Web Survey Bibliography - Internet access Panels (460)

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10

• The German Internet Panel: First Results from the Recruitment Phases; 2012; Blom, A. G.
• Panel retention rate and data quality: experimental results drawing on Reciprocity design; 2012; Biffignandi, S., Artaz, R.
• Web panels in Slovenia; 2012; Lenar, J., Vehovar, V.
• Preventative care to extend panelist’s lifetime: A driver analysis on panelist engagement; 2012; Johnson, E. P., Schiers, J.
• Consistency in Global Non-Probabilistic Online Samples; 2012; Gittelman, S. H., Trimarchi, E.
• Innovation in online data collection for scientific research: the Dutch MESS project; 2012; Das, M.
• Panel Conditioning: Results from Two Experiments in a Probability-based Online Panel; 2012; Struminskaya, B., Kaczmirek, L., Schaurer, I., Bandilla, W.
• Do Surveys that are Completed on Mobile Devices Differ from Surveys Completed Online, Over the Phone...; 2012; Gluck, A.
• Professional Respondents in Internet Panels: Who are They and What Do They Do to Our Data?; 2012; de Leeuw, E. D., Matthijsse, S.
• What Number of Scale Points in an Attitude Question Optimizes Response Validity and Administration Practicality...; 2012; Yeager, D. S., Anand, S., Krosnick, J. A.
• Using Online Panels for National Surveys of Low Incidence Populations: Findings from the CDC Influenza...; 2012; Boyle, J., Ball, S., Ding, H., Srinath, K. P., Euler, G.
• The Persistence of Attentiveness in Web Surveys: A Panel Study; 2012; Berinsky, A., Luks, S., Rivers, D.
• The Effect of Mode on Participant Responses to Qualitative Research in Virtual Worlds; 2012; Dipko, S., Billington, C., Brick, P. D.
• Investigating Nonresponse Bias in a Nonresponse Bias Study; 2012; Lavrakas, P. J., Dennis, J. M., Peugh, J., Shand-Lubbers, J., Lee, E., Charlebois, O.
• The Effects of Vignette Placement on Survey Estimates: A Split Ballot Experiment; 2012; Strohm, C. Q., Seltzer, J. A., Bianchi, S. M.
• Technique to Blend Probability and Non-probability Internet Samples; 2012; DiSogra, C.
• A Systematic Review of Studies Investigating the Quality of Data Obtained with Online Panels; 2012; Callegaro, M., Villar, A., Krosnick, J. A., Yeager, D. S.
• Exploring New Pathways to Survey Recruitment; 2012; Bilgram, V., Stadler, D.Jawecki, G.
• The “MediaLiveTracker” – A New Online-Tool for Real-Time-Response-Measurement; 2012; Kercher, J., Bachl, M., Voegele, C., Vohle, F.
• Data quality in MAWI and CAWI; 2012; Mavletova, A. M., Blasius, J.
• Can mobile-web surveys substitute classic web-surveys? Results from an exploratory, comparative method...; 2012; Bohn, A., Doering, N., Maxl, E.
• Scrutinizing Dynamics – Rolling panel waves in theory and practice; 2012; Faas, T., Blumenberg, J. N.
• The German Internet Panel: Design of a Probability-Based Online Survey; 2012; Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C., Holthausen, A., Riepe, C.
• The price we have to pay: Incentive experiments in the recruitment process for a probability-based online...; 2012; Schaurer, I., Struminskaya, B., Kaczmirek, L., Bandilla, W.
• FamilyVote – Conducting online surveys with children and families; 2012; Geissler, H., Peeters, H.
• New Insights about market research with an iPad-panel; 2012; Manouchehri, A., Rieber, D., Moughrabi, C.
• Reducing the Threat of Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys; 2012; Couper, M. P.
• Asking Probing Questions in Web Surveys: Which factors have an Impact on the Quality of Responses? ; 2012; Behr, D., Kaczmirek, L., Braun, M., Bandilla, W.
• Software Review: SurveySwipe; 2012; Macer, T.
• Data Use: Trying to bring the numbers alive ; 2012; Rung, J., Woll, B., Edstrom, C.
• Survey methods in an age of austerity: Driving value in survey design; 2012; Williams, J.
• Comparing Google Consumer Surveys to Existing Probability and Non-Probability Based Internet Surveys...; 2012; McDonald, P., Mohebbi, M., Slatkin, B.
• A Potential Solution for Easing Authentication of Respondents for a Web-Based Survey?; 2012; Baum, H. M.
• Exploring Animated Faces Scales in Web Surveys: Drawbacks and Prospects; 2012; Emde, M., Fuchs, M.
• Reminders in Web-Based Data Collection: Increasing Response at the Price of Retention?; 2012; Goeritz, A., Crutzen, R.
• The GfK NOP Media Efficiency Panel; 2011; Moy, C. et al.
• New Esomar survey on use of cookies and tracking technologies; 2011
• Knowledge Networks answers to ESOMAR's "25 Questions to Help Research Buyers"; 2011
• In search of a new approach to measure newspaper audiences in Canada: The journey continues; 2011; Crassweller, A. et al.
• Google and Kantar develop measurement panel; 2011
• ESOMAR AND CASRO submission to the W3C tracking protection working group - Market research techniques...; 2011
• “You are Invited to Participate”: Challenges of Applying Mixed Survey Methods to Assess...; 2011; Chew, F.
• Classic Inspirations for Social Research Methodology in the time of Online Access Panels ; 2011; Jeřábek, H.
• Beyond data stability: Rising above quality concerns; 2011
• Background - QSOAP; 2011
• Amazon's Mechanical Turk. A new source of inexpensive, yet high quality, data?; 2011; Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., Gosling, S. D.
• The optimal number of response options in internet panel surveys; 2011; Thorsdottir, F.
• Online Research @ GESIS; 2011; Kaczmirek, L., Lenzner, T.
• E-dater, Artificial Actors, and German Households; 2011; Hebing, M.
• Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 3: Results from Methodological Experiments; 2011; Burton, J., Budd, S., Gilbert, E., Jaeckle, A., McFall, S., Uhrig, S.C. N.

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10