaluate the available version as City (province centre & district centre) versus Village (sub-district centre & village).
In this study, alternative sampling frames are compared for their population coverage and representation for sample selection in internet surveys. The work also aims to provide a methodology for the domain adjustment procedures which also enables to eliminate the sample selection bias on the basis of the corrected information.
Conference homepage(abstract)
Web Survey Bibliography - European survey research associaton conference 2009, ESRA, Warsaw (37)
- An experimental mixed mode design on a general population survey ; 2009; Eva, G.
- Presentation of a Single Item versus a Grid: Effects on the Vitality and Mental Health Scales of the...; 2009; Callegaro, M., Shand-Lubbers, J., Dennis, J. M.
- Survey Research in Virtual Worlds: Second Life R as a Research Platform; 2009; Hill, C., Dean, E.
- Elderly in an Internet panel, the quality of the data; 2009; Vis, C.
- Computer-Assisted Audio Recording (CARI): Repurposing a Tool for Evaluating Comparative Instrument Design...; 2009; Edwards, B., Hicks, W., Tourangeau, K., Harris-Kojetin, L., Moss, A.
- Do online translated questionnaires result in higher response rates for patient surveys?; 2009; Boyd, J., Davis, A.
- A comparison of two mixed mode designs: cati-capi and web-cati-capi; 2009; Beukenhorst, D., Wetzels, W.
- Comparison between Liss panel (web) and ESS data (face to face); 2009; Revilla, M., Saris, W. E.
- Is a cell phone really a personal device? Results from the first wave of a mobile phone panel on sharing...; 2009; Fuchs, M., Busse, B.
- Mobile Phone Surveys in Germany – Response rates and response behaviour; 2009; Hader, S., Schneiderat, G.
- Ethical Considerations in the Use of Paradata in Web Surveys; 2009; Couper, M. P., Singer, E.
- Interviewer voice characteristics and productivity in telephone surveys; 2009; Best, H., Bauer, G., Steinkopf, L.
- Standardized recall aids for online life course surveys; 2009; Glasner, T.
- The impact of forgiving wording and question context on social desirability bias in sensitive surveys...; 2009; Naher, A.- F., Krumpal, I.
- Interactive feedback can improve accuracy of responses in web surveys; 2009; Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., Galesic, M.
- Increasing Confidence in Survey Estimates with Visual Analogue Scales; 2009; Funke, F., Reips, U. -D., Thomas, R. K.
- Effectiveness of incentives in mixed-mode systems: An evaluation of errors & costs; 2009; Lozar Manfreda, K., Berzelak, N., Vehovar, V.
- The influence of the field time on data quality in list-based Web surveys; 2009; Goeritz, A., Stieger, S.
- Twisting Rating Scales: Horizontal versus Vertical Visual Analogue Scales versus Categorical Scales...; 2009; Funke, F., Reips, U. -D.
- Online Analysis and Programmed Disclosure Risk Protection: New Access to Restricted-use Microdata; 2009; McFarland O’Rourke, J., Rush, S. H., Maxwell, C.
- Using the Available On-line Secondary Data in Education and Research Practice; 2009; Perek-Bialas, J.
- Nice portal! But where is the data . . . ? - Experiences of a data archive with offering online access...; 2009; Mauer, R.
- Making Use of Online Survey Documentation & Analysis; 2009; Terwey, M.
- Access to Survey Data on the Internet; 2009; Kolsrud, K.
- Individual Follow-up of the Target Population: the Plural Strategies of a Web Survey; 2009; Markou, E., de Cledat, B., Razafindratsima, N., Laurent, R., Issenhuth, P.
- The influence of selective nonresponse in the analysis of levels of annoyance and sleep disturbance...; 2009; Breugelmans, O.
- Motivating different groups: questionnaire topic and participation rates; 2009; Marchand, M.
- How to cover the general public by Internet interviewing; 2009; Das, M.
- The Internet sample; 2009; Getka-Wilczynska, E.
- Comparing different weighting procedures for volunteer online panels - Lessons to be learned from German...; 2009; Steinmetz, S., Tijdens, K., de Pedraza, P.
- Selection bias in Internet panels: challenge or dead blow?; 2009; Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J.
- Presentation of WEBSURVNET; 2009; de Pedraza, P., Steinmetz, S., Tijdens, K.
- Telephone Survey and political behaviour estimates in 22 European countries: Evaluating the need for...; 2009; Hufken, V.
- Self-Selected Samples in Customer Satisfaction Surveys; 2009; Nicolini, G., Dalla Valle, L.
- What to do if Probability Sampling is Impossible in a Web Survey?; 2009; Markou, E., Razafindratsima, N., de Cledat, B., Issenhuth, P., Laurent, R.
- Sampling Frame Coverage and Domain Adjustment Procedures for Internet Surveys; 2009; Asan, Z., Ayhan, H. O.
- New Challenges in Sampling: Introduction; 2009; Laaksonen, S.