Web Survey Bibliography
An ongoing concern over survey quality with focus on online sampling and survey design demands a broad analysis of all components of the process. To identify what matters and to what degree it impacts survey data quality, it is necessary to take all the individual components of this broad perspective and break them down into specific parts taking special care to look within each area for potential quality drivers.
We know online sample can be managed improperly and lead to biased results. We know survey design can be done improperly and skew responses. We know the interview length with online surveys can lead to satisficing or incomplete response, higher drop-out rates, and less satisfaction with the online survey respondent experience. We know there are many components to providing quality and we strive to do 51 what we can as an industry to effectively determine adequate procedural guidelines as we forge ahead with online survey research. For the purpose of this research presentation proposal we have chosen to present findings related to respondent engagement with particular attention paid to the role of grids in the research design and its impact on quality.
Our research findings are from a large internal R&D project conducted with our proprietary online research panel, Viewpoint Forum. In this research we conduct a multi-cell test to identify alternate ways of presenting attributes and the effect of the alternatives on data quality and respondent engagement. Key findings suggest a specific approach to survey design to maximize both data quality and engagement.
This presentation is focused specifically on this grid research and we hope to contribute to the larger body of knowledge that exists for how to effectively design a research study for an online modality.
Conference Homepage (abstract)
Web Survey Bibliography - Internet access Panels (467)
- Beyond data stability: Rising above quality concerns; 2011
- Background - QSOAP; 2011
- Amazon's Mechanical Turk. A new source of inexpensive, yet high quality, data?; 2011; Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., Gosling, S. D.
- The optimal number of response options in internet panel surveys; 2011; Thorsdottir, F.
- Online Research @ GESIS; 2011; Kaczmirek, L., Lenzner, T.
- E-dater, Artificial Actors, and German Households; 2011; Hebing, M.
- Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 3: Results from Methodological Experiments; 2011; Burton, J., Budd, S., Gilbert, E., Jaeckle, A., McFall, S., Uhrig, S.C. N.
- The Effect of a Mixed Mode Wave on Subsequent Attrition in a Panel Survey: Evidence from the Understanding...; 2011; Lynn, P.
- Yes, no, maybe. Effectiveness and Effects of Recruiting Strategies for Online Access Panels; 2011; Dale, T., Marksten, O. M. Walsoe, H.
- Dealing with the Effects of Panelist Experience; 2011; Burdein, I.
- Seeking the right blend: Part II: What happens when you mix panel respondents and social network respondents...; 2011; Gittelman, S. H., Portner, A.
- By the Numbers: Survey routers? Approach with caution; 2011; Ribeiro, E.
- The German Access Panel and the Impact of Response Propensities; 2011; Amarov, B., Enderle, T., Muennich, R., Rendtel, U., Zins, S.
- Long-Term Effects in the PPSM Access Panel; 2011; Bartsch, S., Vehre, H., Engel, U.
- Online-Telephone Mixed-Mode Surveys Question Wording Experiments in The Netherlands and Germany; 2011; de Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J.
- Equivalence of Measures of Xenophobia in Cross National Survey Research: Findings Based on a Web Probing...; 2011; Bandilla, W., Behr, D., Braun, M., Kaczmirek, L., Majer, S.
- Methodological Issues in Internet-Mediated Research: A Randomized Comparison of Internet Versus Mailed...; 2011; Whitehead, L.
- Explaining Unit Nonresponse in Online Panel Surveys: An Application of the Extended Theory of Planned...; 2011; Haunberger, S.
- Nonparametric Tests of Panel Conditioning and Attrition Bias in Panel Surveys; 2011; Das, M., Toepoel, V., van Soest, A.
- Exploring Health-related Experiences and Access to Care: Differences between Online and Telephone Survey...; 2011; Doty, M. M., Peugh, J., Shand-Lubbers, J.
