Web Survey Bibliography
Title Datacollection and Datahandling with the crosssite Sample of the OnSite-Survey in the AGOF Project "die internet facts"
Author Lipsmeier, G.
Year 2005
Access date 30.03.2005
Abstract This contribution will detail some aspects of the OnSite-Survey (denominated as pillar II in the AGOF Project). Besides the quite large number of participating websites one unique feature of this survey is the sampling and recruiting procedure of many internet users across the participating sites and contolling reinvitations depending on the result of prior invitations. To realize this ambitious project random samples of so called idents are drawn from the population generated by the audience measurement system of the IVW and stored at a central location. Idents that are in the active sample will be invited to the survey by a recruiting ad adopted to the layout of the website they surf to and will thereafter be blocked from receiving further invitations. The blocking will be released for subsequent invitations subject to well defined rules based on a concurrent tracking of the results that prior survey invitations achieved (i.e. completed the survey, more than one user of the computer etc.). The operations necessary to achieve this (i.e. secure communication with the central sampling system of Spring GmbH) will be explained and spelled out in some detail. The focus is on the passing of parameters from the sample, the handling of reinvitations across all participating sites, the sitespecific layout of the questionnaire and the handling of automatically controlled followup surveys.
Abstract - optional Im Beitrag wird die als Säule II bezeichnete OnSite-Befragung dargestellt. Das Besondere dieser Online-Umfrage ist neben der Anzahl der beteiligten Sites die siteübergreifende Rekrutierung und Einladung einer großen Zahl zu befragender Internetnutzer sowie die ergebnisabhängige Aussteuerung der Einladungen. Zur Realisierung dieses anspruchsvollen Projektes werden auf der Basis der IVW-Reichweitenmessung Zufallsstichproben sogenannter Idents gezogen und an einer zentralen Stelle hinterlegt. In der Stichprobe aktive Idents erhalten eine an das jeweilige Website-Layout angepasste Befragungseinladung und werden danach für weitere Einladungen gesperrt. Eine Freischaltung zu einer erneuten Einladung erfolgt auf der Basis des genauen Trackings aller Einladungen nach festgelegten Regeln in Abhängigkeit von den Ergebnissen der Befragungsversuche (u.a. teilgenommen, mehr als ein Nutzer des Rechners etc.). Die hierzu erforderlichen Operationen (u.a. sichere Kommunikation mit dem zentralen Stichprobensystem der Spring GmbH) werden beschrieben und einzeln erläutert. Die Übergabe von Parametern aus der Stichprobe, das Handling von Wiedervorlagen innerhalb aller beteiligten Sites, das sitespezifische Layout des Fragebogens, sowie das Handling von automatisiert gesteuerten Nachbefragungen stehen im Mittelpunkt.
Access/Direct link Homepage - conference - (abstract)
Year of publication2005
Bibliographic typeConferences, workshops, tutorials, presentations
Web Survey Bibliography (6359)
- Effects of Lotteries on Response Behavior in Online Panels; 2013; Goeritz, A., Luthe, S. C.
- Lotteries and study results in market research online panels; 2013; Goeritz, A., Luthe, S. C.
- The Effects of Errors in Paradata on Weighting Class Adjustments: A Simulation Study; 2013; West, B. T.
- Using Paradata to Study Response to Within-Survey Requests; 2013; Sakshaug, J. W.
- Paradata for Coverage Research ; 2013; Eckman, S.
- Improving Surveys with Paradata: Analytic Uses of Process Information; 2013; Kreuter, F.
- Theory of adaptation or survival of the fittest?; 2013; Cavallaro, K.
- Online Fundraising Essentials, Second Edition; 2013; Stevenson, S. C.
- Tips for Evaluating Online Effectiveness; 2013; Stevenson, S. C.
- The Digital Divide: The internet and social inequality in international perspective; 2013; Ragnedda, M., Muschert, G.
- Ten questions to ask your online survey provider; 2013; Williams, D.
- Survey quality prediction system 2.0; 2013
- Practical tools for designing and weighting survey samples; 2013; Valliant, R. L., Daver, J. A., Kreuter, F.
- Paradata in web surveys; 2013; Callegaro, M.
- Report Of The AAPOR Task Force On Non-probability sampling; 2013; Baker, R. P., Brick, J. M., Bates, N., Battaglia, M. P., Couper, M. P., Dever, J. A., Gile, K. J., Tourangeau...
