Web Survey Bibliography - Online qualitative research (761)

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
...
• 16

• Does survey experience affect respondents’ reported level of satisfaction?; 2012; Schultz Christensen, A., Ladenburg, J.
• Evaluation of an online (opt-in) panel for public participation geographic information systems surveys...; 2012; Brown, G., Weber, D., Zanon, D., de Bie, K.
• Developing an Online GIS-based Survey Instrument to Elicit Perceived Neighborhood Information for Environmental...; 2012; Carr, J., Johnson, I., Keene, R., Landry, P., Gradeck, R., Lucht, J., Beach, S., Clougherty, J.
• Studying Migrants with the Help of the Internet: Methods from Psychology; 2012; Reips, U. -D., Buffardi, L.
• Panel Conditioning in Online Survey Panels: Problems of Increased Sophistication and Decreased Engagemeent...; 2012; Adams, A. N., Atkeson, L. R., Karp, J. A.
• Efficiency of Different Recruitment Strategies for Web Panels; 2012; Hansen, K. M., Pedersen, R. T.
• Improving Representativeness In Online Surveys Using A Combined Internet/Postal Approach: Evidence From...; 2012; Atorough, P., Donaldson, B., Harris, A.
• Surveying Rare Populations Using a Probabilitybased Online Panel; 2012; Peugh, J., Wright, G.
• Nonresponse and Online Student Evaluations of Teaching: Understanding the Influence of Salience...; 2012; Adams, M. J. D., Umbach, P. D.
• Innovation der Online-Datenerhebung für wissenschaftliche Forschungen. Das niederländische MESS-Projekt...; 2012; Das, M.
• Do Questions about Watching Internet Pornography Make People Watch Internet Pornography? A Comparison...; 2012; Peter, J., Valkenburg, P. M.
• “I think I know what you did last summer” Improving data quality in panel surveys; 2012; Lugtig, P. J.
• Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 4: Results from Methodological Experiments; 2012; Burton, J., Budd, S., Gilbert, E., Jaeckle, A., Kaminska, O., Uhrig, S.C. N., Brown, M., Calderwood,...
• The Propensity of Older Respondents to Participate in a General Purpose Survey; 2012; Lynn, P.
• Mode-Switch Protocols: How a Seemingly Small Design Difference can affect Attrition Rates and Attrition...; 2012; Lynn, P.
• Deep Data: Qualitative Approaches to E-Research in the Digital Age; 2012; Salmons, J.
• Going online with a face-to-face household panel: Initial results from an experiment on the UK Household...; 2012; Jaeckle, A., Lynn, P., Burton, J.
• The use of new technologies on the British Birth Cohort Studies; 2012; Calderwood, L.
• Online Data Collection in the Agro-Food Sector; 2012; Biffignandi, S., Artaz, R.
• Reaching Under/Never Screened Populations Using an Online Survey; 2012; Filsinger, B., Gesink, D., Mihic, A., Kreiger, N.
• Comparing Ranking Techniques in Web Surveys; 2012; Blasius, J.
• Surveying general population: What types of experiments are further needed?; 2012; Vehovar, V., Berzelak, N.
• Psychometric properties of an internet administered version of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability...; 2012; Vesteinsdottir, V., Reips, U. -D., Joinson, A. N., Porsdottir, F.
• Research design for studying online communities with web surveys; 2012; Petrovcic, A., Petric, G., Lozar Manfreda, K.
• “What a waste of time!” vs “Why not participate?” On sentiments by business...; 2012; Torres van Grinsven, V., Snijkers, G., Daas, P.
• Effect of different stimulus on data quality in online panels; 2012; Zagar, S., Lozar Manfreda, K.
• GESIS Online Access Panel Pilot Study: Recruitment and Panel Maintenance; 2012; Kaczmirek, L., Bandilla, W., Schaurer, I., Struminskaya, B., Weyandt, K.
• The German Internet Panel: First Results from the Recruitment Phases; 2012; Blom, A. G.
• Panel retention rate and data quality: experimental results drawing on Reciprocity design; 2012; Biffignandi, S., Artaz, R.
• Analysis of coverage bias for the implementation of web surveys in Spain; 2012; de Pedraza, P., Serrano, F.
• Web panels in Slovenia; 2012; Lenar, J., Vehovar, V.
• Adaptation of Cognitive Interviews for Web; 2012; Mohorko, A., Hlebec, V.
• Database Lookup in Web Surveys; 2012; Couper, M. P., Zhang, C., Conrad, F. G., Tourangeau, R.
• Solving the Mode Mystery The Cost, Coverage and Quality Tradeoffs of Picking (and Mixing) Online and...; 2012; Cape, P. J., Phillips, K.
• A report on the Confirmit Market Research Software Survey ; 2012; Macer, T., Wilson, S.Wilson, Sheila
• A beginner's guide to DIY research ; 2012; Cates, T.
• Why "mobile" (as we know it) is the wrong focus ; 2012; Smithee, B.
• Qualitatively Speaking: Mobile qualitative finally hits its stride; 2012; Bryson, J.
• Comfortable in the new medium: How online qual can benefit from our share-happy culture ; 2012; Rubenstein, P.
• Don't rush through the qualitative screening process ; 2012; Dodson, D.
• Appreciating the value of traditional research in a digital world; 2012; Turner, S.
• Mixing old and new qualitative methods ; 2012; Kaisner, C., Lindley , K.
• For winning qualitative, make it high-touch + high-tech; 2012; Barber, E., McIlrath, M.
• Sample Survey on Sensitive Topics: Investigating Respondents’ Understanding and Trust in Alternative...; 2012; De Schrijver, A.
• Preventative care to extend panelist’s lifetime: A driver analysis on panelist engagement; 2012; Johnson, E. P., Schiers, J.
• Consistency in Global Non-Probabilistic Online Samples; 2012; Gittelman, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
• How Online Technology May Open The Door to More Integrated Qual/Quant Research; 2012; Brandt, D., Markowitz, L.
• Innovation in online data collection for scientific research: the Dutch MESS project; 2012; Das, M.
• Clinicians’ Perspectives on a Web-Based System for Routine Outcome Monitoring in Old-Age Psychiatry...; 2012; Veerbeek, M. A., Voshaar, R. C. O., Pot, A. M.
• The Effectiveness of Survey Recruitment Methods in Second Life; 2012; Dean, E., Cook, S., Murphy, J., Keating, M.

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
...
• 16