- Collaborative systems for enhancing the analysis of social surveys: the Grid Enabled Specialist Data...; 2011; Lambert, P., Warner, G., Doherty, T., McCafferty, S., Watt, J., Comerford, M., Gayle, V., Tan, L.,...
- Development of a Web-Based Survey for Monitoring Daily Health and its Application in an Epidemiological...; 2011; Sugiura, H., Ohkusa, Y., Akahane, M., Sano, T., Okabe, N., Imamura, T.
- A new approach to the analysis of survey drop-out. Results from Follow-up Surveys in the German Longitudinal...; 2011; Rossmann, J., Blumenstiel, J. E., Steinbrecher, M.
- Tracking the decision-making process – Findings from an Online Rolling Cross-Section Panel Study...; 2011; Faas, T.
- Social desirability and self-reported health risk behaviors in web-based research: three longitudinal...; 2011; Crutzen, R., Goeritz, A.
- Quota Controls: Science or merely Sciencey?; 2011; Cape, P. J.
- Rich Profiles – Or: What's the problem with self-disclosure data?; 2011; Tress, F.
- Who are leaving our panel: panel attrition and personality traits; 2011; Marchand, M.
- Mobile Research Apps – Adding New Capabilities to Market Research; 2011; Rieber, D.
- The influence of personality traits and motives for joining on participation behavior in online panels...; 2011; Keusch, F.
- Asking sensitive questions in a recruitment interview for an online panel: the income question; 2011; Schaurer, I., Struminskaya, B., Kaczmirek, L., Bandilla, W.
- Determinants of access-panel participation: Recent experiences from the recruitment of members for a...; 2011; Engel, U., Bartsch, S., Vehre, H.
- Respondent Characteristics as Explanations for Uninformative Survey Response: Sources of Nondifferentiation...; 2011; Van Meurs, L., Klausch, L. T., Schoenbach, K.
- Individual differences in motivation to participate in online panels; 2011; Bruggen, E., Wetzels, M., de Ruyter, K., Schillewaert, N.
- In the market for an online panel? What clients need to know; 2011; Hartmann, S.
- DDI and the Lifecycle of Longitudinal Surveys; 2011; Hoyle, L., Wackerow, J.
- Dissemination of survey (meta)data in the LISS data archive; 2011; Streefkerk, M., Elshout, S.
- Does the direction of Likert-type scales influence response behavior in web surveys?; 2011; Keusch, F.
- Cognitive interviewing in web surveys: the use of probing questions in cross-national web surveys; 2011; Behr, D., Braun, M., Kaczmirek, L., Bandilla, W.
- Using propensity score matching to separate mode- and selection effects; 2011; Lugtig, P. J., Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J.
- Flexibility of Web Surveys: Probing 'do-not-know' over the Phone and on the Web; 2011; Hox, J., de Leeuw, E. D.
- Mobile-only – Persistent status or passage in the life course? Results from a Mobile Phone Panel...; 2011; Busse, B., Fuchs, M., Neuert, C.
- Ethical Dilemmas in Dealing with Web Paradata; 2011; Couper, M. P., Singer, E.
- Building Online Panels in the Social Media Age; 2011; Loeb, C.
- Mode Effect or Question Wording? Measurement Error in Mixed Mode Surveys; 2011; de Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J., Scherpenzeel, A.
- Data Collection in a Probability-Based Internet Panel: How the LISS Panel Was Built and How It Can Be...; 2011; Scherpenzeel, A.
- Comments on "Socially desirable crime reporting in victimization surveys"; 2011; Vollaard, B.
- Socially Desirable Crime Rates? A Dutch Study on Socially Desirable Responding and its Impact on the...; 2011; Heemskerk, M., van Wilsem, J.
- Framing Effects and Expected Social Security Claiming Behavior; 2011; Brown, J., Kapteyn, A., Mitchell, O. S.
- Building an Online Immigrant Panel: Response and Representativity; 2011; Scherpenzeel, A.

