Web Survey Bibliography
Title Do millennial undergraduates’ views of writing differ when surveyed online versus on paper?
Author Kim, H., Musallam, A. B., Schallert, D. L.
Source Computers in Human Behaviour, 27, 5, pp. 1915-1921
Year 2011
Database ScienceDirect
Access date 22.08.2011
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to test whether different survey delivery conditions made a difference in assessing college students’ practices, affect, and conceptions of academic and nonacademic writing. The delivery conditions represented combinations of three underlying factors: survey format (online versus paper-and-pencil), location (classroom, lab, home), and supervision (proctored or not). Participants (N = 268) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) a paper version of the survey administered in classrooms at scheduled proctored sessions; (2) an online version administered in scheduled proctored sessions in a computer lab; (3) an online version at a location and time of the students’ choice. The survey had 103 closed-ended and three open-response questions. Results showed different participation rates across conditions and more variability in time spent for the “home online” group. However, there were few differences by condition to substantive questions regarding the students’ practices, conceptions, and affective responses associated with writing. The only place where responses differed by condition was in response to the optional open-ended evaluation of the survey.
Access/Direct link
ScienceDirect (abstract) / (full text)
Year of publication2011
Bibliographic typeJournal article
Web Survey Bibliography - Computers in Human Behaviour (45)
- Virtual research assistants: Replacing human interviewers by automated avatars in virtual worlds; 2013; Hasler, B. S., Tuchman, P., Friedman, D.
- Compared to a small, supervised lab experiment, a large, unsupervised web-based experiment on a previously...; 2013; Ryan, R. S., Wilde, M., Crist, S.
- Comparison of web-based versus paper-and-pencil administration of a humor survey; 2013; Wang, C.-C., Cheng, C.-L.;, Liu, K.-S., Cheng, Y.-Y.
- Improving retention rate and response quality in Web-based surveys; 2012; Sánchez-Fernández, J., Muñoz-Leiva, F., Montoro-Ríos, F. J.
- Does survey format influence self-disclosure on sensitive question items?; 2012; Kays, K., Gathercoal, K., Buhrow, W.
- Do millennial undergraduates’ views of writing differ when surveyed online versus on paper? ; 2011; Kim, H., Musallam, A. B., Schallert, D. L.
- Reliability and validity of self-reported burnout in college students: A cross randomized comparison...; 2011; Bonafé, F. S. S., Campos, J. A. D. B., Jordani, P. C., Lucindo Zucoloto, M., Maroco, J.
- Measurement invariance in training evaluation: Old question, new context; 2011; P., Gissel, A., Stoughton, J. W., Whelan, T. J.Clark, A. P.
- Color red in web-based knowledge testing; 2010; Gnambs, T., , Batinic, B.Appel, M.
- Internet administration of self-report measures commonly used in research on social anxiety disorder...; 2010; Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., Rück, C., Furmark, T., Carlbring, P., Lindefors, N., Andersson, G.
- Comparison of paper-and-pencil versus Web administration of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS): Participation...; 2010; Denniston, M. M., Brener, N. D., Kann, L., Eaton, D. K., McManus, T., Kyle, T. M., Roberts, A. M., Flint...
- Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review; 2010; Fan, W., Yan, Z.
- Psychometric properties of internet administered versions of Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) and...; 2009; Zlomke, K. R.
- Web-based measurement: Effect of completing single or multiple items per webpage; 2009; Thorndike, F. P., Carlbring, P., Smyth, F. L., Magee, J. C., Gonder-Frederick, L., Ost, L. G., Ritterband...
- Sensitive topics: Are there modal differences?; 2009; Uriell, Z. A., Dudley, C. M.
- Effects of innovativeness and trust on web survey participation; 2008; Fang, J., Shao, P., Lan, G.
- From paper to pixels: A comparison of paper and computer formats in psychological assessment ; 2008; Naus, M. J., Philipp, L. M., Samsi, M.
- Measuring self-disclosure online: Blurring and non-response to sensitive items in web-based surveys; 2008; Joinson, A. N., Paine, C., Buchanan, T., Reips, U. -D.
- The impact of computer versus paper–pencil survey, and individual versus group administration,...; 2008; Bates, S. C., Cox, J. M.
- Reliability, equivalence and respondent preference of computerized versus paper-and-pencil mental health...; 2007; Wijndaele, K. et al.
- Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires; 2007; Booth-Kewley, S., Larson, G. E., Miyoshi, D. K.
- Personalization, authentication and self-disclosure in self-administered Internet surveys; 2007; Joinson, A. N., Woodley, A., Reips, U. -D.
- Internet vs. paper and pencil administration of questionnaires commonly used in panic/agoraphobia research...; 2007; Carlbring, P., Brunt, S., Bohman, S., Austin, D., Richards, J., Oest, L.-G., Andersson, G.
- Reliability of self-report: paper versus online administration; 2007; Luce, K. H., Winzelberg, A. J., Das, S., Osborne, M. I., Bryson, S. W., Taylor, C. B.
- Internet-based attitude assessment: does gender affect measurement equivalence?; 2007; Whitaker, B. G.
- Personalized salutation, power of sender and response rates to Web-based surveys; 2007; Joinson, A. N., Reips, U. -D.
- Do print and Web surveys provide the same results?; 2006; Huang, H. -M.
- Computer-assisted questionnaires may facilitate collection of quality-of-life (QOL) data: At a cost; 2006; Smith, A. B., Velikova, G., Wright, E. P., Lynch, P., Selby, P. J.
- Using scantron versus an audience response system for survey research: Does methodology matter when...; 2005; Bunz, U.
- Exploring users' attitudes and intentions toward the web as a survey tool; 2005; Huang, H. -M., Liaw, S. S.
- Short Web-based versions of the perceived stress (PSS) and Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression...; 2004; Herrero, J., Meneses, J.
- Differences between 'talking about' and 'admitting' sensitive behaviour in anonymous and non-anonymous...; 2004; Muehlenfeld, H. -U.
- Accessibility and acceptance of responsive virtual human technology as a survey interviewer training...; 2004; Link, M. W., Armsby, P. P., Hubal, R. C., Guinn, C. I.
- Flow on the net: detecting Web users' positive affects and their flow states; 2004; Chen, H.
- Implementing multilingual touch-screen audio-CASI applications; 2004; Cooley, P. C., Ganapathi, L., Li, S.
- Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of...; 2004; Barbeite, F. G., Weiss, E. M.
- Humanizing self-administered surveys: experiments on social presence in web and IVR surveys; 2003; Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., Stegier, D.M.Steiger, D. M.; de Rouvray, C.
- Using pencil and paper, Internet and touch-tone phones for self-administered surveys: does methodology...; 2003; Knapp, H., Kirk, S. A.
- Private e-mail requests and the diffusion of responsibility; 2002; Barron, G., Yechiam, E.
- An Internet survey for perceptions of computers and the World Wide Web: relationship, prediction, and...; 2002; Shu Shenga, L.
- Using touch screen audio-CASI to obtain data on sensitive topics; 2001; Cooley, P. C., Rogers, S. M., Al-Tayyib, A. A., Ganapathi, L. F., Willis, G. B., Turner, C. F.
- Insuring sample equivalence across internet and paper-and-pencil assessments; 2001; Epstein, J., Klinkenberg, W. D., Wiley, D., McKinley, L.
- From Eliza to Internet: a brief history of computerized assessment; 2001; Epstein, J., Klinkenberg, W. D.
- Exploring the use of the World Wide Web as a psychology data collection tool; 1999; Pettit, F. A.
- Ethical research in the information age: Beginning the dialog; 1997; Schrum, L.