Web Survey Bibliography - Standards, codes (430)

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9

• Improving Surveys with Paradata: Analytic Uses of Process Information; 2013; Kreuter, F.
• Addressing Disclosure Concerns and Analysis Demands in a Real-Time Online Analytic System; 2013; Krenzke, T., Gentleman, J. F., Li, J., Moriarity, C.
• Consolidation and Standardization of Survey Operations at a Decentralized Federal Statistical Agency; 2013; Nealon, J., Gleaton, E.
• Ethics, privacy and data security in web-based course evaluation; 2013; Salaschek, M., Meese, C., Thielsch, M.
• Beyond methodology - some ethical implications of "doing research online"; 2013; Heise, N.
• Improving Survey Website Usability ; 2012; Vannette, D.
• Transparency, Access and the Credibility of Survey Research; 2012; Lupia, A.
• Anonymity and Confidentiality; 2012; Tourangeau, R.
• Cognitive Evaluation of Survey Instruments: State of the Science (Art?) and Future Directions; 2012; Willis, G. B.
• What Human Language Technology can do for you (and vice versa); 2012; Liberman, M.
• How to provide high data quality in online-questionnaires: Setting guidelines in design; 2012; Tries, S., Nebel, S., Blanke, K.
• Comparability of Survey Measurements; 2012; Oberski, D.
• Classification of Surveys; 2012; Stoop, I., Harrison, E.
• Enhancing Web Surveys With New HTML5 Input Types; 2012; Funke, F.
• Why one should incorporate the design weights when adjusting for unit nonresponse using response homogeneity...; 2012; Kott, P. S.
• Do You Know Who Your Respondents Are? Measuring Data Hygiene Using Respondent Validation; 2012; Frede, S., Suresh, N.
• Sponsored White Paper: 11 Easy Ways to Improve Your Survey Response Rates ; 2012
• Flash Programming for the Social & Behavioral Sciences: A Simple Guide to Sophisticated Online Surveys...; 2012; Weinstein, Y.
• Assessing the Quality of Survey Data ; 2012; Blasius, J.
• Designing and Doing Survey Research; 2012; Andres, L.
• Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences; 2012; Gideon, L.
• Code of standards and ethics for survey research; 2011
• A classification of question characteristics relevant to measurement (error) and consequently important...; 2011; Campanelli, P., Nicolaas, G., Jaeckle, A., Lynn, P., Hope, S., Blake, M., Gray, M.
• Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys 2011; 2011
• Effects of internet data collection in business surveys – the case of the Dutch SBS; 2011; Giesen, D.
• Ignoring the compatibility of online questionnaires may bias the psychological composition of your sample...; 2011; Funke, F.
• Keeping Up Appearances: Maintaining standards during strategic changes in electronic reporting; 2011; Farrell, E., Hewett, K.
• Engagement, Consistency, Reach – why the Technology Landscape Precludes All Three; 2011; Johnson, A., Rolfe, G.
• The Research-Data-Centre in Research-Data-Centre Approach: A First Step Towards Decentralised International...; 2011; Bender, S., Heining, J.
• The Impact of Non-Response Treatments on the Stability of Blockmodels; 2011; Znidarsic, A., Ferligoj, A., Doreian, P.
• Preface; 2011; Coenders, G., Doreian, P.
• Nonparametric Tests of Panel Conditioning and Attrition Bias in Panel Surveys; 2011; Das, M., Toepoel, V., van Soest, A.
• A Psycholinguistic Look at Survey Question Design and Response Quality; 2011; Lenzner, T.
• Introduction to Usability Testing for Survey Research; 2011; Geisen, E., Jarrett, C.
• Twice random, once mixed: Applying mixed models to simultaneously analyze random effects of language...; 2011; Janssen, D. P.
• Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Response; 2011; Schouten, B., Shlomo, N., Skinner, C.
• Data Collection: Sample Members Responses, Influences, and Perception of Data Security.; 2011; Jeannis, M., Terry, T. L., Thomas-Banks, D.
• Examination of Panel Conditioning Effects in a Web-Based 2007-2008 Election Study.; 2011; Dennis, J. M., Kruse, Y., Tompson, T.
• Mode Differences in a Mixed-Mode ABS Design.; 2011; Bautista, R., Datta, R., Scholfield Hepburn, P., Yan, T.
• Cleaving the Past Behind: A Comparison of Response Formats in the Measurement of Ethnic and Racial Origins...; 2011; Barlas, F. M., Thomas, R. K., Higgins, W. B.
• Visual Design and Usability of Filter and Follow-up Questions in a Web Survey.; 2011; Ramirez, C. M.
• Features of the Z-scoring method in graphical two-dimensional web surveys: the case of ZEF; 2011; Selkälä, A., Ronkainen, S., Alasaarela, E.
• Guidelines for easing parental fears regarding online research; 2011; Goldfarb Liss, P.
• Ethical Considerations in Internet Surveys; 2010; Singer, E., Couper, M. P.
• Weighting Strategy for Understanding Society; 2010; Lynn, P., Kaminska, O.
• Update on the ARF’s Quality Enhancement Process (QeP); 2010; Pettit, R.
• Codebook and explanatory note on the WageIndicator dataset ; 2010; Tijdens, K., van Zijl, S., Hughie-Williams, M., van Klaveren, M., Steinmetz, S.
• Modeling non-sampling errors and participation in Web surveys; 2010; Biffignandi, S.
• Perspectives on Web Survey Development: Views from Programmers, Content Specialists, and Survey Methodologists...; 2010; Downey, K.
• Archiving and Re-using Qualitative and Qualitative Longitudinal Data in Slovenia; 2010; Stebe, J., Hudales, J., Kragelj, B.

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9