Web Survey Bibliography
Title Survey Administration Effects? A Comparison of Web-Based and Traditional Written Self-Administered Surveys Using the ISSP Environment Module
Author Bandilla, W., Bosnjak, M., Altdorfer, P.
Source Social Science Computer Review, 21, 2, pp. 235-243
Year 2003
Database Ingenta Select, SAGE Journals Online
Access date 07.05.2004
Abstract The module “environmental attitudes and values” of the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) was administered both as a paper-and-pencil questionnaire to a representative sample of the German population and as a web-based survey to an online access panel representative for German Internet users. The two samples differ significantly with regard to sociodemographic and substantive variables. An attempt to weight the data of the web-based sample on the basis of distribution characteristics of several sociodemographic variables resulted in rather inconsistent findings for the comparison of substantive items. However, if only respondents with similar education levels are compared, neither relevant differences in item means nor differences in selected interitem correlations are observable. This means that for high coverage groups (e.g., participants with a high education level), the data athered via the web are basically identical to those obtained in a traditional self-administered model.
Year of publication2003
Bibliographic typeJournal article
Web Survey Bibliography - Weighting & imputation (264)
- Intention to Participate in Web Surveys: An Extended TPB Model; 2007; Fang, J., Shao, P., Wan, J.
- The Usage of Magnitude Estimation Scales in Online Surveys - Results of a Joint Project; 2007; Althoff, S., Dumke, U.
- Calibration and Propensity Score Weighting in Web Surveys; 2007; Fabrizi, E., Biffignandi, S.
- Quality issues in online research; 2007; Sparrow, N.
- Comparison of Data Collection Procedures; 2007; Saris, W. E.
- The Effect of Changing Sample Composition on Time-Variation in Reported Business Conditions; 2007; van der Klaauw, W., Bram, J., Deitz, R., Orr, J., Topa, G.
- Perspektive Deutschland -- a Case Study of a Very Large Internet Survey; 2007; Boersch-Supan, A., Esner, D., Fassbender, H., Kiefer, R., McFadden, D., Winter, J.
- Are ‘Webographic' or Attitudinal Questions Useful for Adjusting Estimates from Web Surveys Using...; 2007; Schonlau, M., van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A.
- Development and Analysis of Joint Internet-Telephone Hunter Surveys; 2007; Lukacs, P. E.Lukacs, P. M.; de Rouvray, C.
- Peeping Over Computers The Slovenian Internet Audience Measurement Mix Model ; 2007; Cucin, P., Kropivnik, S., Hocevar, J.
- What's Missing from National RDD Surveys? The Impact of Growing Cell-Only Population.; 2007; Keeter, S., Kennedy, C., Tompson, T., Mokrzycki, M., Clark, A.
- Combining Cell Phone and Landline Samples: Dual Frame Approach.; 2007; ZuWallack, R. S.
- Statistics for real-life sample surveys: non-simple-random samples and weighted data; 2006; Dorofeev, S., Grant, P.
- Sample matching. Representative sampling from Internet panels; 2006; Rivers, D.
- A framework for survey breakoffs; 2006; Peytchev, A.
- Assessing Panel Bias in the Knowledge Networks Panel: Updated Results from 2005 Research ; 2006; Pineau, V., Nukulkij, P., Tang, X.
- Weighting an Internet Panel Survey on Drug Use and Abuse; 2006; Gordek, H., Williams, R. L., Dai, L.
- Supplementing RDD Surveys with Web-Based Survey Data; 2006; Krotki, K.
- Web Survey Methodology (WebSM) Portal; 2006; Lozar Manfreda, K., Vehovar, V.
- Propensity Score Adjustment as a Weighting Scheme for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys; 2006; Lee, Sunghee
- Selection Bias in Web Surveys and the Use of Propensity Scores; 2006; Schonlau, M., van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A., Couper, M. P.
- Comparing Internet Users and Nonusers’ Behavior toward Market Products; 2006; Diaz-Tena, N., Benford, R.
