Web Survey Bibliography
RESEARCH QUESTION
Since it gets more difficult to compensate panel mortality with the recruitment of fresh panelists, panel maintenance is becoming more and more important. The challenge is to increase panelists’ commitment by basically giving them more positive experiences than negative ones. Probably one of the worst experiences panelists can have is being frequently screened out, as the shown willingness to participate leads to immediate disappointment. The application of a master screener helps to preselect panelists more precisely and thus to sustain panelists’ commitment. In our contribution, we would like to present first evidencesthat the use of a master screener not only improves panel performance, but furthermorealso has a positive impact on data quality.
METHODS
In our case study, we compared two groups of panel members. The first group had been pre-selected for each study by participating in a master screener, while the second group had been screened separately after entering each survey. In a common survey without screening conditions both groups are asked to answer the same questions. Our comparison of both groups extends over indicators of panel performance like response-rate and break-off-rate, but also on data quality and user feedback. Differences in these variables are assumed to be caused by the experience of participation in the master screener.
RESULTS
In both groups overall satisfaction with panel membership is correlated with the subjectively perceived frequency of survey termination. Participants in the Masterscreener were more satisfied with the frequency of termination, as well as with other aspects of panel membership. Therefore, we expect a confounding influence of three variables on the perceived frequency of termination. Regarding the probability of participating in further surveys and recommending the panel-membership, the participants in the Masterscreener had a more positive attitude. The observed differences between both groups make us confident, that we will be able to identify further positive effects inthe intermediate and long term.
ADDED VALUE
Our case study sheds some light on the effects of a master screener on the intermediateterm(e.g. data quality, response rates, satisficing behaviour) and in the longterm(panelist commitment, panel mortality).
Conference Homepage (abstract)
Web survey bibliography (4086)
- The Best of Both Worlds: Utilizing Best Practices From Web and Survey Design ; 2016; Libman Barry, A.; Langer Tesfaye, C.; Levy, J.
- Characterizing Satisficers in Web Surveys Using Paradata to Target Interventions; 2016; Vetting, S. S.; Horwitz, R.; Bray, R.; Hernandez Vivier, A.; Tancreto, J.; Reiser, C.
- A Closer Look at Response Time Outliers in Online S urveys Using Paradata Survey Focus ; 2016; Schlosser, S.; Hoehne, J. K.
- Exploring Mode Effects Between Smartphone and Perso nal Computer Mode of Administration of a National...; 2016; Fahrney Wiant, K.; Richards, A.; Zimmer, S.; Mayclin, D.
- Response Order Effects on a Web Survey of Nurse Pra ctitioners ; 2016; Quintana, G.; Riley, L. E.
- Using Paradata to Identify Questions with High Resp ondent Burden for Improvement in Future Surveys ; 2016; Powell, R.Richards, A.Yu, S.Brackbill, R.
- Investigating Cognitive Effort of Response Formats in Web Surveys using Paradata ; 2016; Hoehne, J. K.; Schlosser, S.; Krebs, D.
- Assessing the Effects and Effectiveness of Attention-check Questions in Web Surveys: Evidence From a...; 2016; Vannette, D.
- Conducting Survey Experiments Using an Online Labor Market ; 2016; Fowler, S.; Willis, G. B.; Moser, R. P.; Townsend, R. L. M.; Maitland, A.; Sun, H.; Ferrer, R.; Berrigan...
- Mode Effect on Racial Sensitive Questions between W eb and Computer-assisted Self-interview ; 2016; Liu, M.; Wang, Y.; Lepkowski, J. M.
- A Test of Web/PAPI Protocols and Incentives for the Residential Energy Consumption Survey ; 2016; Biemer, P. P.; Murphy, J.; Zimmer, S.; Berry, J.; Lewis, K.; Shaofen, D.
- Mode Effects in American Trends Panel: Bayesian Analysis of a Cross-classified Item-person Mixed Model...; 2016; Gill, Je.; Kolenikov, S.; McGeeney, K.
- Mobile Device Use in Web Surveys Among College Students: Predictors and Consequences for Data Quality...; 2016; Beach, S.; Musa, D.; Strotmeyer, S.; Schlarb, J.
- Mode Effects on Subjective Well-being Research: Do they Affect Regression Coefficients? ; 2016; Sanchez Tome, R.; Roberts, C.; Staehli, M. E.; Joye, D.
- Effects of an Initial Offering of Multiple Survey Response Options on Response Rates; 2016; Steele, E. A.; Marlar, J.; Allen, L.; Kanitkar, K. N.
- How to Invite? Methods for Increasing Internet Surv ey Response Rate ; 2016; Huang, A. R.; Noel, H.; Hargraves, L.
- The Mobile Web Only Population: Socio-demographic Characteristics and Potential Bias ; 2016; Fuchs, M.; Metzler, A.
