Web Survey Bibliography
A paper self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) can be a reliable and cost-effective approach to data collection. For the last few decades, the Total Design Method developed by Dillman has been the gold standard for effectively and efficiently collecting survey data. However, relatively low cost and ongoing improvements in Internet accessibility seem to be driving researchers to include self-administered online surveys conducted over the Internet (Web) as a data collection option. In many ways, SAQ and Web surveys are very similar. Each selfadministered mode allows respondents to answer privately and at their own pace, which Bishop (1988) suggests provides better quality data than interviewer-administered surveys. Further, a respondent's ability to comprehend both question text and response options is more similar in the SAQ and Web survey modes, than the interviewer administered mode. But these two self-administered modes are inherently different. In order to determine the effect of self-administered mode on data quality, this paper will make a qualitative comparison of data collected in the SAQ and Web modes in the 2003 Survey of Doctorate Recipients. The SDR is a panel survey administered biennially to a national sample of 40,000 doctorate-holders in the fields of science and engineering; the Web survey option was introduced in the 2003 round. More specifically, we will compare the data quality of 18,040 complete SAQs and 6,179 compete Web surveys. Additionally, we will compare the data quality between rounds for 3,580 sample members who completed a SAQ in the 2001 SDR and a Web survey in the 2003 SDR. Quantitative data evaluations will compare the amount of data editing required, overall item non-response, the amount of contacting information provided, and length of the key analytic verbatim data item.
Web Survey Bibliography - The American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) 60th Annual Conference, 2005 (57)
- News Discrepancy and Information Search: The Effects of News Slants on Audiences' Information Search...; 2005; Hwang, H., Heo, K., Lee, S.-Y.
- The Market Value Survey: Ensuring Quality on a Government Web Based Survey; 2005; Flatley, J., Ruston, D.
- A Comparison of an Online Card Sorting Task to a Rating Task; 2005; Thomas, R. K., Bayer, L. R., Johnson, A. M., Behnke, C. S.
- Unintended Consequences of Incentive Induced Response Rate Differences; 2005; Pope, D., Crawford, S. D., Johnson, E. O., McCabe, S. E.
- The Use of Monetary Incentives in the Survey of Income and Program Participation; 2005; Lewis, D., Creighton, K.
- A Comparison of Presidential Candidate Vote Intention Measures in U.S. Elections; 2005; Thomas, R. K., Krane, D., Sanders, M. G., Behnke, C. S.
- An Investigation of Response Difference between Cell Phone and Landline Interviews; 2005; Dipko, S., Brick, P. D., Brick, J. M., Presser, S.
- Mode Effects in Customer Satisfaction Measurement; 2005; Stegier, D.M., Keil, L., Gaertner, G.
- Prompting Efforts to Raise Response Rates for a Web-Based Survey; 2005; Venkataraman, L., Parker, M.
- Vote Over-Reporting: Testing the Social Desirability Hypothesis in Telephone and Internet Surveys; 2005; Holbrook, A. L., Krosnick, J. A.
- The Impact of Follow-up Contacts od Survey Data and Response Rates; 2005; Westin, E., Harmon, M., Levin, K.
- Mixed Mode Data Collection Using Paper and Web Questionnaries. A Cost and Response Rate Comparison in...; 2005; Werner, P., Forsman, G.
- Are Web Options Making a Difference?; 2005; Mooney, G., Rogers, B., Wood, M., Trunzo, D.
- High Response Rate or Better Data Quality? Examining the Trade-offs for an Establishment Survey; 2005; Harris-Kojetin, L., Kiefer, K.
- To Vote or Not to Vote?: A Comparison of Vote Intention Measures; 2005; Thomas, R. K., Sanders, M. G., Smith, R., Behnke, C. S.
- Reporting Standards for Internet Surveys and Polls; 2005; Tychansky, R. S.
- Effect of Respondent Motivation and Tack Difficulty on Nondifferentiation in Ratings: A Test of Satisficing...; 2005; Anand, S., Krosnick, J. A., Mulligan, K., Smith, W., Green, M. C., Bizer, G. Y.
- Comparing Major Survey Firms in Terms of Survey Satisficing: Telephone and Internet Data Collection; 2005; Krosnick, J. A., Nie, N., Rivers, D.
- Response Order Effects in Online Surveys; 2005; Thomas, R. K., Behnke, C. S., Johnson, A. M.
