Web Survey Bibliography
(a) Relevance & Research Question:
A research grant by the Austrian Ministry for Science and Research enables a research group from the Johannes Kepler University of Linz to design, implement, and evaluate a “secondary student online panel” (“SchülerInnenOnlinePanel”; see Altrichter et al., 2008) together with secondary school students. After the implementation process the online panel will be provided for youth research by students as well as researchers (www.opinioncorner.at).
(b) Methods & Data:
Design and implementation of the panel are evaluated with both quantitative and qualitative methods such as log file analyses, online-surveys, qualitative interviews, (video-) observations, and a reflective research diary.
(c) Results:
Firstly, the proposed paper points out the pros and cons of developing (design of website, marketing and recruiting of young people) a youth online panel in contrast to common adult panels. Specialty of the current development process is the collaborative partnership between social scientists, students from upper secondary schools, and their teachers.
Secondly, the paper outlines some preliminary results of the evaluation of the project regarding panel quality - panel size, sociodemographics of the users, survey response rates, page views, and results of a usability study.
Finally, the paper discusses challenges emerging when implementing an online panel for youth research such as recruitment of young people.
(d) Added Value:
An important focus of analyses will be on gender aspects which, as we hypothesize from former experiences with new technologies (see Paseka 2008), might be a relevant aspect in students’ application of the online panel.
Conference Homepage (abstract)
Web survey bibliography - General Online Research Conference (GOR) 2010 (17)
- Testing the Applicability of Respondent Driven Sampling as an Online Research Method to Sample Hidden...; 2010; Pajak, D.
- Seriousness Checks are Useful to Improve Data Validity in Online Research; 2010; Diedenhofen, D., Aust, F., Ullrich, S., Musch, J.
- Enrichment of Qualitative Research through Online Approaches: New Insights due to Online CoCreation...; 2010; Krischke-Ramaswamy, M., Knorr, H.
- Developing and Evaluating a Student Online Panel.; 2010; Stiglbauer, B., Gamsjäger, M., Gnambs, T., Batinic, B., Altrichter, H.
- Online Access Panels: A detailed look at different Ways of Entering, their Costs and Participation Behavior...; 2010; Führer, R., Keusch, F.
- Eye Tracking and Cognitive Interviewing: Steps to improve online questionnaires; 2010; Tries, S., Sattelberger, S.
- Trial by Ordeal, a medieval approach to a modern day problem; 2010; Cape, P., Cavallaro, K.
- How new engagement techniques and question approaches are revolutionizing online research data gathering...; 2010; Puleston, J.
- Social Networking Sites: New approaches for Online-Panels?; 2010; Drosdow, M., Geißler, H.
- The Impact of Visual and Functional Design Elements in Online Survey Research; 2010; Hammen, K.
- Theoretical model of context-sensitive mobile methods; 2010; Maxl, E.
- Can a professional questionnaire layout make up for a boring topic? The mediating role of topic interest...; 2010; Keusch, F., Mayerhofer, W., Jungreithmaier, S., Weilbuchner, N., Fuehrer, R., Kling, H.
- Using Propensity Score Weighting to Reduce Bias of a Swiss Market Research Web Panel; 2010; Wiegand, G., Jella, H., Beat, H., Stefan, L.
- Potentials and Constraints of Propensity Score Weighting to Improve Web Survey Quality; 2010; Steinmetz, S., Tijdens, K.
- Selection Bias in Web Surveys and the Use of Propensity Scores in Forecasting the Result of the 2009...; 2010; Musch, J., Ullrich, S., Diedenhofen, D.
- Breakoff in Web Surveys of the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES); 2010; Blumenstiel, J. E., Roßmann, J., Steinbrecher, M.
- The longitudinal effect of incentives on participation and data quality in online panels; 2010; Neumann, B. P., Goeritz, A.