Web Survey Bibliography
In the last two decades, Web or Internet surveys have had a profound impact on the survey world. The change has been felt mostly strongly in the market research sector, with many companies switching from telephone surveys or other modes of data collection to online surveys. The academic and public policy/social attitude sectors were a little slower to adopt, being more careful about evaluating the effect of the change on key surveys and trends, and conducting research on how best to design and implement Web surveys. The public sector (i.e., government statistical offices) has been the slowest to embrace Web surveys, in part because the stakes are much higher, both in terms of the precision requirements of the estimates and in terms of the public scrutiny of such data. However, National Statistical Offices (NSOs) are heavily engaged in research and development with regard to Web surveys, mostly notably as part of a mixedmode data collection strategy, or in the establishment survey world, where repeated measurement and quick turnaround are the norm. Along with the uneven progress in the adoption of Web surveys has come a number of concerns about the method, particularly with regard to the representational or inferential aspects of Web surveys. At the same time, a great deal of research has been conducted on the measurement side of Web surveys, developing ways to improve the quality of data collected using this medium. This seminar focuses on these two key elements of Web surveys — inferential issues and measurement issues. Each of these broad areas will be covered in turn in the following sections. The inferential section is largely concerned with methods of sampling for Web surveys, and the associated coverage and nonresponse issues. Different ways in which samples are drawn, using both non-probability and probability-based approaches, are discussed. The assumptions behind the different approaches to inference in Web surveys, the benefits and risks inherent in the different approaches, and the appropriate use of particular approaches to sample selection in Web surveys, are reviewed. The following section then addresses a variety of issues related to the design of Web survey instruments, with a review of the empirical literature and practical recommendations for design to minimize measurement error.
A total survey error framework (see Deming, 1944; Kish, 1965; Groves, 1989) is useful for evaluating the quality or value of a method of data collection such as Web or Internet surveys. In this framework, there are several different sources of error in surveys, and these can be divided into two main groups: errors of non-observation and errors of observation. Errors of nonobservation refer to failures to observe or measure eligible members of the population of interest, and can include coverage errors, sampling errors, and nonresponse errors. Errors of nonobservation are primarily concerned about issues of selection bias. Errors of observation are also called measurement errors (see Biemer et al., 1991; Lessler and Kalsbeeck, 1992). Sources of measurement error include the respondent, the instrument, the mode of data collection and (in interviewer-administered surveys) the interviewer. In addition, processing errors can affect all types of surveys. Errors can also be classified according to whether they affect the variance or bias of survey estimates, both contributing to overall mean square error (MSE) of a survey statistic. A total survey error perspective aims to minimize mean square error for a set of survey statistics, given a set of resources. Thus, cost and time are also important elements in evaluating the quality of a survey. While Web surveys generally are significantly less expensive than other modes of data collection, and are quicker to conduct, there are serious concerns raised about errors of non-observation or selection bias. On the other hand, there is growing evidence that using Web surveys can improve the quality of the data collected (i.e., reduce measurement errors) relative to other modes, depending on how the instruments are designed. Given this framework, we first discuss errors of non-observation or selection bias that may raise concerns about the inferential value of Web surveys, particularly those targeted at the general population. Then in the second part we discuss ways that the design of the Web survey instrument can affect measurement errors.
EUSTAT Homepage (abstract) / (full text)
Web survey bibliography - Couper, M. P. (93)
- Reducing speeding in web surveys by providing immediate feedback; 2017; Conrad, F.; Tourangeau, R.; Couper, M. P.; Zhang, C.
- Effects of Mobile versus PC Web on Survey Response Quality: a Crossover Experiment in a Probability...; 2017; Antoun, C.; Couper, M. P.; G. G.Conrad, F. G.
- Helping respondents provide good answers in Web surveys; 2016; Couper, M. P.; Zhang, C.
- Device use in web surveys: The effect of differential incentives; 2016; Mavletova, A. M.; Couper, M. P.
- Why Do Web Surveys Take Longer on Smartphones?; 2016; Couper, M. P.; J. J.Peterson, G. J.
- Assessment of Innovations in Data Collection Technology for Understanding Society; 2016; Couper, M. P.
