Web Survey Bibliography
The article examines the structure of the collaboration networks of research groups where Slovenian and Spanish PhD students are pursuing their doctorate. The units of analysis are studentsupervisor dyads. We use duocentred networks, a novel network structure appropriate for networks which are centred around a dyad. A cluster analysis reveals three typical clusters of research groups. Those which are large and belong to several institutions are labelled under a bridging social capital label. Those which are small, centred in a single institution but have high cohesion are labelled as bonding social capital. Those which are small and with low cohesion are called weak social capital groups. Academic performance of both PhD students and supervisors are highest in bridging groups and lowest in weak groups. Other variables are also found to differ according to the type of research group. At the end, some recommendations regarding academic and research policy are drawn.
Metodološki zvezki (abstract) / (full text)
Web Survey Bibliography - Coromina, L. (5)
- PhD Students’ Research Group Networks. A Qualitative Approach; 2011; Coromina, L., Capo, A., Coenders, G., Guia, J.
- PhD Students’ Research Group Social Capital in Two Countries: A Clustering Approach with Duocentred...; 2011; Coenders, G., Coromina, L., Ferligoj, A., Guia, J.
- Reliability and validity of egocentered network data collected via web: A meta-analysis of multilevel...; 2006; Coromina, L., Coenders, G.
- Web survey design for predicting performance using network questions; 2005; Coromina, L.
- Effect of Background, Motivational and Social Network Variables on Academic Performance of PhD Students...; 2005; Guia, J., Coromina, L., Coenders, G.