Web Survey Bibliography (6367)

Page:

• 1
...
• 99
• 100
• 101
...
• 128

• Mail and Web Surveys: A Cost and Response Rate Comparison in a Study on Students Housing Conditions; 2002; Forsman, G., Varedian, M.
• Paper and Pencil versus Web Survey. Measurement Effects and Mode Differences; 2002; Fuchs, M.
• An evaluation of the effect of response formats on data quality in Web surveys; 2002; Heerwegh, D., Loosveldt, G.
• Improving Unit-Nonresponse Error Correction in Online Surveys Using Multi-Dimensional Response Models...; 2002; Lukawetz, G.
• Toward a Typology of Internet Users and Online Privacy Concerns; 2002; Sheehan, K. B.
• Internet surveys: the role of time in firms response behaviour; 2002; Biffignandi, S., Pratesi, M.
• Usability Testing of Web Data Collection Instruments; 2002; Thalji, L., Antunes, M. J., Wiebe, E. F.
• Nonresponse Error and Mode Effects in the Web-Enabled Survey on Civic Attitudes and Behaviors after...; 2002; Thalji, L., Langer, M., Pulliam, P., Wiebe, E. F.
• Internet Surveys and Data Quality - A Review; 2002; Tuten, T. L., Urban, D.J., Bosnjak, M.
• Forms of Research in MUDs; 2002; Utz, S.
• Not Sure About "Don't Know"?: Effects of Response Choice in Mixed Mode Surveys; 2002; Terhanian, G., Thomas, R. K., Bremer, J., Smith, R.
• More Is Not Necessarily Better: Effects of Response Categories on Measurement Stability and Validity; 2002; Thomas, R. K., Uldall, B. R., Krosnick, J. A.
• A Web-based Experiment to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Vaccine Information Sheets; 2002; Turner, A., Thalji, L., Wagers, R., Laird, G., Heaps, W.
• Reliability and Validity of Web-based Surveys: Effects of Response Modality, Item Format, and Number...; 2002; Uldall, B. R., Thomas, R. K., Krosnick, J. A.
• Mode Effect in Web Surveys; 2002; Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K.
• Reasons for unit and partial nonresponse in Web surveys; 2002; Vehovar, V., Koren, G., Lozar Manfreda, K.
• Nonresponse in Web Surveys; 2002; Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., Zaletel, M., Batagelj, Z.
• Web-Surveys - An Appropriate Mode of Data-Collection for the Social Sciences?; 2002; Bandilla, W.
• Generalizability Issues in Internet-Based Survey Research: Implications for the Internet Addiction Controversy...; 2002; Bremer, J.
• Online Panels; 2002; Reinhold, N., Batinic, B., Goeritz, A.
• Personality Assessment via Internet: Comparing Online and Paper-and-Pencil Questionnaires; 2002; Hertel, G., Naumann, S., Konradt, U., Batinic, B.
• Context Effects in Web-Surveys; 2002; Reips, U. -D.
• Theory and techniques of conducting Web experiments; 2002; Reips, U. -D.
• Privacy Perceptions and Online Practices; 2002; Viseu, A., Clement, A., Aspinall, J.
• Are refusing particpants different or what influence do have forced-choice-items on drop-out?; 2002; Voracek, M., Ponocny, I., Stieger, S.
• Online- and Touchscreensurveys: on Some Similarities of Computer-based Forms of Data Collection; 2002; Weichbold, M., Griessner, E. M.
• The Networked Nature of Community Online and Offline; 2002; Wellman, B., Boase, J., Chen, W.
• The Influence of Words, Symbols, Numbers, and Graphics on Answers to Self-Administered Questionnaires...; 2002; Dillman, D. A., Christian, L. M.
• Online Research Methodology: Reflections and Speculations; 2002; Sheehan, K. B.
• Characteristics of Respondents to a Web Survey of the General Public; 2002; Tarnai, J., Thom, A.
• Web-based Survey versus Conventional Survey. The Malaysian Experience in Conducting the Internet Subscriber...; 2002; Asha, R. P.
• Beyond Usability: Using the ''Webpage Interview'' to Explore Literary Practices; 2002; Attar, D.
• Internet Surveys: How Can they Contribute to Improve Traditional Survey Data and Administrative Databases...; 2002; Biffignandi, S., Pratesi, M.
• Web Fragmentation: A Network Analysis Approach; 2002; Koren, G., Kovacic, M., Batagelj, Z.
• Alternative Approaches to Measure Web Site Audiences; 2002; Robinsak, M., Batagelj, Z.
• Collaborative Approach to Web Access Analysis; 2002; Grobelnik, M., Mladenic, D.
• The implementation of an electronic survey tool to help determine the information needs of a knowledge...; 2002; Foo, S., Hepworth, M.
• Interpreting the new online advertising effectiveness measures. How new online brand effectiveness measures...; 2002; Hughes, G.
• Cross-media measurement. The new medium necessitates a new approach to an old problem; 2002; Briggs, R.
• Internet inclusive multi-media reach/frequency and optimization. Theories and techniques for an evolving...; 2002; Collins, J. H., Mallett, D. T.
• Forecasting reach, frequency and GRPs on the Internet; 2002; Chandler -Pepelnjak, J.
• The reach and frequency approach to advertising planning on the Internet; 2002; Coffey, S., Mazumdar, M.
• Online research alternatives. Choices, choices, but which one is best for me?; 2002; Klein, C., Lonnie, K.
• User-centric Internet measurement and its role in media planning; 2002; O’Connell, F.
• Site-centric measurement. Can traditional panels meet the new standard?; 2002; FitzGerald, J.
• Monitoring Internet audience measurement panels. Methodological issues and market trends; 2002; Haering, H.
• Computing unique user counts from server log files. Comparative analysis of varying methods; 2002; Bennett, R. P., Hanson, S. J., Guenther, S. A., Stone, M.
• Beyond demographic variables: Using psychographic research to narrate the story of Internet users; 2002; Dutta -Bergman, M. J.
• Virtual Selves and Web Surveys; 2002; Lozar Manfreda, K., Couper, M. P., Vohar, M., Rivas, S., Vehovar, V.
• Do Mail and Web Surveys Provide Same Results?; 2002; Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.

Page:

• 1
...
• 99
• 100
• 101
...
• 128