Web Survey Bibliography
Title College Student Responses to Web and Paper Surveys: Does Mode Matter?
Author Hayek, J. C., Ouimet, J. A., Carini, R. M., Kennedy, J. M., Kuh, G. D.
Source Research in Higher Education, 44, 1, pp. 1-19
Year 2003
Database Kluwer Journals
Access date 10.05.2004
Abstract We examined the responses of 58,288 college students to 8 scales involving 53 items from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to gauge whether individuals respond differently to surveys administered via the Web and paper. Multivariate regression analyses indicated that mode effects were generally small. However, students who completed the Web-based survey responded more favorably than paper on all 8 scales. These patterns generally held for both women and men, and younger and older students. Interestingly, the largest effect was found for a scale of items involving computing and information technology.
Access/Direct link Kluwer Journals (full text)
Year of publication2003
Bibliographic typeJournal article
Web Survey Bibliography - Research in Higher Education (9)
- Nonresponse and Online Student Evaluations of Teaching: Understanding the Influence of Salience...; 2012; Adams, M. J. D., Umbach, P. D.
- Using the Theory of Satisficing to Evaluate the Quality of Survey Data ; 2012; Barge, S., Gehlbach, H.
- Can Lottery Incentives Boost Web Survey Response Rates? Findings from Four Experiments; 2011; Laguilles, J. S., Saunders, D. B., Williams, E. A.
- Student Survey Response Rates across Institutions: Why Do they Vary?; 2006; Porter, S. R., Umbach, P. D.
- Comparability of Data Gathered from Evaluation Questionnaires on Paper and Through the Internet; 2005; Leung, D., Kember, D.
- College Student Responses to Web and Paper Surveys: Does Mode Matter?; 2003; Hayek, J. C., Ouimet, J. A., Carini, R. M., Kennedy, J. M., Kuh, G. D.
- Assessing Response Rates And Nonresponse Bias In Web And Paper Surveys; 2003; Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., Bryant, A. N.
- The Impact of Lottery Incentives on Student Survey Response Rates; 2003; Whitcomb, M. E., Porter, S. R.
- Electronic versus traditional student ratings of instruction; 1999; Layne B. H., DeCristoforo, J. R., McGinty, D.