Web Survey Bibliography - Noncoverage & sampling (1271)

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
...
• 26

• Convenient yet not a convenience sample: Jury pools as experimental subject pools; 2013; Murray, G. R., Rugeley, C. R., Mitchell, D.-G., Mondak, J. J.
• The equivalence of Internet versus paper-based surveys in IT/IS adoption research in collectivistic...; 2013; Fang, J., Wen, C., Prybutok, V.
• Incentives for college student participation in web-based substance use surveys; 2013; Patrick, M. E., Singer, E., Boyd, C. J., Cranford, J. A., McCabe, S. E.
• Sample composition discrepancies in different stages of a probability-based online panel; 2013; Bosnjak, M., Haas, I., Galesic, M., Kaczmirek, L., Bandilla, W., Couper, M. P.
• A comparison of data quality and practicality of online versus postal questionnaires in a sample of...; 2013; King, M. T., Butow, P., Olver, I., Smith, A. B.
• The rise of the "connected viewer"; 2012; Smith, A., Boyles, J. L.
• The effects of item saliency and question design on measurement error in a self-administered survey; 2012; Stern, M. J., Smyth, J. D., Mendez, J.
• Smartphone ownership update: September 2012; 2012; Rainie, L.
• Research company spotlight - Mobile surveys; 2012
• Participation of mobile users in traditional online studies; 2012; Jue, A.
• More dirty little secrets of online panel research.; 2012
• Mobile email opens report 2nd half 2011; 2012
• Guide to social science data preparation. Best practice throughout the data life cycle; 2012
• GMI Pinnacle; 2012
• Social media as a data collection tool: the impact of Facebook in behavioural research; 2012; Zoppos, E.
• Smartphone Apps and User Engagement: Collecting Data in the Digital Era; 2012; Link, M. W.
• Snowball Sampling in Online Social Networks; 2012; Raissi, M., Ackland, R.
• The Use of Facebook as a Locating and Contacting Tool; 2012; McCarthy, T.
• The war against unengaged online respondents; 2012; Gittelman, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
• Qualitatively Speaking: The five absolute, no-excuse must-dos for online qualitative researchers; 2012; Rossow, A.
• By the Numbers: Lessons for using online panels in B2B research; 2012; Elsner, N.
• Experience Sampling and Ecological Momentary Assessment; 2012; Stone, A.
• Can Microtargeting Improve Survey Sampling? An Assessment of Accuracy and Bias in Consumer File Marketing...; 2012; Pasek, J.
• Cognitive Evaluation of Survey Instruments: State of the Science (Art?) and Future Directions; 2012; Willis, G. B.
• Oh, Just One More Thing … Leveraging “Leave-Behinds” in Data Collection; 2012; Link, M. W.
• Can Official Records Correct Errors in Turnout Self-reports?; 2012; Berent, M., Krosnick, J. A., Lupia, A.
• Modes of Data Collection; 2012; Tourangeau, R.
• Probability vs. Non-probability Methods; 2012; Langer, G,
• Sampling for Single and Multi-Mode Surveys using Address-Based Sampling; 2012; O'Muircheartaigh, C.
• Proxy Reporting; 2012; Cobb, C. L.
• Measure the response burden in the Swedish Intrastat system; 2012; Weideskog, F.
• Boosting Web pick-up Rates by referring to Compliance Principles ; 2012; Falnes-Dalheim, E., Haraldsen, G., Sundvoll, A.
• An experimental investigation of the effects of noncontingent and contingent incentives in recruiting...; 2012; Lavrakas, P. J., Dennis, J. M., Peugh, J., Shand-Lubbers, J., Lee, E., Peugh, J., Charlebois, O., Murakami...
• Response Mode Choice and the Hard-to-Interview in the American Community Survey; 2012; Nichols, E. M., Horwitz, R., Guarino Tancreto, J.
• Recruiting in an Internet panel using respondent driven sampling; 2012; Schonlau, M.
• A Choice in Mode: A Solution for Increasing Response Rates of Hard-to-Survey Populations?; 2012; Haan, M., Ongena, Y. P.
• The Feasibility of Conducting a Web Survey Using Respondent Driven Sampling among Transgenders in the...; 2012; Kappelhof, J.
• Use of Response Propensities; 2012; Bethlehem, J., Biffignandi, S.
• Weighting Adjustment Techniques; 2012; Bethlehem, J., Biffignandi, S.
• Probabilistic survey questions and incorrect answers: Retirement income replacement rates; 2012; van Santen, P., Alessie, R., Kalwij, A.
• Combining Mail and E-Mail Contacts to Facilitate Participation in Mixed-Mode Surveys; 2012; Israel, G. D.
• Prenotification, Incentives, and Survey Modality: An Experimental Test of Methods to Increase Survey...; 2012; Tepper, J. R., Jacob, B.
• Reaching and Hearing the Invisible: Organizational Research on Invisible Stigmatized Groups via Web...; 2012; Trau, R. N. C., Haertel, C. E. J., Haertel, G. F.
• An Overlooked Approach in Survey Research: Total Survey Error; 2012; Bautista, R.
• An assessment of equivalence between Internet and paper-based surveys: evidence from collectivistic...; 2012; Fang, J., Wen, C., Prybutok, V.
• Using screen video capture software to aide and inform cognitive interviewing; 2012; Chaney, B. H., Barry, A. E., Chaney, J. D., Stellefson, M. L., Webb, M. C.
• Costs and Errors in Fixed and Mobile Phone Surveys; 2012; Vehovar, V., Slavec, A., Berzelak, N.
• Building Your Own Online Panel Via E-Mail and Other Digital Media; 2012; Toepoel, V.
• Use of Web 2.0 to Recruit Australian Gay Men to an Online HIV/AIDS Survey; 2012; Theriault, N., Bi, P., Hiller, J. E., Nor, M.
• The World's Simplest Survey Microsimulator (WSSM); 2012; Karr, A. F., Cox, L. H.

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
...
• 26