Web Survey Bibliography
This paper reports on the results of an experiment that investigated the response rate and data quality effects of two alternative methods for making initial contact with potential respondents in a sample survey. The study was conducted in a university setting and selected students were initially contacted about their participation in the survey either thru an e-mail message or thru their own customised university portal. Survey findings revealed that the e-mail alternative resulted in a significantly higher overall response rate. However, the findings also revealed that there were significant differences in the responses of the two groups with respect to the evaluations given by students regarding their academic and social well-being at the university. Specifically, sample members in the portal group gave significantly more positive evaluations regarding their academic and social well-being than did members of the e-mail group. However, there were no significant differences between the responses of the two groups in terms of their evaluations of either the university‟s food court or the campus recreational centre. Additionally, despite efforts within both groups to achieve a high response rate and a representative sample, neither alternative was able to produce a sample that had a high response rate or a sample that was representative of the population in terms of either students‟ gender or grade point average. Implications of these findings for conducting surveys, especially those of student populations, are also discussed.
Journal homepage (abstract)
Web Survey Bibliography - Email surveys (321)
- Ten questions to ask your online survey provider; 2013; Williams, D.
- Survey quality prediction system 2.0; 2013
- The E-Interview in Qualitative Research; 2013; Bampton, R., Cowton, C., Downs, Y.
- Methodological Considerations of Qualitative Email Interviews; 2013; Nehls, K.
- What we can learn from unintentional mobile respondents; 2012; Peterson, G.
- The effects of item saliency and question design on measurement error in a self-administered survey; 2012; Stern, M. J., Smyth, J. D., Mendez, J.
- The cross platform report. Q2 -2012 - US; 2012
- Sensitive topics in PC Web and mobile web surveys: Is there a difference?; 2012; Mavletova, A. M., Couper, M. P.
- Mobile email opens report 2nd half 2011; 2012
- Guide to social science data preparation. Best practice throughout the data life cycle; 2012
- Boosting Web pick-up Rates by referring to Compliance Principles ; 2012; Falnes-Dalheim, E., Haraldsen, G., Sundvoll, A.
- 2010 ACS Content Test Evaluation Report Covering Computer and Internet ; 2012; Shin, H. B.
- Use of Response Propensities; 2012; Bethlehem, J., Biffignandi, S.
- The Problem of Self-Selection; 2012; Bethlehem, J.,Biffignandi, S.
- E-Mail Surveys; 2012; Mesch, G.
- Using Mixed-Mode Contacts to Facilitate Participation in Public Agency Client Surveys; 2012; Israel, G. D.
- An Analysis of the AAPOR 2011 Membership Survey Nonresponse and Paradata; 2012; Hammer, H., Murphy, J., Hamel, L., Harrison, C.
- What is Probit; 2011
- User agent; 2011
- The smart(phone) way to collect survey data; 2011; Stapleton, C.
- The changing role of address-based sampling in survey research; 2011; Iannacchione, V. G.
- Mobile, webmail, desktops: Where are we viewing email now?; 2011
- A meta-analysis of experiments manipulating progress indicators in Web surveys; 2011; Callegaro, M., Villar, A., Yang, Y.
- Online Surveys: Past, Present, and Future; 2011; de Leeuw, E. D.
- Using e-mail recruitment and an online questionnaire to establish effect size: A worked example ; 2011; Kirkby, H. M., Calver, M., Draper, H., Calvert, M., Wilson, S.
- The use of email‐facilitated interviewing with higher functioning autistic people participating...; 2011; Benford, P., Standen, P.
- E-survey (surveys based on e-mail & web) Analysis and identification of cold responsive proteins in...; 2011; Sodabeh, J.-G., Ferdous, R.-J., Lello, Z., Ghasem, K., Ghasem, H. S., Gholipoori, A., Siroos, M., Sajjad...
- E-survey (surveys based on e-mail & web); 2011; Kalantari, D. H., Kalantari, D. E., Maleki, S.
- Response Rates and Data Quality in Web and Mail Surveys Administered to PhD Holders; 2011; Barrios, M., Villarroya, A., Borrego, A., Olle, C.
- The multidimensional integral business survey response model; 2010; Bavdaž, M.
- The impact of next and back buttons on time to complete and measurement reliability in computer-based...; 2010; Gershon, R. C. et al.
- Sources of measurement errors in business surveys; 2010; Bavdaž, M.
- Recruiting probability samples for a multi-mode research panel with Internet and mail components; 2010; Rao, K.
- Take these steps to build your research on a solid foundation ; 2010; Hardy, M.
- Randomized trial showed that an “embedded” survey strategy optimized authorization rates...; 2010; Murdoch, M., Pietila, D. M., Partin, M. R.
- Questionnaire Design of Self-Administered Paper and Online Surveys: Efficiency Considerations ; 2010; Lehtmets, D.
- Using Web Surveys To Determine Audience Characteristics And Product Preferences; 2010; Philbrick, J. H., Bart, B., F. F.Smith, R. F.
- Using the Internet to Survey Small Towns and Communities: Limitations and Possibilities in the Early...; 2010; Smyth, J. D., Dillman, D. A., Christian, L. M., O'Neill, A. C.
- Exploring mode effects in a panel survey of new businesses; 2009; Santos, B., DesRoches, D.
- The Effects of the Initial Mode of Contact on the Response Rate and Data Quality in an Internet-Based...; 2009; Wiseman, F.
- Having their say: email interviews for research data collection with people who have verbal communication...; 2009; Ison, N.
- The Impact of Personalized Prenotification on Response Rates to an Electronic Survey; 2009; Hart, A. M., Brennan, C. W., Sym, D., Larson, E.
- Online Versus Paper: Format Effects in Tourism Surveys; 2009; Dolnicar, S., Laesser, C., Matus, K.
- Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods ; 2009; Fleming, C. M., Bowden, M.
- Usability testing; 2008; Roe, D. J.
- The advisory panel on online public opinion survey quality - Final report June 4, 2008; 2008
- Email survey; 2008; Porter, S. R.
- Swedish National Data Service's Strategy for Sharing and Mediating Data; 2008; Carlhed, C., Alfredsson, I.
- Using Web Surveys to Reach Community College Students: An Analysis of Response Rates and Response Bias...; 2008; Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., Hagedorn, L. S., Lee, J. J.
- Asking the age question in mail and online surveys; 2008; Gendall, P., Healey, B.