- Correcting for bias in a self-selected sample using a random sample as auxiliary information: the Dutch...; 2006; Oberski, D.
- The shift to on-line research. Managing and taking advantage of it.; 2006; Alexander, J., Fine, J., Davies, S.
- Make the Connection: Recruit for online surveys offline as well; 2006; Enright, A.
- Evaluating the Transition of an Ongoing RDD Survey to a Dual Mode-Dual Frame RDD/Internet Survey; 2006; Dutwin, D., Herrmann, M., Kulp, D., Lavine, S.
- Estimation in surveys with nonresponse; 2005; Sarndal, C.-E., Lundstrom, S.
- Does weighting for nonresponse increase the variance of survey means?; 2005; Little, R. J., Vartivarian, S.
- Comparing data from online and face-to-face surveys; 2005; Duffy, C., Smith, K., Terhanian, G., Bremer, J.
- Factors to Weigh When Considering Electronic Data Collection; 2005; Courtney, K. L., Craven, C. K.
- Thoughts on Internet Research in Europe; 2005; Harris Interactive
- Web surveys: inference using weighting and imputation in the survey on graduates; 2005; Biffignandi, S., Fabrizi, E., Pratesi, M., Salvati, N.
- The Use of Multiple Imputation to Create a Null Data Set from Nonrandomized Job Training Data; 2005; Rubin, D. B.
- Creative Applications of Selection Bias Modelling in Market Research; 2005; Terhanian, G., Bremer, J.
- Online-Access-Panels Based on Probability Samples: Can they Yield Representative Results?; 2005; Bandilla, W.
- Simple Approaches to Estimating the Variance of the Propensity Score Weighted Estimator Applied on Volunteer...; 2005; Isaksson, A., Lee, Sunghee; de Rouvray, C.
- Adjustment of Web Panel Survey Estimates by Regression Imputation; 2005; Varedian, M.
- Web surveys: inference using weighting and imputation in the survey on graduates; 2005; Biffignandi, S., Fabrizi, E., Pratesi, M., Salvati, N.
- Stated Preference Surveys on Internet – an Effective Method for Finding Passengers’ Preferences...; 2005; Nossum, A.
- Combining Information from Multiple Modes to Evaluate and Reduce Nonresponse Bias; 2005; Couper, M. P., Peytchev, A., Little, R. J., Strecher, V., Rothert, K.
- Simple Approaches to Estimating the Variance of the Propensity Score Weighted Estimator Applied on Volunteer...; 2005; Isaksson, A., Lee, Sunghee
- Variance Estimation for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys Using Propensity Score Adjustment and Calibration...; 2005; Lee, Sunghee, Valliant, R. L.
- Conducting representative online research. A summary of five years of learnings; 2005; Stenbjerre, M., Laugesen, J. N.
- Mode Effects for Hybrid Telephone/Internet Surveys and Reaching Cellphone-Only Households; 2005; Kulp, D., Herrmann, M., Dutwin, D., Lavine, S.
- Adjusting for selection bias in Web surveys using propensity scores: the case of the Health and Retirement...; 2005; Schonlau, M., van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A., Couper, M. P.
- How to make internet surveys representative: A case study of a two-step weighting procedure; 2004; Borsch-Supan, A. et al.
- Benchmarking Knowledge Networks’ Web-enabled panel survey of selected GSS questions against GSS...; 2004; Dennis, J. M., Li, R. J., Chatt, C.
- Propensity Score Adjustment As an Alternative Weighting Scheme for Web Survey Data; 2004; Lee, S.
- Attempting to adjust for selection bias in Web surveys with propensity scores: the case of the Health...; 2004; Schonlau, M., van Soest, A., Kapteyn, A., Couper, M. P., Winter, J.
- Sample Adjustment Weights for Internet Surveys: Restricted Access versus Voluntary Participation; 2004; Ayhan, H. O.