Web Survey Bibliography

Title A web-based survey of midwives’ perceptions of women using the Internet in pregnancy: a global phenomenon
Source Midwifery, 27, 2, pp. 273-281
Year 2011
Access date 18.02.2015
Full text

PDF (241 kb)

Abstract

Objectives: to ascertain the views of midwives on Internet use in midwifery practice, to elicit the extent and nature of pregnant women's use of the Internet from a midwifery perspective, and to explore midwives’ perceptions of pregnant women using the Internet as an information source.

Setting: 12 online midwifery discussion fora.

Design: a cross-sectional exploratory descriptive web-based survey.

Methodology: midwives from midwifery e-discussion groups who had direct contact with pregnant women were invited to share their experiences of working with women who presented them with information gleaned from the Internet.

Participants: an international sample of 303 midwives accessed and completed a web-based questionnaire.

Results: the vast majority of midwives who responded (89%, n=271) perceived an increase in Internet use among pregnant women. Midwives reported that women used the Internet to obtain information on a broad range of pregnancy-related topics. Most (86%, n=260) had experience of a pregnant woman discussing information from the Internet with them in the past year. A concerned minority (19%, n=49) regarded the information retrieved by the women to be either ‘not very’ or ‘not at all’ accurate. Two-thirds (67%, n=174) considered that the information had an effect on how the woman thought her pregnancy should be managed.

Key conclusions: this study provides evidence of pregnant women accessing the Internet to obtain information related to their pregnancy. Midwives recognise that pregnant women are increasingly using the Internet as an accessible resource for information to inform decision-making in pregnancy. This presents a number of challenges for midwives.

Access/Direct link

Homepage (Abstract)/ (Full text)

Year of publication2011
Bibliographic typeJournal article
Print

Web survey bibliography - 2011 (622)

Page:
Page: