Web Survey Bibliography
In Official Statistics, household and personal surveys gain increasingly in importance. A survey of great significance is for example EU-SILC, a study about poverty, social exclusion and living conditions in Europe. The sampling frame in Germany for this survey is the Official Statistics‟ Access Panel - called the ”Dauerstichprobe” (DSP) - that is conducted by the German Federal Statistical Office (DESTATIS). One problem in sampling from the AP is the voluntary participation and the resulting self-selection in the recruitment process. Thus, certain groups in the population (such as entrepreneurs, pensioner, etc.) are less willing to participate.
As a result of possibly low response propensities, one would expect biased and inefficient point and variance estimates. For that reason, it is important to take these propensities into consideration and investigate the influence of the response rate (i.e. the rate itself as well as the response pattern) on the given estimates.
The present paper will therefore address point and variance estimation of means and total values (e.g. of income) in different access panel participation scenarios using different estimation strategies. Based on the latest estimation results from the partner‟s response propensity estimates (cf. Rendtel/Amarov, FU Berlin) and on earlier work of the DACSEIS project (cf. http://www.dacseis.de), several scenarios will be implemented and examined within a Monte-Carlo simulation study.
Conference homepage (abstract)
Web Survey Bibliography - Internet access Panels (461)
- A Comparison Web Study to Examine Panel Reuse Effects in an Advertising Tracking Study; 2011; Brewer, L., Jacobe, A., Marsh, S. M., Turner, S., Vakalia, F.
- Quality of a probability-based online panel for the social sciences in Germany: first results.; 2011; Bandilla, W., Kaczmirek, L., Schaurer, I., Struminskaya, B.
- Answer behavior in a probability based internet panel; 2011; Vis, C., Wijnant, A.
- Can Tailor-made Questions Motivate Respondents in an Internet Panel?; 2011; Oudejans, M.
- Why do Internet panel members become inactive and how can they be re-activated?; 2011; Scherpenzeel, A.
- Noncoverage and Nonresponse in a Probability Based Mixed-Mode Access Panel; 2011; Bartsch, S., Engel, U., Vehre, H.,
- Surveying the General Population: Coverage bias in European Web Surveys; 2011; de Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J., Mohorko, A.
- Examination of Panel Conditioning Effects in a Web-Based 2007-2008 Election Study.; 2011; Dennis, J. M., Kruse, Y., Tompson, T.
- Response Quantity, Response Quality, and Costs of Building an Online Panel via Social Contacts.; 2011; Toepoel, V.
- The Use of Web Panels to Characterize Rare Conditions.; 2011; Boyle, J.
- Same Family, Different Planet: Comparing the Views of Teens and Parents on Their Relationship and Potential...; 2011; Vaughan, R., Feinstein, E. C., Peugh, J., Shand-Lubbers, J.
- Category Selection Probing in Online Access Panels.; 2011; Behr, D., Kaczmirek, L., Braun, M., Bandilla, W.
- Results of a Survey Experiment on Frequency Reporting: Religious Service Attendance from the 2010 ANES...; 2011; Debell, M., Figueroa, L.
- Are you who you say you are? Using a Multisource Cross-validation Methodology for Panel Membership Information...; 2011; Rao, K., Dolson, T., Kinnucan, M.
- Differential Sampling Based on Historical Individual-Level Data in Online Panels.; 2011; Kelly, R. H.
- How Can We Believe What They Say? The Role of Missing and Validating Data in Panelists; 2011; Rao, K.
- Re-Examining the Validity of Different Survey Modes for Measuring Public Opinion in the U.S.: Findings...; 2011; Ansolabehere, S.; Fraga, B.; Schaffner, B. F.
- Does question order influence sensitivity to scope? Empirical findings from a web-based contingent valuation...; 2011; Nielsen, J. S., Kjaer, T.
- Formative Research on MySpace: Online Methods to Engage Hard-to-Reach Populations ; 2011; Levine, D., Madsen, A., Wright, E., Barar, R. E., Santelli, J., Bull, S.
- Estimating Propensity Adjustments for Volunteer Web Surveys; 2011; Valliant, R. L., Dever, J. A.
- Use these five Web-based approaches to shrink your research timelines, costs ; 2011; Cutler, A. D.
- Online qualitative approaches: an appraisal; 2011; Parker, K.
- The impact of next and back buttons on time to complete and measurement reliability in computer-based...; 2010; Gershon, R. C. et al.
- Research synthesis. AAPOR report on online panels; 2010; Brick, J. M. et al.
- Recruiting probability samples for a multi-mode research panel with Internet and mail components; 2010; Rao, K.
- Real ID. State of The Art Representative and Repeatable Online Samples. Behaviorally Profiled Respondents...; 2010; Gittelman, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
- Overview of data collection methodology; 2010
- Machines that lean how to code open ended survey data; 2010; Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.
- Ekos' observation of MRIA study - Canadian online panels: similar or different?; 2010
- The Future of Internet Research; 2010; Lavrakas, P. J.
- Why are we trying to create new communities for market research purposes?; 2010; Pearson, C., Kateley, V.
- Online panel survey, Change and stability of political attitudes; 2010
- The Internet, Electoral Politics and Citizen Participation in Global Perspective; 2010; Gibson, R., Cantijoch, M.
- Challenges in Reaching Hard-to-Reach Groups in Internet Panel Research; 2010; Marchand, M., Vis, C.
- How Representative Are Online Panels? Problems of Coverage and Selection and Possible Solutions; 2010; Bethlehem, J., Scherpenzeel, A.
- True Longitudinal and Probability-Based Internet Panels: Evidence from the Netherlands; 2010; Das, M., Scherpenzeel, A.
- Continuity and Innovation in the Design of Understanding Society: the UK Household Longitudinal Study...; 2010; Laurie, H.
- Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 2: Results from Methodological Experiments ; 2010; Burton, J., Laurie, H., Uhrig, S.C. N.
- Update on the ARF’s Quality Enhancement Process (QeP); 2010; Pettit, R.
- From clipboards to online research communities; 2010; Poynter, R., Cierpicki, S., Lorch, J., Zuo, B., Davis, C., Eddy, C.
- Digital, Social Moms: Using Social Media to Increase Respondent Engagement and Decrease Recruiting Costs...; 2010; Stemberg, C., Rimmer, L., Weinstein, D.
- How is Emerging Technology/Web 2.0 Changing Gathering Consumer Feedback and the Delivery of Data? ; 2010; Price, K., Patel, N.
- Factorial Design on Survey Router Configuration Effect by Sample Source; 2010; Fawson, B., Johnson, E. P.
- Participant Satisfaction and Panel Member Retention; 2010; Portner, A.
- Conditioning Effects in Online Communities; 2010; Cape, P. J.
- Looking Beyond Quality Differences: How Do Consumer Buying Patterns Differ by Sample Source?; 2010; Baker-Prewitt, J.
- Recruiting Online Panel Members from a Mail survey in the General Population: Results from an Exploratory...; 2010; Reuband, K.H.
- An Examination of Panel Conditioning in an Advertising Tracking Study with Cross-Sectional Design; 2010; Anderson, A. J., Marsh, K. A., Turner, S., Marsh, S. M.
- Representing Seniors in an Online National Probability Panel Survey: Measuring Technology Attitudes...; 2010; Peugh, J., Mansfield, W., Wells, T., Semans, K.
- Communicating Disclosure Risk in Informed Consent Statements; 2010; Singer, E., Couper, M. P.

