Web Survey Bibliography - 2005 (417)

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9

• Web Survey Methodologies: A Comparison of Survey Accuracy; 2005; Krosnick, J. A., Nie, N., Rivers, D.
• Non-interviews in Mobile Phone Surveys; 2005; Vehovar, V.
• Quality Assessed: Cellular Phone Surveys versus Traditional Telephone Surveys; 2005; Steeh, C. G.
• Testing the Impact of Caller ID Technology on Response Rates in a Mixed Mode Survey; 2005; Trussell, N., Lavrakas, P. J.
• Re-examining Approaches to Achieving High Response Rates on Web-based Surveys of Post-secondary Students...; 2005; Lodato, B. N., Ghadialy, R.
• Qualitative Comparison of Paper and Online Self-Administered Modes; 2005; Grigorian, K. H., Sederstrom, S.
• Evaluating Nonsampling Errors in a Study Comparing Data Collected by Mail and Using the Web; 2005; Lesser, V. M., Newton, L.
• Effectiveness of E-mail and Paper Mail Notifications for Internet Surveys; 2005; Ruggiere, P., Ver Duin, D'Arlene
• Transforming a Paper Survey into a Web-based Survey: Respondent Experiences; 2005; Luyegu, A.
• A Profile of Self-Selecting Web Respondents; 2005; Guerino, P.
• What's Up Doc? Mixing Web and Mail Methods in a Survey of Physicians; 2005; Beebe, T. J., Locke, G. R., Barnes, S. A.
• Predicting Smapled Respondents' Likelihood to Cooperate in a Mail Survey: Part III; 2005; Burks, A. T., Lavrakas, P. J., Bennett, M.
• Sound Bytes: Capturing Audio in Survey Interviews; 2005; Hansen, S. E., Krysan, M., Couper, M. P.
• (Inter) Net Gain? Experiments to Increase Web-Based Response; 2005; Tourkin, S., Cox, S., Parmer, R., Zukerberg, A.
• Does Type of Pre-Notification Affect Web Survey Response Rates?; 2005; Harmon, M., Westin, E., Levin, K.
• Did You Get The Message? Using E-Mail and SMS for Prenotification in Web Surveys; 2005; Neubarth, W., Bosnjak, M., Bandilla, W., Couper, M. P., Kaczmirek, L.
• Analysis of Break-off Patterns in Web Surveys; 2005; Ahsan, S., Broach, R. J.
• The Effect of Incentives on Two Physician Mail Surveys: A Response Rate Comparison; 2005; Christian, J.
• Value and Timing Strategies in Prize Draws: A Further Examination of the Immediacy Effect in Web Surveys...; 2005; Tuten, T. L., Galesic, M., Bosnjak, M.
• Comparative Analyses of Parallel Paper, Phone, and Web Surveys With and Without Incentives: What Differences...; 2005; Olsen, D., Call, V., Wygant, S.
• Characteristics Related to Cell Phone Status: Why Generation Y Should be Targeted; 2005; Hancock, L.
• The Labelling Game: A Conceptual Exploration of Deviance on the Internet; 2005; Denegri-Knott, J., Taylor, J.
• Mode Effects for Hybrid Telephone/Internet Surveys and Reaching Cellphone-Only Households; 2005; Kulp, D., Herrmann, M., Dutwin, D., Lavine, S.
• In Search of Equivalency across Modes: Experimental Results Comparing Alternative Question Formats for...; 2005; Christian, L. M., Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D.
• Survey Mode Effects: Comparison between Telephone and Web; 2005; Speizer, H., Baker, R. P., Schneider, K.
• How Does Social Desirability Affect Responses?: Differences in Telephone and Online Surveys; 2005; Taylor, H., Krane, D., Thomas, R. K.
• Young Cell Phone Users and Voting Behavior in Georgia in 2004; 2005; Bason, J. J.
• Comparing Check-All and Forced-Choice Question Formats in Web Surveys: The Role of Satisficing, Depth...; 2005; Smyth, J. D., Dillman, D. A., Christian, L. M., Stern, M. J.Chou, C.; de Rouvray, C.Christianson DeMay...
• Improving Web Based Intercept Surveys: A Framework For The Active User Sampling; 2005; Kaczmirek, L., Neubarth, W.
• Comparing the Knowledge Networks Web-Enabled Panel and the In-Person 2002 General Social Survey: Experiments...; 2005; Smith, T. W., Li, R. J., Pulliam, P.
• Data Collection Mode Effects Controlling for Sample Origins in a Panel Study: Telephone versus Internet...; 2005; Dennis, J. M., Chatt, C.Li, R. J.; de Rouvray, C.Pulliam, P.; de Rouvray, C.
• Translucent is the mind of the web user; 2005; Britschgi, M.
• Comparing response distributions of offline and online data collection methods; 2005; Schillewaert, N., Meulemeester, P.
• Online focus groups; 2005; Reid, D. J., Reid, F. J. M.
• A Typology of Real-Time Validations in Web-Based Surveys; 2005; Peytchev, A., Crawford, S. D.
• Pediatric Gastroenterology Workforce Survey, 2003-2004; 2005; Crandall, W., Barnard, J., Cohen, M., Colletti, R., Ferry, G., Harnsberger, J., Hart, M., Rosenthal,...
• Interaction in cyberspace: an online focus group; 2005; Kenny, A. J.
• The value of online surveys; 2005; Evans, J. R., Mathur, A.
• Improving Customer Experience via Text Mining; 2005; Lakshminarayan, C., Yu, Q., Benson, A.
• An Empirical Evaluation of Three Web Survey Design Principles; 2005; Healey, B., MacPherson, T., Kuijten, B.
• In my opinion; 2005; Haley, F.
• Studying marriage and family therapists in the 21st century: Methodological and technological issues; 2005; Northey, N. F. Jr.
• Online has all the answers; 2005; Buxton, P.
• Survey Says...Or Does It? Fun with Statistics; 2005; Crawford, W.
• Websurveyor debuts free web polling tool; 2005; Anonymous
• FIRM: FIRM to release a free and easy-to-use questionnaire designer; 2005; Anonymous
• Online Data Collection: Strategies for Research; 2005; Granello, D. H., Wheaton, J. E.
• Eight tips offer best practices for online MR; 2005; Kottler, R. E.
• Get the most from Net-based panel research; 2005; Philpott, G.
• Evaluation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Young People Using a Web-Based Survey Technique.; 2005; Chung, J. H., des Roches, C. M., Meunier, J., Eavey, R. D.

Page:

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9