- Unintentional Mobile Respondents in Official Statis tics and Their Effect on Data Quality ; 2016; Bakker, J.
- Evaluating a Modular Design Approach to Collecting Survey Data Using Text Messages ; 2016; West, B. T.; Ghimire, D.; Axinn, W.
- Testing Web-Based Survey Measures of Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation Using Mark-All-That-Apply...; 2016; Brenner, P.; Bulgar - Medina, J.
- Mode and Eligibility Rates in a Dual-mode Web and Mail Survey ; 2016; Ventura, I.; Bilgen, I.; Stern, M. J.
- The Impact of Response Scale Direction on Survey Responses in a Mixed-mode Survey ; 2016; Hu, M.; Yan, T.; Keusch, F.
- Examining Trends in the Presence of Survey Mode Effects ; 2016; Hisako Kitada, H.; Lesser, V. M.
- Best Practice Instrument & Communications Evaluation: An Examination of the NSCH Redesign ; 2016; Higgins, W. B.; Welch, R.; Tortora, R. D.; Vladutiu, C. J.
- The Effect of Respondent Commitment and Tailored Fe edback on Response Quality in an Online Survey ; 2016; Cibelli Hibben, K.; Conrad, F. G.
- Effectiveness of Messaging to Encourage Response to the ACS ; 2016; Fulton, J.; Hunter Childs, J. E.; Morales, G.
- Reaching the Mobile Generation: Reducing Web Survey Non-response through SMS Reminders ; 2016; Kanitkar, K. N.; Marlar, J.
- The Effect of Using Text Messages for Survey Invitations and Reminders ; 2016; McGeeney, K.; Yan, H. Y.
- "Don't be Afraid ... We're Researchers!": The Impact of Informal Contact Language...; 2016; Foster, K. N.; Hagemeier, N. E.; Alamain, A. A.; Pack, R.; Sevak, R. J.
- Does Embedding a Survey Question in the Survey Invi tation E-mail Affect Response Rates? Evidence from...; 2016; Vannette, D.
- Mode Effects in Electoral Polls: A Comparative Perspective ; 2016; Durand, C.
- Safety First: Ensuring the Anonymity and Privacy of Iranian Panellists’ While Creating Iran...; 2016; Farmanesh, A.; Mohseni, E.
- Novel Methodology for Reaching a Statewide Represen tative Sample of Youth Ages 12-18 ; 2016; Freedner-Maguire, N.; ZuWallack, R. S.
- Communication Channels that Predict and Mediate Self-response ; 2016; Walejko, G. K.
- Encouraging Online Response among Hard-to-Survey Po pulations: Digital Advertising and Influencer Calls...; 2016; Bates, N.; Virgile, M.
- ...; 2016; Mccaffrey, K. M.; Otmany, J.; Hagedorn, S.
- Simulating a Census Environment to Test Online Self -response ; 2016; Vines, M.
- Using a Response Propensity Model to Allocate Non-c ontingent Incentives in a Web Panel ; 2016; Masterton, M.
- Promoting Participation in Web Surveys; 2016; Hupp, A.; Chan, W.
- Does Asking for Linkage Consent in the Beginning of the Questionnaire Affect Respondents' Answers...; 2016; Haas, G. C.; Eckman, S.
- Implications of Response Device Type for Sensitive Web Surveys: Examining Data Quality and Respondent...; 2016; C.; Richards, A.; C.; Peterson, K.; Smith, A. C.
- Influence of Multiple Factors on Response Rate; 2016; Chaney,B.H.; Chaney, B. H.; Kindlon, A.
- What’s Your Number? Evaluating the Success of Telep hone Number Acquisition Via Record Match,...; 2016; Linville, J. C.; Carley- R.; Carley- R.; Grant, D. B.; Carley- R.; Jans, M.; Carley- R.; Park, R.; Becker...
- Tracking the Representativeness of an Online Panel Over Time ; 2016; Klausch, L. T.; Scherpenzeel, A.
- Can Using a Mixed Mode Approach Improve the Representativeness and Data Quality in Panel Surveys?; 2016; Stern, M. J.
- Surveying American Indian and Alaska Native Parents : Identifying Characteristics of Survey Mode Preference...; 2016; Feeney, K.; Masters, F.
- The Impact of Scale Direction, Alignment and Length on Responses to Rating Scale Questions in a Web...; 2016; Keusch, F.; Liu, M.; Yan, T.
- Pre-election Surveys Using a Multi-modal Interviewing Strategy ; 2016; Redman, J.; Thompson, Sc.; Yost, B.
- Methods for Detecting Telescoping Error in a Cross- sectional Web Design Survey ; 2016; Shook-Sa, B. E.; Berzofsky, M.; Peterson, K.; Lindquist, C.; Krebs, C.
- Introduction Breakoffs, Questionnaire Breakoffs and Web Questionnaire Length: A Metastudy ; 2016; Cehovin, G.; Vehovar, V.