Web Survey Bibliography - Other (450)

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9

• Web Survey Say....; 2002; Anonymous
• BCE & AXA Overcome Access and Confidentiality Hurdles to Web Surveys; 2002; Anonymous
• Web based methodologies and techniques to monitor electronic resources use in university libraries; 2002; Civardi, M., Maffenini, W., Zavarrone, E.
• Employing a mixed-mode qualitative research method prior to conducting quantitative research; 2002; Metzler, D. P., Davis, P. C.
• Design of Web Survey Questionnaires: Three Basic Experiments; 2002; Lozar Manfreda, K., Batagelj, Z., Vehovar, V.
• Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality; 2002; Aladwani, A. M., Palvia, P. C.
• Methods for Improving Compliance in Exposure Studies; 2002; Dimitropoulos, L., Thalji, L., Weibe, L.
• Web Surveys: The Effect of Controlling Survey Access using PIN Numbers; 2002; Heerwegh, D., Loosveldt, G.
• Context Effects in Web-Surveys; 2002; Reips, U. -D.
• Measuring web-based service quality; 2002; Li, Y. N., Tan, K. C., Xie, M.
• The market for electronic newspapers in the Arab world; 2002; AlShehri, F., Gunter, B.
• Collective action in the age of the Internet: Mass communication and online mobilization; 2002; Brunsting, S., Postmes, T.
• Perceptual differences of marketing journals: A worldwide perspective; 2002; Theoharakis, V., Hirst, A.
• Research note: Online journalism in the low countries - Basic, occupational and professional characteristics...; 2002; Deuze, M., Paulussen, S.
• The Use of Web-Based Surveys for Academic Research in the Field of Engineering; 2002; Roztocki, N., Morgan, S. D.
• Knowledge acquisition, navigation and eye movements from text and hypertext; 2001; Naumann, A., Waniek, J., Krems, J. F.
• A Comparison of Web-based and Paper-and-Pencil Library Satisfaction Survey Results; 2001; Perkins, G. H., Yuan, H.
• On-line student feedback: A pilot study ; 2001; Galbraith, L. B., Gee, P., Jennings, F., Riley, R.
• Online Data Collection With Special Populations Over the World Wide Web; 2001; Marcell, M. M., Falls, A. L.
• Reliability And Comparability Of Choice-Based Measures: Online and Paper-and-Pencil Methods of Administration...; 2001; Miller, T. W., Rake, D., Sumimoto, T., Hollman, P. S.
• Response Rates in Internet Surveys – Experiences from an Online Expert Survey into WAP for business...; 2001; Marcussen, C. H.
• Investigating Validity in Web Surveys; 2001; Satmetrix Systems
• Examining Web vs. Paper Mode Effects In a Federal Government Customer Satisfaction Study; 2001; Burr, M. A., Levin, K., Becher, A.
• Web survey design and administration; 2001; Couper, M. P., Traugott, M. W., Lamias, M. J.
• Internet Surveys: Timeliness of Data Collection and Individual Survey Period Length; 2001; Biffignandi, S., Pratesi, M.
• The potential and use of electronic mail technology for conducting surveys in South Africa: a case study...; 2001; Armour, R. J., Viljoen, M. F., Nell, W. T.
• Statistical significance, effect size, and replication: What do the journals say?; 2001; de Vaney, T. A.
• Recent Developments in Electronic Data Collection at the U.S. Census Bureau; 2001; Sedivi Gaul, B.
• Advantages of Conducting Employee Research on the Internet: A Case Study; 2000; Sparre, M., Steen, J.
• Academic articles on the Web: Reading patterns and formats; 2000; Rho, Y. J., Gedeon, T. D.
• Combining information from a web based survey and a telephone survey; 1999; Tjostheim, I., Solheim, I., Aldrin, M.
• Getting the most out of Web-based surveys; 1999; Ward, D.
• Drop-out caused by JavaScript: "I could not have expected this to happen " - A Web experiment on the...; 1999; Reips, U. -D., Schwarz, S.
• Superfund: Half the Sites Have All Cleanup Remedies in Place or Completed; 1999; GAO
• Tutorial: PERL, a psychologically efficient reformatting language; 1998; Schwartz, A.
• Using the Internet for natural resource research: results from an online user survey; 1998; Leung, Y. F.
• Web survey reveals tepid year 2000 plans; 1998; Anonymous
• CATI, CAPI and Web Interviews. Technology Convergence or Divergence?; 1998; MacKay, I.
• Program for surveillance of causes of death of dogs, using the Internet to survey small animal veterinarians...; 1998; Gobar, G. M., Case, J. T., Kass, P. H.
• Non Probability Sampling for WWW Surveys: A Comparison of Methods; 1998; Schillewaert, N., Langerak, F., Duhamel, T.
• Economic Data Collection Via the Web: A Census Bureau Case Study; 1998; Nichols, E. M., Sedivi, B.
• Web-based Survey Tools; 1998; Nusser, S. M., Thompson, D.
• Will Interviewers Become Redundent?; 1997; Gerrard, L.
• Web Surveys - The Professional Way; 1997; Kottler, R. E.
• Does $10 Equal $10? The Effect of Framing on the Impact of Incentives; 1997; Singer, E., Gebler, N., van Hoewyk, J., Brown, J.
• Conjoint Analysis of Public Preferences for Farmland Protection: An Interactive World Wide Web Survey...; 1996; Mackenzie, J. E., Mackenzie, E. O.
• The Prodigy Experiment in Using e-Mail for Tracking Public Opinion; 1995; Werner, J., Maisel, R., Robinson, K.
• Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis of Selected Techniques for Inducing Response; 1988; Fox, R., Crask, M. R., Kim, J.Kim, H. G.
• Response Effects in the Electronic Survey; 1986; Kiesler, S., Sproull, L. S.
• Generalizing Mail SurveyInducement Methods: Population Interactionswith Anonymity and Sponsorship; 1979; Jones, W. H.

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9