Web survey bibliography (95)

Page:

• 1
• 2

• Virtual reality meets sensory research; 2017; Depoortere, L.
• Methods for Evaluating Respondent Attrition in Web-Based Surveys; 2016; Hochheimer, C. J.; Sabo, R. T.; Krist, A. H.; Day, T.; Cyrus, J.; Woolf, S. H.
• Exploration of Methods for Blending Unconventional Samples with Traditional Probability Samples; 2016; Gellar, J.; Zhou, H.; D.; Sinclair, M. D.
• Ratio of Vector Lengths as an Indicator of Sample Representativeness ; 2016; Shin, H. C.
• Online and Social Media Data As an Imperfect Continuous Panel Survey; 2016; Diaz, F.; Garmon, F.; Hofman, J. K.; Kiciman, E.; Rothschild, D.
• Validating self-reported mobile phone use in adults using a newly developed smartphone application; 2015; Goedhart, G., Kromhout, H., Wiart, J., Vermeulen, R.
• Innovative Uses of Paradata Across Diverse Contexts ; 2015; Cheung, G.; Pennell, B.-E.
• Build your own social network laboratory with Social Lab: a tool for research in social media; 2014; Garaizar, P., Reips, U.-D.
• Picking up the Bread Crumbs: Holistic Insights from Social Media; 2014; Souda, P.
• Survey optimisation considerations for Android, Apple and Windows 8 mobile devices; 2013; Owen, R.
• Second Life as a Survey Lab: Exploring the Randomized Response Technique in a Virtual Setting; 2013; Richards, A., Dean, E.
• Virtual Cognitive Interviewing Using Skype and Second Life; 2013; Dean, E., Head, B., Swicegood, J. E.
• Assessing Nonresponse Bias in the Green Technologies and Practices Survey; 2013; Meekins, B., Sverchkov, M., Stang, S.
• Why Big Data is a Small Idea…and Why You Shouldn’t Worry So Much; 2013; Needel, S.
• Doing real time research: Opportunities and challenges; 2013; Back, L., Lury, C., Zimmer, R.
• Digital technology and data collection; 2013; Henriksen, B., Jewitt, C., Price, S., Sakr, M.
• Effects of Self-Awareness on Disclosure During Skype Survey Interviews; 2013; Feuer, S., Schober, M. F.
• Cognitive Interviewing in Online Modes: a Comparison of Data Collected in Second Life and Skype; 2013; Swicegood, J. E., Head, B., Dean, E., Keating, M.
• Effects of Displaying Videos on Measurement in a Web Survey; 2013; Mendelson, J., Gibson, J. L., Romano Bergstrom, J. C.
• Classifying Mouse Movements to Predict Respondent Difficulty; 2013; Horwitz, R.
• Are You Seeing What I am Seeing? Exploring Response Option Visual Design Effects With Eye-Tracking; 2013; Libman, A., Smyth, J. D., Olson, K.
• Survey Reminder Method Experiment: An Examination of Cost Efficiency and Reminder Mode Salience in the...; 2013; Anderson, M., Rogers, B., CyBulski, K., Hall, J. W., Alderks, C. E., Milazzo-Sayre, L.
• Virtual research assistants: Replacing human interviewers by automated avatars in virtual worlds; 2013; Hasler, B. S., Tuchman, P., Friedman, D.
• From mixed-mode to multiple devices. Web surveys, smartphone surveys and apps: has the respondent gone...; 2013; Callegaro, M.
• Internet-Mediated Technologies and Mixed Methods Research; Problems and Prospects; 2012; Hesse-Biber, S.; Griffin, A. J.
• An Introduction to Using Video for Research; 2012; Jewitt, C.
• Online Surveys Aren't Just for Computers Anymore! Exploring Potential Mode Effects between Smartphone...; 2012; Buskirk, T. D., Andrus, C.
• Smartphone Apps and User Engagement: Collecting Data in the Digital Era; 2012; Link, M. W.
• Specific mixed-mode methodology to reach sensory disabled people in quantitative surveys; 2012; Fontaine, S.
• Facing The Future Webcams as a survey tool in China; 2012; Gordon, A., Llewellyn, T., Gu, E.
• Comfortable in the new medium: How online qual can benefit from our share-happy culture ; 2012; Rubenstein, P.
• Using Collaborative Web Technology to Construct the Health Information National Trends Survey; 2012; Moser, R. P., Beckjord, E. B., Finney Rutten, L. J., Blake, K., Hesse, B. W.
• The Representativity of Web Surveys of the General Population compared to Traditional Modes and Mixed...; 2012; Klausch, L. T., Schouten, B., Hox, J.
• Time use data collection using Smartphones: Results of a pilot study among experienced and inexperienced...; 2012; Scherpenzeel, A., Sonck, N., Fernee, H., Morren, Me.
• Using Webinar Polls to Collect Online Survey Data: The Case of a Behavioral Finance Problem; 2012; Sahu, C.
• The Game Experiments: Researching how gaming techniques can be used to improve the quality of feedback...; 2011; Sleep, D., Puleston, J.
• The benefits and constraints of e-mail interviews and discussions as methods of accessing valid data; 2011; Roberts, An.
• Facial imaging: The new face of online survey research; 2011; Gordon, A., McCallum, D., Sorci, M., Llewellyn, T.
• On Affordances and Technological Intersubjectivity; 2011; Vatrapu, R.
• Building online communities; 2011; Mlačić, B., Milas, G., Mikloušić, I.
• Eye Tracking in testing questionnaires: What’s the added value?; 2011; Tries, S.
• Video enhanced web survey; 2011; Fuchs, M., Kunz, T., Gebhard, F.
• Engagement, Consistency, Reach – why the Technology Landscape Precludes All Three; 2011; Johnson, A., Rolfe, G.
• Twitter mood predicts the stock market.; 2011; Bollen, J., Mao, H., Zeng, X.-J.
• Web based CATI on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud and VirtualBox using queXS; 2011; Zammit, A.
• Web/Cloud Based CATI Using queXS; 2011; Zammit, A.
• Partnership-Driven Resources to Improve and Enhance Research (PRIMER): A Survey of Community-Engaged...; 2011; Dolor, R. J., Greene, S. M., Thompson, E., Baldwin, L.-M., Neale, A. V.
• Weaving the Web into Personal Communication Networks: A Mobile Phone Based Study of Smartphone Users; 2011; Kobayashi, T., Boase, J.
• Different functioning of rating scale formats – results from psychometric and physiological experiments...; 2011; Koller, M., Salzberger, T.
• Measurement invariance in training evaluation: Old question, new context; 2011; P., Gissel, A., Stoughton, J. W., Whelan, T. J.Clark, A. P.

Page:

• 1
• 2