Web Survey Bibliography
Title Assessment of Mode-Effects in a Web-enabled Study of Civic Attitudes
Access date 14.06.2004
Abstract Using an RDD-recruited Web-enabled panel to collect survey data combines the convenience of self-administered Web data collection with the statistical rigor of probability sampling. However, Web-enabled panels generally suffer from low overall response rates due to the nonresponse at the recruitment, installation, screening, and cooperation stages. Non-response follow-up surveys (NRFUS) have been employed in past studies to adjust the population estimates. The NRFUS is conducted via CATI, which may introduce bias due to the change in data collection mode from the main study. This study examines the potential for mode bias in NRFUS using a split sample design with CATI and Web-enabled data collection. The survey was conducted by collecting independent samples of panel members via telephone and a Web panel supported by Knowledge Networks. Follow-up on non-respondents was also conducted. The mode effect is measured for this study, and statistical methods of weighting the observations are examined--through which the mode effect could be reduced in future studies involving the Web-enabled panel. The effect of any adjustment upon the variance of the estimates is also examined.
Access/Direct link Homepage - conference (abstract)
Bibliographic typeConference proceedings
Year of publication2002
Web Survey Bibliography - Weighting & imputation (279)
- How Too Little Can Give You a Little Too Much: Determining the Number of Household Phone Lines in RDD...; 2008; Merkle, D., Langer, G.
- Internet surveys; 2008; Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., Koren, G.
- Handbook on Data Quality Assessment Methods and Tools; 2007; Ehling, M. (ed.), Koerner, T. (ed.), Bergdahl, M., Elvers, E., Foeldesi, E., Kron, A., Lohauss, P.,...
- Sample bias, weights and efficiency of weights in a continuous web voluntary survey; 2007; de Pedraza, P., Tijdens, K., de Bustillo, R.
- Utility and happiness; 2007; Kimball, M. S., Willis, R.
- The case for publishing (some) online polls; 2007; Taylor, H.
- Sampling for web surveys; 2007; Rivers, D.
- Reinterview: A tool for survey quality improvement; 2007; Feindt, P. et al.
- Reconstructing childhood health histories using internet panels; 2007; Smith, J. P.
- Online-questionnaire design guidelines; 2007; Lumsden, J.
- Nonresponse Bias in Two Methods of Panel Recruitment ; 2007; DiSogra, C., Slotwiner, D., Clinton, S., Chan, E., Hendarwan, E., & Zheng, W.
- A Nonparametric Approach to Weighting Web Panel Data; 2007; Thorburn, D., Lorenc, B.
- Calibration and propensity score weighting in web surveys; 2007; Fabrizi, E., Biffignandi, S.
- THE READERSHIP CURRENCY: DUTCH DESIGN How a new methodology for AIR measurement opens up new perspectives...; 2007; Petric, I., Appel, M.
- Intention to Participate in Web Surveys: An Extended TPB Model; 2007; Fang, J., Shao, P., Wan, J.
- The Usage of Magnitude Estimation Scales in Online Surveys - Results of a Joint Project; 2007; Althoff, S., Dumke, U.
- Calibration and Propensity Score Weighting in Web Surveys; 2007; Fabrizi, E., Biffignandi, S.
- Quality issues in online research; 2007; Sparrow, N.
- Comparison of Data Collection Procedures; 2007; Saris, W. E.
- The Effect of Changing Sample Composition on Time-Variation in Reported Business Conditions; 2007; van der Klaauw, W., Bram, J., Deitz, R., Orr, J., Topa, G.
- Perspektive Deutschland -- a Case Study of a Very Large Internet Survey; 2007; Boersch-Supan, A., Esner, D., Fassbender, H., Kiefer, R., McFadden, D., Winter, J.
- Are ‘Webographic' or Attitudinal Questions Useful for Adjusting Estimates from Web Surveys Using...; 2007; Schonlau, M., van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A.
- Development and Analysis of Joint Internet-Telephone Hunter Surveys; 2007; Lukacs, P. M.
- Peeping Over Computers The Slovenian Internet Audience Measurement Mix Model ; 2007; Cucin, P., Kropivnik, S., Hocevar, J.
- What's Missing from National RDD Surveys? The Impact of Growing Cell-Only Population.; 2007; Keeter, S., Kennedy, C., Tompson, T., Mokrzycki, M., Clark, A.
- Combining Cell Phone and Landline Samples: Dual Frame Approach.; 2007; ZuWallack, R. S.
- Statistics for real-life sample surveys: non-simple-random samples and weighted data; 2006; Dorofeev, S., Grant, P.
- Sample matching. Representative sampling from Internet panels; 2006; Rivers, D.
- A framework for survey breakoffs; 2006; Peytchev, A.
- Assessing Panel Bias in the Knowledge Networks Panel: Updated Results from 2005 Research ; 2006; Pineau, V., Nukulkij, P., Tang, X.
- Weighting an Internet Panel Survey on Drug Use and Abuse; 2006; Gordek, H., Williams, R. L., Dai, L.
- Supplementing RDD Surveys with Web-Based Survey Data; 2006; Krotki, K.
- Web Survey Methodology (WebSM) Portal; 2006; Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.
- Propensity Score Adjustment as a Weighting Scheme for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys; 2006; Lee, Sunghee
- Selection Bias in Web Surveys and the Use of Propensity Scores; 2006; Schonlau, M., van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A., Couper, M. P.
- Comparing Internet Users and Nonusers’ Behavior toward Market Products; 2006; Diaz-Tena, N., Benford, R.
- Correcting for bias in a self-selected sample using a random sample as auxiliary information: the Dutch...; 2006; Oberski, D.
- The shift to on-line research. Managing and taking advantage of it.; 2006; Alexander, J., Fine, J., Davies, S.
- Make the Connection: Recruit for online surveys offline as well; 2006; Enright, A.
- Evaluating the Transition of an Ongoing RDD Survey to a Dual Mode-Dual Frame RDD/Internet Survey; 2006; Dutwin, D., Herrmann, M., Kulp, D., Lavine, S.
- Estimation in surveys with nonresponse; 2005; Sarndal, C.-E., Lundstrom, S.
- Does weighting for nonresponse increase the variance of survey means?; 2005; Little, R. J., Vartivarian, S.
- Comparing data from online and face-to-face surveys; 2005; Duffy, C., Smith, K., Terhanian, G., Bremer, J.
- Factors to Weigh When Considering Electronic Data Collection; 2005; Courtney, K. L., Craven, C. K.
- Thoughts on Internet Research in Europe; 2005; Harris Interactive
- Web surveys: inference using weighting and imputation in the survey on graduates; 2005; Biffignandi, S., Fabrizi, E., Pratesi, M., Salvati, N.
- The Use of Multiple Imputation to Create a Null Data Set from Nonrandomized Job Training Data; 2005; Rubin, D. B.
- Creative Applications of Selection Bias Modelling in Market Research; 2005; Terhanian, G., Bremer, J.
- Online-Access-Panels Based on Probability Samples: Can they Yield Representative Results?; 2005; Bandilla, W.
- Simple Approaches to Estimating the Variance of the Propensity Score Weighted Estimator Applied on Volunteer...; 2005; Isaksson, A., Lee, Sunghee; de Rouvray, C.