Web Survey Bibliography (264)

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6

• The Effects of Errors in Paradata on Weighting Class Adjustments: A Simulation Study; 2013; West, B. T.
• Improving Surveys with Paradata: Analytic Uses of Process Information; 2013; Kreuter, F.
• Ten questions to ask your online survey provider; 2013; Williams, D.
• Practical tools for designing and weighting survey samples; 2013; Valliant, R. L., Daver, J. A., Kreuter, F.
• Measuring Wages Worldwide: Exploring the Potentials and Constraints of Volunteer Web Surveys; 2013; Steinmetz, S., Raess, D., Tijdens, K., de Pedraza, P.
• Moving an established survey online – or not?; 2013; Barber, T., Chilvers, D., Kaul, S.
• The comparison of road safety survey answers between web-panel and face-to-face; Dutch results of SARTRE...; 2013; Goldenbeld, C., de Craen, S.
• Measuring working conditions in a volunteer web survey; 2013; de Pedraza, P., Villacampa, A.
• Propensity Score Weighting – Can Personality Adjust for Selectivity?; 2013; Glantz, A., Greszki, R.
• The rise of the "connected viewer"; 2012; Smith, A., Boyles, J. L.
• Eurobarometer Special surveys: Special Eurobarometer 381; 2012
• Computation of Survey Weights: Bridging Theory and Practice; 2012; Debell, M.
• Modes of Data Collection; 2012; Tourangeau, R.
• An experimental investigation of the effects of noncontingent and contingent incentives in recruiting...; 2012; Lavrakas, P. J., Dennis, J. M., Peugh, J., Shand-Lubbers, J., Lee, E., Peugh, J., Charlebois, O., Murakami...
• Rules of engagement: The war against poorly engaged respondents - guidelines for elimination; 2012; Gittelman, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
• Web Panels; 2012; Bethlehem, J., Biffignandi, S.
• Use of Response Propensities; 2012; Bethlehem, J., Biffignandi, S.
• Weighting Adjustment Techniques; 2012; Bethlehem, J., Biffignandi, S.
• The Problem of Self-Selection; 2012; Bethlehem, J.,Biffignandi, S.
• The Problem of Undercoverage; 2012; Bethlehem, J., Biffignandi, S.
• Respondent-driven sampling; 2012; Schonlau, M., Liebau, E.
• A Structural Analysis Based on Similarity between Fuzzy Clusters and Its Application to Evaluation Data...; 2012; Chiba, R., Furutani, T., Sato-Ilic, M.
• Why one should incorporate the design weights when adjusting for unit nonresponse using response homogeneity...; 2012; Kott, P. S.
• Cell Sample Demographics under Alternative Dual-Frame Sample Designs; 2012; Montgomery, R., Morrison, H., Zeng, W., Wolter, K., Blumberg, S. J., O'Connor, K.
• Data Quality from Low Cost Data Collection Methodologies; 2012; Traugott, M. W.
• To Weight, or Not to Weight, That is the Question: Survey Weights and Multivariate Analysis; 2012; Young, R., Johnson, D. R.
• Multiple Imputation for Unit Nonresponse and Measurement Error; 2012; Peytchev, A.
• Assessing the Quality of Survey Data ; 2012; Blasius, J.
• Collecting, Managing, and Assessing Data Using Sample Surveys; 2012; Stopher, P.
• Online survey research: Findings, best practices, and future research. Report prepared for the Advertising...; 2011; Vannette, D.
• Online survey research: Findings, Best practices, and future research; 2011
• Just published: Forrester Wave™ of enterprise feedback management satisfaction and loyalty solutions...; 2011; McInnes, A.
• In search of a new approach to measure newspaper audiences in Canada: The journey continues; 2011; Crassweller, A., Rogers, J., Graves, F., Gauthier, E., Charlebois, O.
• Households with Computers, Telephone Subscriptions, and Internet Access, Selected Years, 1997 - 2010; 2011
• Eurobarometer Special surveys: EB75.1 E-Communications Household Survey. Special Eurobarometer 362; 2011
• A meta-analysis of experiments manipulating progress indicators in Web surveys; 2011; Callegaro, M., Villar, A., Yang, Y.
• The Evolution of Edits in the Canadian Census of Population Online Questionnaires; 2011; Laroche, D.
• Current Projects at University of Ljubljana; 2011; Lozar Manfreda, K.
• Maintaining Cross-Sectional Representativeness in a Longitudinal General Population Survey ; 2011; Lynn, P.
• The German Access Panel and the Impact of Response Propensities; 2011; Amarov, B., Enderle, T., Muennich, R., Rendtel, U., Zins, S.
• A Bayesian analysis of small area probabilities under a constraint; 2011; Nandram, B., Sayit, H.
• The Impact of Non-Response Treatments on the Stability of Blockmodels; 2011; Znidarsic, A., Ferligoj, A., Doreian, P.
• test; 2011; Aadland, D.; Øverlien, C.; Abbott, R. D.; Abels, E. G.
• Research on Internet survey errors and control methods; 2011; Mingyue, F., Xicang, Z.
• Separation of selection bias and mode effect in mixed-mode survey – Application to the face-to...; 2011; Bayart, C., Bonnel, P.
• Social Climate Survey of Tobacco Control: A mixed-mode approach; 2011; Klein, J. D., McMillen, R.
• Exploring use of information in paradata through calibration method to detect and adjust non-response...; 2011; Billiet, J. Matsuo, H.
• Assessment of propensity score methods on nonresponse bias adjustment; 2011; Alanya, A., Billiet, J., Matsuo, H.
• Nonsampling errors in dual frame telephone surveys ; 2011; Brick, J. M., Flores Cervantes, I., Lee, S., Norman, G.
• Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys ; 2011; Bethlehem, J., Cobben, F., Schouten, B.

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6