Web Survey Bibliography
A paper self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) can be a reliable and cost-effective approach to data collection. For the last few decades, the Total Design Method developed by Dillman has been the gold standard for effectively and efficiently collecting survey data. However, relatively low cost and ongoing improvements in Internet accessibility seem to be driving researchers to include self-administered online surveys conducted over the Internet (Web) as a data collection option. In many ways, SAQ and Web surveys are very similar. Each selfadministered mode allows respondents to answer privately and at their own pace, which Bishop (1988) suggests provides better quality data than interviewer-administered surveys. Further, a respondent's ability to comprehend both question text and response options is more similar in the SAQ and Web survey modes, than the interviewer administered mode. But these two self-administered modes are inherently different. In order to determine the effect of self-administered mode on data quality, this paper will make a qualitative comparison of data collected in the SAQ and Web modes in the 2003 Survey of Doctorate Recipients. The SDR is a panel survey administered biennially to a national sample of 40,000 doctorate-holders in the fields of science and engineering; the Web survey option was introduced in the 2003 round. More specifically, we will compare the data quality of 18,040 complete SAQs and 6,179 compete Web surveys. Additionally, we will compare the data quality between rounds for 3,580 sample members who completed a SAQ in the 2001 SDR and a Web survey in the 2003 SDR. Quantitative data evaluations will compare the amount of data editing required, overall item non-response, the amount of contacting information provided, and length of the key analytic verbatim data item.
Web Survey Bibliography - 2005 (418)
- Web-Enabled Coding Procedures in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health; 2005; Handley, W.
- Examining the Effectiveness of Telephone Promoting in Increasing Self-Administered Web Participation; 2005; Franklin, J.
- Prompting Efforts to Raise Response Rates for a Web-Based Survey; 2005; Parker, M.
- The Effectiveness of E-mail in Obtaining Respondednts for Web-based Surveys; 2005; Jewell, D.
- Conducting the 2004 NKDEP (National Kidney Disease Education Program) Follow-Up Study: Lessons in a...; 2005; Bason, J. J.
- A Survey of Teachers: Comparing Web and Mail Survey Modes; 2005; Baldwin, M.
- Comparison of Web-Based & In-Person Survey Modes with 18 Year Olds; 2005; Muljat, A.
- Web Based CATI Case Management System; 2005; Suresh, R.
- Administering Surveys on the Internet; 2005; Best, S. J.
- Biases in internet sexual health samples: Comparison of an internet sexuality survey and a national...; 2005; Ross, M. W., Mansson, S.-A., Daneback, K., Cooper, A., Tikkanen, R.
- Survey Quality and Mobile Phones; 2005; Kuusela, V., Notkola, V.
- Estimating the Working Number Rate for a Cellular Telephone Survey; 2005; Steeh, C. G., Hu, Z.
- Mobile self-interviewing: an opportunity for location-based marked research; 2005; Tjostheim, I.
- Bleeding Edge or Proven Technology? The Fact and the Fiction of Mobile Survey Computing; 2005; Cameron, M. R.
- Internet Survey Developments At Statistics Netherlands; 2005; Bethlehem, J.
- A Web-based Survey Creator; 2005; Payne, B., Crawford, E.
- A Comparison of Nonresponse Adjustment Methods with the Case Study of HIES; 2005; Yeanok, Y., Semi, K.
- Compilation of Composite Satisfaction Index in User Satisfaction Survey; 2005; Sam Min, K., Park, J.
- Major issues for improving the web-based data collection system; 2005; Jeon, J.
- Survey Automation through ActiveX components and XML Web Services; 2005; Segui, F.
- The Dutch Virtual Census of 2001; 2005; Nordholt, E. S.
- CAPI at MORI - A decade of mobile interviewing; 2005; Johnson, A. J.
- Developing a Mobile Transportation Survey System; 2005; Bates, I., Ramsey, B.
- Using Behaviour Coding to Analyze Interviewer/Respondent Interactions with a Mobile Computing Device; 2005; Hunter, J. E., Landreth, A.
- The Market Value Survey: Ensuring Quality on a Government Web Based Survey; 2005; Flatley, J., Ruston, D.
- A Comparison of an Online Card Sorting Task to a Rating Task; 2005; Thomas, R. K., Bayer, L. R., Johnson, A. M., Behnke, C. S.
- Unintended Consequences of Incentive Induced Response Rate Differences; 2005; Pope, D., Crawford, S. D., Johnson, E. O., McCabe, S. E.
- The Use of Monetary Incentives in the Survey of Income and Program Participation; 2005; Lewis, D., Creighton, K.
- A Comparison of Presidential Candidate Vote Intention Measures in U.S. Elections; 2005; Thomas, R. K., Krane, D., Sanders, M. G., Behnke, C. S.
- An Investigation of Response Difference between Cell Phone and Landline Interviews; 2005; Dipko, S., Brick, P. D., Brick, J. M., Presser, S.
- Mode Effects in Customer Satisfaction Measurement; 2005; Stegier, D.M., Keil, L., Gaertner, G.
- Prompting Efforts to Raise Response Rates for a Web-Based Survey; 2005; Venkataraman, L., Parker, M.
- From Crayons to Computers: The Evolution of Computer use in Redistricting; 2005; Altman, M., MacDonald, K., McDonald, M. P.
- Survey Measures of Web-Oriented Digital Literacy; 2005; Hargittai, E.
- Vote Over-Reporting: Testing the Social Desirability Hypothesis in Telephone and Internet Surveys; 2005; Holbrook, A. L., Krosnick, J. A.
- The Impact of Follow-up Contacts od Survey Data and Response Rates; 2005; Westin, E., Harmon, M., Levin, K.
- Mixed Mode Data Collection Using Paper and Web Questionnaries. A Cost and Response Rate Comparison in...; 2005; Werner, P., Forsman, G.
- Are Web Options Making a Difference?; 2005; Mooney, G., Rogers, B., Wood, M., Trunzo, D.
- High Response Rate or Better Data Quality? Examining the Trade-offs for an Establishment Survey; 2005; Harris-Kojetin, L., Kiefer, K.
- To Vote or Not to Vote?: A Comparison of Vote Intention Measures; 2005; Thomas, R. K., Sanders, M. G., Smith, R., Behnke, C. S.
- Reporting Standards for Internet Surveys and Polls; 2005; Tychansky, R. S.
- Effect of Respondent Motivation and Tack Difficulty on Nondifferentiation in Ratings: A Test of Satisficing...; 2005; Anand, S., Krosnick, J. A., Mulligan, K., Smith, W., Green, M. C., Bizer, G. Y.
- Comparing Major Survey Firms in Terms of Survey Satisficing: Telephone and Internet Data Collection; 2005; Krosnick, J. A., Nie, N., Rivers, D.
- Response Order Effects in Online Surveys; 2005; Thomas, R. K., Behnke, C. S., Johnson, A. M.
- Causes of Context Effects: How Questionnaire Layout Induces Measurement Error; 2005; Peytchev, A., Tourangeau, R.
- Can You Hear Me Now?: Differences in Vote Behavior in the Cell and Landline Populations; 2005; Albaghal, T.
- Using the Web to Survey College Students: Institutional Characteristics That Influence Survey Quality...; 2005; Crawford, S. D., McCabe, S. E., Inkelas, K. K.
- What They See Is Not What We Intend-Gricean Effects in Web Surveys; 2005; Yan, T.
- Visual Context Effects in Web Surveys; 2005; Couper, M. P., Conrad, F. G., Tourangeau, R.
- Interactive Feedback Can Improve Quality of Responses in Web Surveys; 2005; Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., Galesic, M.

