Web Survey Bibliography (6338)

Page:

• 1
...
• 18
• 19
• 20
...
• 127

• Development and Validation of a Web-Based Questionnaire for Surveying Skydivers; 2011; Nilsson, J.; Friden, C.; Buren, V.; Ang, B.
• Method of administration affects adolescent post-immunization survey response rate: phone, paper, internet...; 2011; Pielak, K. L.; Buxton, J.; McIntyrea, C.; Tu, A,; Botnick, M. R.
• Introduction to Usability Testing for Survey Research; 2011; Geisen, E., Jarrett, C.
• Utilizing Web Technology in Business Data Collection: Some Norwegian, Dutch and Danish Experiences; 2011; Haraldsen, G., Snijkers, G., Roos, M., Sundvoll, A., Vik, T., Stax, H.-P.
• E-Census 2011 Portugal: implementation and results of the Pilot Survey; 2011; Vicente, P., Rosa, A., Reis, E.
• Facebook sampling methods: some methodological proposals; 2011; Macrì, E., Tessitore, C.
• Reflections on web based data collection in a mixed mode design: the case of the EU Labour Force Survey...; 2011; Kloek, W., van der Valk, J.
• Standardising the web data collection channel at the Basque Statistics Office (EUSTAT); 2011; Prado, C., Guinea , C.
• An Experimental Investigation of Mode Effects in the Hungarian Census Test 2009; 2011; Vereczkei, Z.
• Collaborative systems for enhancing the analysis of social surveys: the Grid Enabled Specialist Data...; 2011; Lambert, P., Warner, G., Doherty, T., McCafferty, S., Watt, J., Comerford, M., Gayle, V., Tan, L.,...
• ILS Online Survey; 2011; Weber, C.
• Testing for measurement equivalence of human values across online and paper-and-pencil surveys; 2011; Davidov, E., Depner, F.
• Development of a Web-Based Survey for Monitoring Daily Health and its Application in an Epidemiological...; 2011; Sugiura, H., Ohkusa, Y., Akahane, M., Sano, T., Okabe, N., Imamura, T.
• Sampling v. Scale: An investigation the tension between convenience sampling, response rates, probability...; 2011; Garland, P.
• Effectiveness and consequences of various recruitment methods in psychological research: case study; 2011; Póltorak, M.
• Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk for the recruitment of participants in Internet-based research; 2011; Reips, U. -D., Buffardi, L., Kuhlmann, T.
• A new approach to the analysis of survey drop-out. Results from Follow-up Surveys in the German Longitudinal...; 2011; Rossmann, J., Blumenstiel, J. E., Steinbrecher, M.
• Tracking the decision-making process – Findings from an Online Rolling Cross-Section Panel Study...; 2011; Faas, T.
• Social desirability and self-reported health risk behaviors in web-based research: three longitudinal...; 2011; Crutzen, R., Goeritz, A.
• Slider Scales Causing Serious Problems With Less Educated Respondents; 2011; Funke, F., Reips, U. -D., Thomas, R. K.
• Should we use the progress bar in online surveys? A meta-analysis of experiments manipulating progress...; 2011; Callegaro, M., Yang, Y., Villar, A.
• From "Web Questions" to "Propensity Score Weighting": An Evaluation of Topics and...; 2011; Welker, M., Taddicken, M.
• Survey Says? A Primer on Web-Based Survey Design and Distribution; 2011; Oppenheimer, A. J., Pannucci, C. J., Kasten, S. J., Haase, S. C.
• Quota Controls: Science or merely Sciencey?; 2011; Cape, P. J.
• Rich Profiles – Or: What's the problem with self-disclosure data?; 2011; Tress, F.
• Who are leaving our panel: panel attrition and personality traits; 2011; Marchand, M.
• Mobile Research Apps – Adding New Capabilities to Market Research; 2011; Rieber, D.
• The influence of personality traits and motives for joining on participation behavior in online panels...; 2011; Keusch, F.
• Asking sensitive questions in a recruitment interview for an online panel: the income question; 2011; Schaurer, I., Struminskaya, B., Kaczmirek, L., Bandilla, W.
• Determinants of access-panel participation: Recent experiences from the recruitment of members for a...; 2011; Engel, U., Bartsch, S., Vehre, H.
• Speeders in Online Value Research: Cross-checking results of fast and slow respondents in two separate...; 2011; Beckers, T., Siegers, P., Kuntz, A.
• Effects of survey question clarity on data quality; 2011; Lenzner, T.
• Respondent Characteristics as Explanations for Uninformative Survey Response: Sources of Nondifferentiation...; 2011; Van Meurs, L., Klausch, L. T., Schoenbach, K.
• Recreation Participation and Conservation Attitudes: Differences Between Mail and Online Respondents...; 2011; Graefe, A., Mowen, A. J., Covelli, E.
• Improving online surveys; 2011; Puleston, J.
• Snap judgement polling; 2011; Anderson, K., Wright, M., Wheeler, M.
• Individual differences in motivation to participate in online panels; 2011; Bruggen, E., Wetzels, M., de Ruyter, K., Schillewaert, N.
• Data Use: A systematic method for checking online questionnaires; 2011; Arbittier, J.
• In the market for an online panel? What clients need to know; 2011; Hartmann, S.
• How Procter & Gamble worked to develop online data quality guidelines; 2011; Gloeckler, D.
• Understanding the pros and cons of mixed-mode research; 2011; Mora, M.
• Visiting item non-responses in internet survey data collection; 2011; Albaum, G., Roster, C. A., Smith, S. M., Wiley, J. B.
• Estimating nonresponse bias and mode effects in a mixed-mode survey; 2011; Lugtig, P. J., Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J., Frerichs, R., Greven, A.
• Can search engine advertising help access rare samples?; 2011; Nunan, D., Knox, S.
• Why Web-assisted TDIs are a cost-effective qualitative methodology ; 2011; Donnelly, T.
• Capturing affective experiences using the SMS Experience Sampling (SMS-ES) method.; 2011; Andrews, L., Russell-Bennett, R., Drennan, J.
• Successful Prompting Methods on a Web-Based Survey; 2011; Venkataraman, L.
• Multi-Mode Survey Administration; 2011; Holder, T.
• Do’s and Don’ts of Developing Mixed Mode Surveys; 2011; Sanders, T.
• Mobile Survey Development Toolkit/Survey Framework; 2011; Rauch, M.

Page:

• 1
...
• 18
• 19
• 20
...
• 127