- Incentive effects; 2013; Goeritz, A.
- A nationwide web-based freight data collection; 2013; Samimi, A., Mohammadian, A., Kawamura, K.
- Mode Matters: Evaluating Response Comparability in a Mixed-Mode Survey; 2013; Bowyer, B. T., Rogowski, J. C.
- Comparing Survey Results Obtained via Mobile Devices and Computers: An Experiment With a Mobile Web...; 2013; de Bruijne, M., Wijnant, A.
- Cognitive Probes in Web Surveys: On the Effect of Different Text Box Size and Probing Exposure on Response...; 2013; Behr, D., Bandilla, W., Kaczmirek, L., Braun, M.
- The E-Interview in Qualitative Research; 2013; Bampton, R., Cowton, C., Downs, Y.
- Methodological Considerations of Qualitative Email Interviews; 2013; Nehls, K.
- Best Practice in Online Survey Research with Sensitive Topics; 2013; Kays, K., Keith, T. L., Broughal, M. T.
- Research Intentions are Nothing without Technology: Mixed-Method Web Surveys and the Coberen Wall of...; 2013; Ganassali, S., Rodriguez-Santos, C.
- Reducing Response Burden for Enterprises Combining Methods for Data Collection on the Internet; 2013; Vik, T.
- Measuring Wages Worldwide: Exploring the Potentials and Constraints of Volunteer Web Surveys; 2013; Steinmetz, S., Raess, D., Tijdens, K., de Pedraza, P.
- Using Web Surveys for Psychology Experiments: A Case Study in New Media Technology for Research; 2013; Peden, B. F., Tiry , A. M.
- The Distinctiveness of Online Research: Descriptive Assemblages, Unobtrusiveness, and Novel Kinds of...; 2013; Lanfrey, D.
- Sampling, Channels, and Contact Strategies in Internet Survey; 2013; Macrì, E., Tessitore, C.
- Advancing Research Methods with New Technologies; 2013; Sappleton, N.
- Data Quality in PC and Mobile Web Surveys; 2013; Mavletova, A. M.
- PDAs in socio-economic surveys: instrument bias, surveyor bias or both?; 2013; Escobal, J., Benites, S.
- Virtual research assistants: Replacing human interviewers by automated avatars in virtual worlds; 2013; Hasler, B. S., Tuchman, P., Friedman, D.
- Compared to a small, supervised lab experiment, a large, unsupervised web-based experiment on a previously...; 2013; Ryan, R. S., Wilde, M., Crist, S.
- From mixed-mode to multiple devices. Web surveys, smartphone surveys and apps: has the respondent gone...; 2013; Callegaro, M.
- Moving an established survey online – or not?; 2013; Barber, T., Chilvers, D., Kaul, S.
- Using mobile devices to access the realities of youth: How identification with society influences political...; 2013; Smith, M.
- On the Use of Latent Variable Models to Detect Differences in the Interpretation of Vague Quantifiers...; 2013; Griffin, J.
- Managing mobile research: How it's different and why it matters; 2013; Kachhi-Jiwani, D., Tucker, J., Wilding-Brown, L.
- An approach to selecting online respondents; 2013; Terhanian, G.
- By the Numbers: Theory of adaptation or survival of the fittest?; 2013; Cavallaro, K.
- Designing and conducting business surveys; 2013; Snijkers, G.,Araldsen, G., , Willimack, D. K.Jones, J.
- Battle of the Scales: Understanding Respondent Scale Usage in the US and Abroad; 2013; Courtright, M., Pashupati, K., Pettit, F. A.
- Modular Survey Design: A Bite Size Proposal; 2013; Kelly, F., Stevens, S., Johnson, A.
- Cyborgs vs. Monsters: Assembling Modular Surveys to Create Complete Datasets; 2013; Johnson, E. P., Siluk, L., Tarraf, S.
- Do I Have Your Full Attention?; 2013; Cape, P. J.
- Does Sample Size Still Matter?; 2013; Bakken, D. G., Bond, M.
- Optimizing Surveys for Smartphones: Maximizing Response Rates While Minimizing Bias; 2013; Lattery, K., Park Bartolone, G., Saunders, T.
- Shorter Isn't Always Better; 2013; Burdein, I.
- Solving the Unintentional Mobile Challenge; 2013; Peterson, G., Mechling, J., LaFrance, J., Ham, G.