Web Survey Bibliography (6476)

Page:

• 1
...
• 18
• 19
• 20
...
• 130

• The Effect of a Mixed Mode Wave on Subsequent Attrition in a Panel Survey: Evidence from the Understanding...; 2011; Lynn, P.
• Seeing Through the Eyes of the Respondent: An Eye-tracking Study on Survey Question Comprehension; 2011; Lenzner, A., Kaczmirek, L., Galesic, M.
• Eye Tracking in testing questionnaires: What’s the added value?; 2011; Tries, S.
• Panel Recruitment via Facebook; 2011; Toepoel, V.
• Dropout rates during completion of an occupation search tree in web-surveys; 2011; Tijdens, K.
• Usability and burden measurement in online forms; 2011; Thomsen, P.
• Dynamic Data Editing in online data collection for the Vacant Positions Survey; 2011; Stax, H.-P.
• Utilizing Web Technology in Business Data Collection: Some Norwegian, Dutch and Danish Experiences; 2011; Snijkers, G., Haraldsen, G., Stax, H.-P.
• Web survey software; 2011; Slavec, A., Berzelak, N., Vehovar, V.
• Disentangling relative mode effects for the web survey mode in the Safety Monitor; 2011; Schouten, B., van de Brakel, J., Buelens, B., Klausch, L. T., van der Laan, J.
• Combining web surveys and XBRL ; 2011; Roos, M.
• Improving validity in web surveys with hard‐to‐reach targets: Online Respondent Driven Sampling...; 2011; Mavletova, A. M.
• Developing Electronic Questionnaires at Statistics Canada: Experiences and Challenges in a Changing...; 2011; Lawrence, D.
• Experiences with mixed mode mail & web-enquêtes in probability samples with known individuals; 2011; Kalgraff Skjak, K., Kolsrud, K.
• Towards a Holistic Questionnaire Develoment, Evaluation and Testing Tool; 2011; Haraldsen, G., Revold, M. K.
• Effects of internet data collection in business surveys – the case of the Dutch SBS; 2011; Giesen, D.
• Ignoring the compatibility of online questionnaires may bias the psychological composition of your sample...; 2011; Funke, F.
• Video enhanced web survey; 2011; Fuchs, M., Kunz, T., Gebhard, F.
• Keeping Up Appearances: Maintaining standards during strategic changes in electronic reporting; 2011; Farrell, E., Hewett, K.
• Respondent engagement: using usability testing; 2011; Dowling, Z.
• Yes, no, maybe. Effectiveness and Effects of Recruiting Strategies for Online Access Panels; 2011; Dale, T., Marksten, O. M. Walsoe, H.
• New data sources for statistics: Experiences at Statistics Netherlands; 2011; Daas, P., ten Bosch, O., de Blois, C., Hoekstra, R., Roos, M.
• Further research on the design of complex grids; 2011; Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R.Conrad, F. G., Zhang, C.
• Interactive carrots and sticks to improve data quality; 2011; Conrad, F. G., Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., Zhang, C.
• Scrolling or paging - it depends; 2011; Blanke, K.
• Mode of invitation for web surveys; 2011; Bandilla, W., Couper, M. P.
• Mobile Research Permissioning; 2011; Milla, P.
• The Battle For Business Data: New Technologies Critical To Researchers' Arsenal; 2011; Anderson, J.
• Research Applications for Mobile Data Collection; 2011; Fawson, B.
• Optimum Blending of Panels and Social Network Respondents; 2011; Gittelman, S. H., Portner, A.
• Making the move to mobile Apps-based research: A case study in the evaluation and implementation of...; 2011; Graham, P., Conry, S.
• Building Representative Datasets Using Multiple Online Respondent Sources: A New Method For A Difficult...; 2011; Eggers, M., Drake, E.
• Once a 'Bad' Respondent, Always a 'Bad' Respondent - How to Identify and Exclude '...; 2011; Suresh, N.
• Dealing with the Effects of Panelist Experience; 2011; Burdein, I.
• Results from Real-Time Data Collection (RTD) vs. Data from Traditional Panelists: Is it valid to combine...; 2011; Pingitore, G., Witten, S., Walker, A., Seldin, D., Ellrodt, R., Muns, N., Parks, C., Serrato, C.
• Widening the Net: A Comparison of Online Intercept and Access Panel Sampling; 2011; Bakken, D. G., Nawani, R.
• Does choice of vendor make a difference in respondent validation and how does it impact the overall...; 2011; Courtright, M., Miller, C.
• The Future of Research Through Gaming; 2011; Adamou, B.
• Making it fit: how survey technology providers are responding to the challenges of handling web surveys...; 2011; Macer, T.
• Probably the Best Bias in the World?; 2011; Dent, T.
• Optimus Modus: Comparing interviewing modes for visitor surveys; 2011; Stanley, N., Jenkins, S.
• The development of the KubeMatrix™ as a mobile app for Market Research Online Communities; 2011; Birks, D. F., Wilson, D.
• Online Research – Game On!: A look at how gaming techniques can transform your online research; 2011; Puleston, J.
• Engagement, Consistency, Reach – why the Technology Landscape Precludes All Three; 2011; Johnson, A., Rolfe, G.
• Proposed Indicators to Assess Interviewer Performance (IP) in CATI Surveys; 2011; Laflamme, F.
• The use of paradata to improve data collection at Statistics Canada: Empirical results and research; 2011; Gambino, J., Wrighte, D.
• Medium Node: NSF Census Research Network; 2011; McCutcheon, A. L., Belli, R. F., Olson, K., D.; Smyth, J. D., Soh, L.-K.
• A new online building survey system; 2011; Wang, Y.
• The Interactive Effects of Motivations and Trust in Anonymity on Adolescents' Enduring Participation...; 2011; Stiglbauer, B., Gnambs, T., Gamsjäger, M.
• The Research-Data-Centre in Research-Data-Centre Approach: A First Step Towards Decentralised International...; 2011; Bender, S., Heining, J.

Page:

• 1
...
• 18
• 19
• 20
...
• 130