Web Survey Bibliography
Back in the day, quantitative market research meant cross-tab decks with 20-point banners. Problem is, people are no longer back in the day. Back in the day, corporate main frames didn't have the computing power of today's smallest laptops. Marketing scientists and other brainiacs have had the last 30 years to develop new analytic techniques to take advantage of all this computing power. These new and not-so-new-anymore methodologies are designed to eliminate many of the biases and inaccuracies of traditional surveys. Modern marketing science offers marketers the chance to see a little more clearly, dig a little deeper, forecast a little more accurately. In some cases, it's not a little. Even without fully understanding the analytic plan, following these simple guidelines will vastly improve the quality of your data and subsequent analysis: 1. Avoid missing values by eliminating skip patterns and don't knows. 2. Prevent collinearity by mixing things up: item order, polarity. 3. Derive importances; don't ask directly.
ProQuest Homepage (abstract) / (Macro Consulting Homepage (full text)
Web Survey Bibliography - Marketing Research (34)
- Firefly Online Surveys: A fully featured tool for Web surveys and forums; 2012; Deal, K.
- Apples and oranges: does a web survey produce similar results to social media tracking?; 2011; Bourque, C., Hobbs, R., Hilaire, D. S.
- The Perils of Online Surveys; 2011; McCullough, P. R.
- Bring Your Survey Design Out of the Dark Ages; 2010; McCullough, P. R.
- Growing Pains; 2010; Trimarchi, E., Gittelmam, S. H.
- Be mindful of cellphone interviews; 2009; Anonymous
- What's Really Important?; 2008; Grapentine, T., Teas, K. R.
- Top concerns for our industry; 2008; Grapentine, T.
- The Consumer Panel Reinvented; 2007; Fielding, M.
- Data Preservation; 2007; Wyner, G. A.
- Surveying Landscape; 2005; Deal, K.
- Actions speak louder than surveys; 2004; Grapentine, T.
- Do-It-Yourself Internet Surveys; 2003; Deal, K.
- Cybersurveys come of age; 2003; Ray, N. M., Tabor, S. W.
- Get your conjoint online, in several flavors; 2002; Deal, K.
- Think before you dial; 2002; Gillin, D. L.
- Calling all customers; 2002; Long, J., Whinston, A. B., Tomak, K.
- Can we trust the data of online research?; 2001; Miller, T. W.
- Split-questionnaire designs: A new tool in survey design and panel management; 2001; Vriens, M., Wedel, M., Sandor, Z.
- What's ahead on the Internet; 2001; Grossnickle, C., Raskin, O.
- Are Internet Panels Creating Professional Respondents? A Study of Panel Effects.; 2001; Dennis, J. M.
- Using Internet polling to forecast the 2000 elections; 2001; Terhanian, G., Taylor, H., Bremer, J., Overmeyer, C., Siegel, J.W.
- Life (on the Internet) imitates research; 2000; Wyner, G. A.
- Banner-advertised Web surveys; 2000; Tuten, T. L., Bosnjak, M., Bandilla, W.
- E-mail and snail mail face off in rematch; 2000; Elfrink, J., Vazzana, G., Bachmann, D. P.
- Pro abd Con; 1999; Kulp, D., Hunter, R.
- Pro and con: Internet interviewing; 1999; Anonymous
- Cyber Research: The Impact of the Internet on Data Collection; 1998; Weible, R., Wallace, J.
- FAQs on Online research; 1998; Bowers, D. K.
- The new research tool; 1998; Bowers, D. K.
- Net? Not yet; 1996; Gjestland, L.
- Tracking the Progress of E-mail Versus Snail-Mail; 1996; Bachmann, D. P., Elfrink, J., Vazzana, G.
- E-Mail Surveys: Potentials and Pitfalls; 1995; Oppermann, M.
- Electronic Mail Versus Mail Survey Response Rates; 1994; Schuldt, B. A., Totten, J. W.