Web Survey Bibliography
Title CATI in an Agricultural Statistical Agency
Author Tortora, R. D.
Source Journal of Official Statistics, 1, 3, pp. 301-314
Access date 20.12.2004
Full text pdf (1623k)
Abstract Computer assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) is a new data collection procedure that is under development, evaluation and use in several survey research organizations. Many private survey organizations (Shanks (1983)) have developed CATI systems. In the U.S. some of the major federal statistical agencies are developing, testing and implementing CATI. This paper describes the Statistical Reporting Service's CATI system, summarizes a comparison of CATI and conventional telephone data collection, discusses the impact of CATI on interviewers and outlines the implementation plan for CATI in the Statistical Reporting Service.
Access/Direct link Homepage - journal (full text)
Year of publication1981-1985
Bibliographic typeJournal article
Web Survey Bibliography - 1981-1985 (12)
- CATI in an Agricultural Statistical Agency; 1985; Tortora, R. D.
- Questionnaire Design with Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing; 1985; House, C. C.
- From intentions to actions: A theroy of planned behavior; 1985; Ajzen, I.
- Cognitive science and survey methods; 1984; Tourangeau, R.
- Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score; 1984; Rosenbaum, P. R., Rubin, D. B.
- Category ratings and the relational character of judgment; 1983; Parducci, A.
- Implications of CATI: Costs, Errors, and Organization of Telephone Survey Research; 1983; Groves, R. M.
- Research Opportunities Related to CATI; 1983; Freeman, H.E.
- Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design; 1982; Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M.
- Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states; 1982; Torrance, G. W., Boyle, M. H., Horwood, S. P.
- Question & answers in attitude surveys. Experiment of question form, wording, and context; 1981; Schuman, H., Presser, S.
- Label versus position in rating scales; 1981; Friedman, H., Leefer R., J.