- Causes of Context Effects: How Questionnaire Layout Induces Measurement Error; 2005; Peytchev, A., Tourangeau, R.
- Can You Hear Me Now?: Differences in Vote Behavior in the Cell and Landline Populations; 2005; Albaghal, T.
- Using the Web to Survey College Students: Institutional Characteristics That Influence Survey Quality...; 2005; Crawford, S. D., McCabe, S. E., Inkelas, K. K.
- What They See Is Not What We Intend-Gricean Effects in Web Surveys; 2005; Yan, T.
- Visual Context Effects in Web Surveys; 2005; Couper, M. P., Conrad, F. G., Tourangeau, R.
- Interactive Feedback Can Improve Quality of Responses in Web Surveys; 2005; Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., Galesic, M.
- Data Quality Issues in a Multimode Survey; 2005; Wilson, C., Wright, D., Barton, T., Guerino, P.
- Web Survey Methodologies: A Comparison of Survey Accuracy; 2005; Krosnick, J. A., Nie, N., Rivers, D.
- Non-interviews in Mobile Phone Surveys; 2005; Vehovar, V.
- Quality Assessed: Cellular Phone Surveys versus Traditional Telephone Surveys; 2005; Steeh, C. G.
- Testing the Impact of Caller ID Technology on Response Rates in a Mixed Mode Survey; 2005; Trussell, N., Lavrakas, P. J.
- Re-examining Approaches to Achieving High Response Rates on Web-based Surveys of Post-secondary Students...; 2005; Lodato, B. N., Ghadialy, R.
- Qualitative Comparison of Paper and Online Self-Administered Modes; 2005; Grigorian, K. H., Sederstrom, S.
- Evaluating Nonsampling Errors in a Study Comparing Data Collected by Mail and Using the Web; 2005; Lesser, V. M., Newton, L.
- Effectiveness of E-mail and Paper Mail Notifications for Internet Surveys; 2005; Ruggiere, P., Ver Duin, D'Arlene
- Transforming a Paper Survey into a Web-based Survey: Respondent Experiences; 2005; Luyegu, A.
- A Profile of Self-Selecting Web Respondents; 2005; Guerino, P.
- What's Up Doc? Mixing Web and Mail Methods in a Survey of Physicians; 2005; Beebe, T. J., Locke, G. R., Barnes, S. A.
- Predicting Smapled Respondents' Likelihood to Cooperate in a Mail Survey: Part III; 2005; Burks, A. T., Lavrakas, P. J., Bennett, M.
- Sound Bytes: Capturing Audio in Survey Interviews; 2005; Hansen, S. E., Krysan, M., Couper, M. P.
- (Inter) Net Gain? Experiments to Increase Web-Based Response; 2005; Tourkin, S., Cox, S., Parmer, R., Zukerberg, A.
- Does Type of Pre-Notification Affect Web Survey Response Rates?; 2005; Harmon, M., Westin, E., Levin, K.
- Did You Get The Message? Using E-Mail and SMS for Prenotification in Web Surveys; 2005; Neubarth, W., Bosnjak, M., Bandilla, W., Couper, M. P., Kaczmirek, L.
- Analysis of Break-off Patterns in Web Surveys; 2005; Ahsan, S., Broach, R. J.
- The Effect of Incentives on Two Physician Mail Surveys: A Response Rate Comparison; 2005; Christian, J.
- Value and Timing Strategies in Prize Draws: A Further Examination of the Immediacy Effect in Web Surveys...; 2005; Tuten, T. L., Galesic, M., Bosnjak, M.
- Comparative Analyses of Parallel Paper, Phone, and Web Surveys With and Without Incentives: What Differences...; 2005; Olsen, D., Call, V., Wygant, S.
- Characteristics Related to Cell Phone Status: Why Generation Y Should be Targeted; 2005; Hancock, L.
- Mode Effects for Hybrid Telephone/Internet Surveys and Reaching Cellphone-Only Households; 2005; Kulp, D., Herrmann, M., Dutwin, D., Lavine, S.
- In Search of Equivalency across Modes: Experimental Results Comparing Alternative Question Formats for...; 2005; Christian, L. M., Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D.
- Survey Mode Effects: Comparison between Telephone and Web; 2005; Speizer, H., Baker, R. P., Schneider, K.
