Web Survey Bibliography
Title 26 questions to help research buyers of online samples
Source ESOMAR
Year 2008
Access date 07.03.2013
Full text
Abstract
This document serves as an official response to Esomar’s “26 questions to help research buyers of online samples” and provides detailed insight to the operational integrity and panel management practices employed by panelbase.com. Esomar’s guidelines on conducting market and opinion research using the internet are designed to provide advice on these issues. In order to ensure a credible and robust research panel, panelbase.com has embraced these guidelines alongside strong data management principles, sound business ethics, and an overall integrity that underpins the development of its research community.
Access/Direct link
Homepage (Abstract)/ (Full text)
Year of publication2008
Bibliographic typeConferences, workshops, tutorials, presentations
Web survey bibliography - ESOMAR (16)
- 28 Questions to Help Buyers of Online Samples; 2015; Cape, P. J.; Phillips, A.; Baker, R.; Cooke, M.; Ribeiro, E.; Terhanian, G.
- Global market research 2013; 2013
- Global market research 2012; 2012
- New Esomar survey on use of cookies and tracking technologies; 2011
- Global market research 2011; 2011
- 26 questions to help research buyers of online samples; 2008
- Using global online panels; 2008; Pearson, C., Smith, E., Ridlen, R., Zhang, H., Cooper, A
- The quest for on-line quality research; 2008; Rhall, T., Fine, B.
- ICC/ESOMAR International code on market and social research; 2007
- Global market research 2007; 2007
- Web 2.0 & panels. The shift from lectures to conversations; 2006; Cook, M., Buckley, N.
- The effect of conditioning when re-interviewing; 2006; Cartwright, T., Nancarrow, C.
- Global market research 2006; 2006
- Benefits and challenges of multi-sourcing. Understanding differences between sample sources; 2006; de Gaudemar, O.
- Attitudinal differences. Comparing people who belong to multiple versus single panels; 2006; Casdas, D., Fine, B., Menictas, C.
- Assessing individual respondents' quality. An innovative scoring system; 2006; Loeb, C.,Hartmann, A.