Web Survey Bibliography
Internet-based experiments are characterized by the physical absence of an experimenter and the difficulty to provide a standardized experimental arrangement. How does this affect internal validity and precision? Three experiments on different psychological questions, following studies by Heider and Simmel (1944), Morris and Stevens (1974), and Moyer (1973), were conducted in the virtual laboratory Lab.OR. To different degrees each of the selected experiments demanded commitment of participants and features measurements, which are usually considered susceptible to external disturbances. Each experiment was conducted as an Internet-based experiment and, using WLAN-notebooks, additionally in two other settings (laboratory rooms / public rest areas on campus), so that the degree of standardization of the experimental arrangement was varied. While the experimenter was virtually present in the Internet-based experiments, the kind of physical presence of the experimenter was varied in the laboratory and campus settings: either he was actively involved and gave oral instructions, or he just attended the experiment, but did not play an active part while all information was provided on the computer's screen.
Results show that all experiments provide equally valid and precise results, independent of setting or mode of presence of the experimenter. Taking into account the different psychological variables studied in the different experiments, some interesting effects were found: Participants' performance was affected by the kind of presence of the experimenter, when they had to write an elaborate report, but not when response latencies or recall rates were obtained. Lack of standardization of the environment did only affect response rates: performance in laboratory and Internet settings was superior to campus setting.
Implications for experimental online research and the potential of using the virtual laboratory Lab.OR in teaching experimental psychology to point out methodological specifics of online-experiments conducted in different settings are discussed.
Journal Homepage (abstract) / (full text)
Web survey bibliography (4086)
- Web-based survey techniques. A synthesis of Transit practice; 2006
- Web 2.0 & panels. The shift from lectures to conversations; 2006; Cook, M., Buckley, N.
- Understanding people. Sample matching; 2006; Rivers, D.
- The power of the visible: Visual design for Web surveys; 2006; Couper, M. P.
- The internet response method: Impact on the Canadian Census of population data; 2006; Roy, L., Laroche, D.
- The effect of conditioning when re-interviewing; 2006; Cartwright, T., Nancarrow, C.
- The anonymous elect. Market research through online access panels; 2006; Postoaca, A.
- Statistics for real-life sample surveys: non-simple-random samples and weighted data; 2006; Dorofeev, S., Grant, P.
- Sample matching. Representative sampling from Internet panels; 2006; Rivers, D.
- Research quality: The next MR industry challenge; 2006; Dedeker, K.
- Optimizing quality in the use of web-based and computer based testing for personnel selection; 2006; Hornke, L. F., Kersting, M.
- Online marketing research; 2006; Miller, J.
- Need for high quality auxiliary data service for improving the quality of editing and imputation...; 2006; Laaksonen, S.
- Microsoft sues testing material vendors; 2006; Johnston, S. J.
- Introduction to the Special Issue on the ITC - Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing...; 2006; Coyne, I., Bartram, D.
- International Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing; 2006
- How successful I am depends on what number I get: The effects of numerical scale labels and need for...; 2006; Yan, T.
- Greenfield unveils real-time sampling; 2006
- Global market research 2006; 2006
- F-Shaped pattern for reading web content; 2006; Nielsen, J.
- Blocked versus randomized format of questionnaires. A confirmatory multigroup analysis; 2006; Sparfeldt, J. R., Schilling, S. R., Rost, D. H., Rost, D. H., Thiel, A.
- Benefits and challenges of multi-sourcing. Understanding differences between sample sources; 2006; de Gaudemar, O.
- Behavioral self-report measures. International extensions; 2006; Thomas, R. K., Klein, J. D.
- Attitudinal differences. Comparing people who belong to multiple versus single panels; 2006; Casdas, D., Fine, B., Menictas, C.
- Assessing individual respondents' quality. An innovative scoring system; 2006; Loeb, C.,Hartmann, A.
- Assessing Panel Bias in the Knowledge Networks Panel: Updated Results from 2005 Research ; 2006; Pineau, V., Nukulkij, P., Tang, X.
- A Critical Assessment of Online Survey Tools; 2006; Marra, R. M., Bogue, B.
- A dynamic technique for conducting online survey-based research; 2006; Bonometti, R. J., Tang, J.
- The 2006 Confirmit Annual MR Software Survey; 2006; Macer, T., Wilson, S.
- Online community survey: an effectiveness measure for revealing citizen preferences in their role as...; 2006; Martin Juanil, D., Ismail, M.
- Blaise – Alive and kicking for 20 years; 2006; Bethlehem, J., Hofman, L.
- Physical or Virtual Presence of the Experimenter: Psychological Online-Experiments in Different Settings...; 2006; Ollesch, H., Heineken, E., Schulte, F. P.
- Roadmap for accessible rich Internet applications (Wai-ARIA Roadmap); 2006; Schwerdtfeger, R., Gunderson, J., Mueller, J. C.
- Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution...; 2006; Blumberg, S. J., Luke, J. V., Cynamon, M. C.
- Using the Internet for Surveys and Research ; 2006; Eysenbach, G.
- Web-based Surveys in Logistics Research: An Empirical Application; 2006; Grant, D. B., Teller, C., Teller, W.
- Web-Based Surveys: Respondents vs. Nonrespondents; 2006; Uriell, Z. A., Rosenfeld, P., Schultz, R.
- Eye-Movement Analysis of a Web Survey; 2006; Redline, C. D., Hunfalvay,M., Lankford, C.
- Web-Based Consent Form Design: An Experiment with Two Populations; 2006; Crawford, S. D., Eisenberg, D., Wimsatt, L., Golberstein, E.
- Using Interactive Web-Based Maps; 2006; Sinibaldi, J., Showen, S., Crawford, S. D., Saltz, R.
- Boosting Response Rates: Are There Optimal Times to E-mail Respondents?; 2006; Wood, E. W., O'Brien, J., Levin, K., Heller, T. H.
- Cell Phone Samples: Who Are We Missing?; 2006; Purcell, K., Best, J., Rainie, L., Horrigan, J.
- Geographic Controls in a Cell Phone Sample; 2006; Fleeman, A., Estersohn, D.
- Cell Phones in List-Assisted, RDD Sample; 2006; Ivie, K., Pels, R., Zentrichova, D.
- Effects of Cell Phones in Land-Line Households; 2006; Lambries, D., Oldendick, R. W., Link, M. W.
- Mixed Modes and Mode Effects: Focus on the Web; 2006; Lewis, L., Zandberg, I., Kleiner, B.
- Web and Mail Surveys: A Mode Test; 2006; Stringfellow, V. L., Roman, A. M.
- Supplementing RDD Surveys with Web Data; 2006; Krotki, K.
- Respondent Mode Preference in a Multimode Survey; 2006; Selfa, L., Sederstrom, S.
- Using Filtered Questions to Improve Rating Scales; 2006; Myers, K.