Web survey bibliography (8390)

Page:

• 1
• 2
...
• 168

• Displaying Videos in Web Surveys: Implications for Complete Viewing and Survey Responses; 2017; Mendelson, J.; Lee Gibson, J.; Romano Bergstrom, J. C.
• Using experts’ consensus (the Delphi method) to evaluate weighting techniques in web surveys not...; 2017; Toepoel, V.; Emerson, H.
• Mind the Mode: Differences in Paper vs. Web-Based Survey Modes Among Women With Cancer; 2017; Hagan, T. L.; Belcher, S. M.; Donovan, H. S.
• Answering Without Reading: IMCs and Strong Satisficing in Online Surveys; 2017; Anduiza, E.; Galais, C.
• Ideal and maximum length for a web survey; 2017; Revilla, M.; Ochoa, C.
• Social desirability bias in self-reported well-being measures: evidence from an online survey; 2017; Caputo, A.
• Web-Based Survey Methodology; 2017; Wright, K. B.
• Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences; 2017; Liamputtong, P.
• Lessons from recruitment to an internet based survey for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: merits of...; 2017; Davies, B.; Kotter, M. R.
• Web Survey Gamification - Increasing Data Quality in Web Surveys by Using Game Design Elements; 2017; Schacht, S.; Keusch, F.; Bergmann, N.; Morana, S.
• Effects of sampling procedure on data quality in a web survey; 2017; Rimac, I.; Ogresta, J.
• Comparability of web and telephone surveys for the measurement of subjective well-being; 2017; Sarracino, F.; Riillo, C. F. A.; Mikucka, M.
• Achieving Strong Privacy in Online Survey; 2017; Zhou, Yo.; Zhou, Yi.; Chen, S.; Wu, S. S.
• A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Incentives on Response Rate in Online Survey Studies; 2017; Mohammad Asire, A.
• Telephone versus Online Survey Modes for Election Studies: Comparing Canadian Public Opinion and Vote...; 2017; Breton, C.; Cutler, F.; Lachance, S.; Mierke-Zatwarnicki, A.
• Text message link to online survey: a new highly effective method of longitudinal data collection; 2017; Soon, R.; Salcedo, J.; Kaneshiro, B.
• Examining Factors Impacting Online Survey Response Ratesin Educational Research: Perceptions of Graduate...; 2017; Saleh, A.; Bista, K.
• Usability Testing for Survey Research; 2017; Geisen, E.; Romano Bergstrom, J. C.
• Paradata as an aide to questionnaire design: Improving quality and reducing burden; 2017; Timm, E.; Stewart, J.; Sidney, I.
• Fieldwork monitoring and managing with time-related paradata; 2017; Vandenplas, C.
• Interviewer effects on onliner and offliner participation in the German Internet Panel; 2017; Herzing, J. M. E.; Blom, A. G.; Meuleman, B.
• Interviewer Gender and Survey Responses: The Effects of Humanizing Cues Variations; 2017; Jablonski, W.; Krzewinska, A.; Grzeszkiewicz-Radulska, K.
• Millennials and emojis in Spain and Mexico.; 2017; Bosch Jover, O.; Revilla, M.
• Where, When, How and with What Do Panel Interviews Take Place and Is the Quality of Answers Affected...; 2017; Niebruegge, S.
• Comparing the same Questionnaire between five Online Panels: A Study of the Effect of Recruitment Strategy...; 2017; Schnell, R.; Panreck, L.
• Who fails and who passes instructed response item attention checks in web surveys?; 2017; Gummer, T.; Rossman, J.; Silber, H.
• Nonresponses as context-sensitive response behaviour of participants in online-surveys and their relevance...; 2017; Wetzlehuetter, D.
• Do distractions during web survey completion affect data quality? Findings from a laboratory experiment...; 2017; Wenz, A.
• Predicting Breakoffs in Web Surveys; 2017; Mittereder, F.; West, B. T.
• Measuring Subjective Health and Life Satisfaction with U.S. Hispanics; 2017; Lee, S.; Davis, R.
• Humanizing Cues in Internet Surveys: Investigating Respondent Cognitive Processes; 2017; Jablonski, W.; Grzeszkiewicz-Radulska, K.; Krzewinska, A.
• A Comparison of Emerging Pretesting Methods for Evaluating “Modern” Surveys; 2017; Geisen, E., Murphy, J.
• The Effect of Respondent Commitment on Response Quality in Two Online Surveys; 2017; Cibelli Hibben, K.
• How to encourage people to complete online surveys when using a different contact mode? A summary and...; 2017; Nicolaas, G.; Smith, Pa.
• Pushing from telephone to web: a low-cost and effective way to conduct national election studies; 2017; Kartsounidou, E.; Andreadis, I.
• Address-based Online Surveying (ABOS): The impact of design features on response ; 2017; Fitzpatrick, A.; Williams, Jo.
• Notes from a Push2web(+mail) survey: the ISSP 2014 Citizenship survey in Spain; 2017; Mendez, M.
• Pushing to web in the ISSP; 2017; Jonsdottir, G. A.; Dofradottir, A. G.; Einarsson, H. B.
• The 2016 Canadian Census: An Innovative Wave Collection Methodology to Maximize Self-Response and Internet...; 2017; Mathieu, P.
• Quantitative testing of the most effective advance communication strategies for a mixed mode (including...; 2017; Phelps, A.
• Transformed respondent engagement strategy; an overview of the research at ONS to develop respondent...; 2017; Wilson, L.; Nickson, S.
• Push2web or less is more? Experimental evidence from a mixed-mode population survey at the community...; 2017; Neumann, R.; Haeder, M.; Brust, O.; Dittrich, E.; von Hermanni, H.
• The worldwide increase in use of web-push methods that start with a mail contact; what have we learned...; 2017; Dillman, D. A.
• In search of best practices; 2017; Kappelhof, J. W. S.; Steijn, S.
• Redirected Inbound Call Sampling (RICS); A New Methodology ; 2017; Krotki, K.; Bobashev, G.; Levine, B.; Richards, S.
• An Empirical Process for Using Non-probability Survey for Inference; 2017; Tortora, R.; Iachan, R.
• The perils of non-probability sampling; 2017; Bethlehem, J.
• A Comparison of Two Nonprobability Samples with Probability Samples; 2017; Zack, E. S.; Kennedy, J. M.
• A bootstrap method for estimating the sampling variation in point estimates from quota samples; 2017; Kuha, J.; Sturgis, P.
• Investigation into the use of weighting adjustments for non-probability online panel samples; 2017; Neiger, D.; Pennay, D. W.; Ward, A. C.; Lavrakas, P. J.

Page:

• 1
• 2
...
• 168