Web Survey Bibliography - Internet access Panels (460)

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10

• Quality of a probability-based online panel for the social sciences in Germany: first results.; 2011; Bandilla, W., Kaczmirek, L., Schaurer, I., Struminskaya, B.
• Answer behavior in a probability based internet panel; 2011; Vis, C., Wijnant, A.
• Can Tailor-made Questions Motivate Respondents in an Internet Panel?; 2011; Oudejans, M.
• Why do Internet panel members become inactive and how can they be re-activated?; 2011; Scherpenzeel, A.
• Noncoverage and Nonresponse in a Probability Based Mixed-Mode Access Panel; 2011; Bartsch, S., Engel, U., Vehre, H.,
• Surveying the General Population: Coverage bias in European Web Surveys; 2011; de Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J., Mohorko, A.
• Examination of Panel Conditioning Effects in a Web-Based 2007-2008 Election Study.; 2011; Dennis, J. M., Kruse, Y., Tompson, T.
• Response Quantity, Response Quality, and Costs of Building an Online Panel via Social Contacts.; 2011; Toepoel, V.
• The Use of Web Panels to Characterize Rare Conditions.; 2011; Boyle, J.
• Same Family, Different Planet: Comparing the Views of Teens and Parents on Their Relationship and Potential...; 2011; Vaughan, R., Feinstein, E. C., Peugh, J., Shand-Lubbers, J.
• Category Selection Probing in Online Access Panels.; 2011; Behr, D., Kaczmirek, L., Braun, M., Bandilla, W.
• Results of a Survey Experiment on Frequency Reporting: Religious Service Attendance from the 2010 ANES...; 2011; Debell, M., Figueroa, L.
• Are you who you say you are? Using a Multisource Cross-validation Methodology for Panel Membership Information...; 2011; Rao, K., Dolson, T., Kinnucan, M.
• Differential Sampling Based on Historical Individual-Level Data in Online Panels.; 2011; Kelly, R. H.
• How Can We Believe What They Say? The Role of Missing and Validating Data in Panelists; 2011; Rao, K.
• Re-Examining the Validity of Different Survey Modes for Measuring Public Opinion in the U.S.: Findings...; 2011; Ansolabehere, S.; Fraga, B.; Schaffner, B. F.
• Does question order influence sensitivity to scope? Empirical findings from a web-based contingent valuation...; 2011; Nielsen, J. S., Kjaer, T.
• Formative Research on MySpace: Online Methods to Engage Hard-to-Reach Populations ; 2011; Levine, D., Madsen, A., Wright, E., Barar, R. E., Santelli, J., Bull, S.
• Estimating Propensity Adjustments for Volunteer Web Surveys; 2011; Valliant, R. L., Dever, J. A.
• Use these five Web-based approaches to shrink your research timelines, costs ; 2011; Cutler, A. D.
• Online qualitative approaches: an appraisal; 2011; Parker, K.
• The impact of next and back buttons on time to complete and measurement reliability in computer-based...; 2010; Gershon, R. C. et al.
• Research synthesis. AAPOR report on online panels; 2010; Brick, J. M. et al.
• Recruiting probability samples for a multi-mode research panel with Internet and mail components; 2010; Rao, K.
• Real ID. State of The Art Representative and Repeatable Online Samples. Behaviorally Profiled Respondents...; 2010; Gittelman, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
• Overview of data collection methodology; 2010
• Machines that lean how to code open ended survey data; 2010; Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.
• Ekos' observation of MRIA study - Canadian online panels: similar or different?; 2010
• The Future of Internet Research; 2010; Lavrakas, P. J.
• Why are we trying to create new communities for market research purposes?; 2010; Pearson, C., Kateley, V.
• Online panel survey, Change and stability of political attitudes; 2010
• The Internet, Electoral Politics and Citizen Participation in Global Perspective; 2010; Gibson, R., Cantijoch, M.
• Challenges in Reaching Hard-to-Reach Groups in Internet Panel Research; 2010; Marchand, M., Vis, C.
• How Representative Are Online Panels? Problems of Coverage and Selection and Possible Solutions; 2010; Bethlehem, J., Scherpenzeel, A.
• True Longitudinal and Probability-Based Internet Panels: Evidence from the Netherlands; 2010; Das, M., Scherpenzeel, A.
• Continuity and Innovation in the Design of Understanding Society: the UK Household Longitudinal Study...; 2010; Laurie, H.
• Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 2: Results from Methodological Experiments ; 2010; Burton, J., Laurie, H., Uhrig, S.C. N.
• Update on the ARF’s Quality Enhancement Process (QeP); 2010; Pettit, R.
• From clipboards to online research communities; 2010; Poynter, R., Cierpicki, S., Lorch, J., Zuo, B., Davis, C., Eddy, C.
• Digital, Social Moms: Using Social Media to Increase Respondent Engagement and Decrease Recruiting Costs...; 2010; Stemberg, C., Rimmer, L., Weinstein, D.
• How is Emerging Technology/Web 2.0 Changing Gathering Consumer Feedback and the Delivery of Data? ; 2010; Price, K., Patel, N.
• Factorial Design on Survey Router Configuration Effect by Sample Source; 2010; Fawson, B., Johnson, E. P.
• Participant Satisfaction and Panel Member Retention; 2010; Portner, A.
• Conditioning Effects in Online Communities; 2010; Cape, P. J.
• Looking Beyond Quality Differences: How Do Consumer Buying Patterns Differ by Sample Source?; 2010; Baker-Prewitt, J.
• Recruiting Online Panel Members from a Mail survey in the General Population: Results from an Exploratory...; 2010; Reuband, K.H.
• An Examination of Panel Conditioning in an Advertising Tracking Study with Cross-Sectional Design; 2010; Anderson, A. J., Marsh, K. A., Turner, S., Marsh, S. M.
• Representing Seniors in an Online National Probability Panel Survey: Measuring Technology Attitudes...; 2010; Peugh, J., Mansfield, W., Wells, T., Semans, K.
• Communicating Disclosure Risk in Informed Consent Statements; 2010; Singer, E., Couper, M. P.
• Assessing the Accuracy of the Face-to-Face Recruited Internet Survey Platform: A Comparison of Behavioral...; 2010; Villar, A., Malka, A., Krosnick, J. A.

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10