Web Survey Bibliography - 2001 (349)

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7

• Visual Analog Scales: Do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states?; 2001; Torrance, G. W., Feeny, D., Furlong, W.
• Trends in household survey nonresponse: A longitudinal and international comparison; 2001; de Leeuw, E. D., de Heer, W.
• The construction of attitudes; 2001; Schwarz, N., Bohnerd, G.
• Subscale distance and item clustering effects in self-administered surveys: A new metric; 2001; Bradlow, E. T., Fitzsimons, G. J.
• Sociability and usability in online communities: determining and measuring success; 2001; Preece, J.
• On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second‐order meta&#...; 2001; Peterson, R. A.
• Introduction to behavioral research on the internet; 2001; Birnbaum, M. H.
• Improving the measurement of quality of life in older people: the York SF-12; 2001; Iglesias, C. P., Birks, Y. F., Torgerson, D. J.
• Experiments on column width spacing in the University of Michigan Student Life Survey; 2001; Boyd, C. J., McCabe, S. E., Couper, M. P., Crawford, S. D.
• Building an alternative response process model for business surveys; 2001; Willimack, D. K., Nichols, E. M.
• Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung; 2001; Dzeyk, W.
• Panel Bias from Attrition and Conditioning: A Case Study of the Knowledge Networks Panel; 2001; Clinton, J. D.
• Standards for Quality Assurance for Online Surveys; 2001
• Differential effects of Ecstasy and cannabis on self-reports of memory ability: a web-based study; 2001; Rodgers, J., Buchanan, T., Scholey, A. B., Heffernan, T. M., Ling, J., Parrott, A. C.
• Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities; 2001; Eysenbach, G., Till, E. J.
• Web experiment on colour harmony principles applied to computer user interface design; 2001; Laugwitz, B.
• Knowledge acquisition, navigation and eye movements from text and hypertext; 2001; Naumann, A., Waniek, J., Krems, J. F.
• CGI versus JavaScript: A Web experiment on the reversed hindsight bias; 2001; Schwarz, S., Reips, U. -D.
• Stimulus delivery on the Web: What can be presented when calibration isn t possible; 2001; Krantz, J. H.
• Score Reliability in Webor Internet-Based Surveys: Unnumbered Graphic Rating Scales versus Likert-Type...; 2001; Cook, C., Heath, F., Thompson, R. L., Thompson, B.
• Lessons Learned from the Administration of a Web-Based Survey; 2001; Mertler, C. A.
• A Comparison of Web-based and Paper-and-Pencil Library Satisfaction Survey Results; 2001; Perkins, G. H., Yuan, H.
• A Comparison of the Random Digit Dialing Telephone Survey Methodology with Internet Survey Methodology...; 2001; Chang, L. C., Krosnick, J. A.
• On-line student feedback: A pilot study ; 2001; Galbraith, L. B., Gee, P., Jennings, F., Riley, R.
• Comparing Two Survey Research Approaches: E-Mail and Web-Based Technology versus Traditional Mail ; 2001; Howes, C. M., Mailloux, M. R.
• Population Censuses on the Internet; 2001; Haug, W.
• Internet Surveys - Potentials for Use in Scientific Research; 2001; Galesic, M.
• Comparing social desirability responding on world wide web and paper-administered surveys; 2001; Hancock, D. R., Flowers, C. P.
• Facilitating research; 2001; Eysenbach, G., Wyatt, J. C.
• Metaevaluation of the Web-Based ATE Survey Evaluation System; 2001; Hartmann, D., Loizides, G.
• Online Data Collection With Special Populations Over the World Wide Web; 2001; Marcell, M. M., Falls, A. L.
• Trials and Tribulations: Conducting an Online, Web-based Survey; 2001; Jankowski, N. W., Van Selm, M.
• Reliability And Comparability Of Choice-Based Measures: Online and Paper-and-Pencil Methods of Administration...; 2001; Miller, T. W., Rake, D., Sumimoto, T., Hollman, P. S.
• Experimental analysis of survey response bias over the internet: Some results from the Retirement Perspectives...; 2001; McFadden, D., Winter, J.
• Retaining Virtue in a Virtual World: E-surveys in Public Policy Research; 2001; Mallett, T.
• Literature Review of Web and E-mail Surveys, Chapter III; 2001; Schonlau, M., Fricker, R. D., Elliot, M. N.
• Comparing Two Survey Approaches: Web and Traditional Mail; 2001; Howes, C. M., Mailloux, M. R.
• Weighting for nontelephone households in RDD surveys; 2001; Ferraro, D., Brick, J. M.
• A Comparison Of Electronic Surveying By E-Mail And Web; 2001; Brawner, C. E., Felder, R. M., Allen, R. H., Brent, R., Miller, T. K.
• Satisfaction Survey by Web or by Paper? A Case Study; 2001; Laughlin, B.
• Response Rates in Internet Surveys – Experiences from an Online Expert Survey into WAP for business...; 2001; Marcussen, C. H.
• Investigating Validity in Web Surveys; 2001; Satmetrix Systems
• The Usage of the Email Message/Internet Surveys Compared With Other Methods of Collecting Data; 2001; Thistlethwaite, P. C., Luker, K., Ransdell, T.
• Knowing Me, Knowing You: Reciprocal Self-Disclosure in Internet-Based Surveys; 2001; Joinson, A. N.
• Two online surveys of Italian Internet audiences: a summary of findings; 2001; Magistretti, S.
• Advertising research in the 21st century. A new method for the Internet age; 2001; Hollier, E. A., Remington, K. C.
• The quality of online panels. A methodological test; 2001; Hoppe, M., Lamp, R.
• Efficiency vs. effectiveness in Online research; 2001; Poulsen, C. S.
• Mixing research techniques for a mixed economy; 2001; Twyman, T., Mundy, C.
• Four week radio survey. Evaluating models for extended reach and frequency; 2001; Lyall, A., Neely, M., Rungie, C. M.

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7