- Options for Fielding and Analyzing Web Surveys; 2016; Schonlau, M.; Couper, M. P.
- Internet and Smartphone Coverage in a National Health Survey: Implications for Alternative Modes; 2015; Couper, M. P.; Kelley, J.; Axinn, W.; Guyer, H.; Wagner, J.; West, B. T.
- A Meta-Analysis of Breakoff Rates in Mobile Web Surveys; 2015; Mavletova, A. M.; Couper, M. P.
- Comparing a Cell Phone Survey and a Web Survey of University Students ; 2015; Couper, M. P.; Kim, S.; Woo, Y.
- The Effect of Mobile Web Survey Design on Screen Orientation Manipulation; 2014; Young, R.H.; Crawford, S. D.; Couper, M. P.; Nelson, T. F.
- Nonprobability Web Surveys to Measure Sexual Behaviors and Attitudes in the General Population: A Comparison...; 2014; Erens, B.; Burkill, S.; Couper, M. P.; C., Clifton, S., Tanton, C., Phelps, A., Datta, J., Mercer,...
- The Effectiveness of Mailed Invitations for Web Surveys and the Representativeness of Mixed-Mode versus...; 2014; Bandilla, W., Couper, M. P., Kaczmirek, L.
- The Grouping of Items in Mobile Web Surveys; 2014; Mavletova, A. M., Couper, M. P.
- Social Media and Surveys: Collaboration, Not Competition; 2014; Couper, M. P.
- Mobile-Mostly Internet Users and Noncoverage in Traditional Web Surveys ; 2013; Antoun, C.; Couper, M. P.
- How well do volunteer web panel surveys measure sensitive behaviours in the general population, and...; 2013; Erens, B., Burkill, S., Copas, A., Couper, M. P., Conrad, F.
- Research Note: Reducing the Threat of Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys?; 2013; Couper, M. P.
- Is the Sky Falling? New Technology, Changing Media, and the Future of Surveys; 2013; Couper, M. P.
- The Effectiveness of Mailed Invitations for Web Surveys; 2013; Bandilla, W., Couper, M. P., Kaczmirek, L.
- Sensitive Topics in PC and Mobile Web Surveys; 2013; Mavletova, A. M., Couper, M. P.
- Surveys on Mobile Devices: Opportunities and Challenges; 2013; Couper, M. P.
- Informed Consent for Web Paradata Use; 2013; Couper, M. P., Singer, E.
- Sample composition discrepancies in different stages of a probability-based online panel; 2013; Bosnjak, M., Haas, I., Galesic, M., Kaczmirek, L., Bandilla, W., Couper, M. P.
- Sensitive topics in PC Web and mobile web surveys: Is there a difference? (presentation); 2012; Mavletova, A. M., Couper, M. P.
- Using paradata to explore item-level response times in surveys; 2012; Couper, M. P., Kreuter, F.
- Data Quality in HIV/AIDS Web-Based Surveys: Handling Invalid and Suspicious Data; 2012; Bauermeister, J. A., Pingel, E., Zimmerman, M., Couper, M. P., Carballo-Diéguez, A., Strecher, V. J.
- Database Lookup in Web Surveys; 2012; Couper, M. P., Zhang, C., Conrad, F. G., Tourangeau, R.
- Using Text-to-Speech (TTS) for Audio-CASI; 2012; Couper, M. P., Kirgis, N., Buageila, S., Berglund, P.
- Reducing the Threat of Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys; 2012; Couper, M. P.
- Web Survey Methodology: Interface Design, Sampling and Statistical Inference; 2011; Couper, M. P.
- The Future of Modes of Data Collection; 2011; Couper, M. P.
- The Uses of Open-Ended Questions in Quantitative Surveys; 2011; Singer, E., Couper, M. P.
- Effects of Response Formats when Measuring Attitudes in Consumer Web Surveys Across Markets.; 2011; Couper, M. P., Nunge, E.
- Should I Stay or Should I go: The Effects of Progress Feedback, Promised Task Duration, and Length of...; 2011; Yan, T., Conrad, F. G., Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P.
- Can Verbal Instructions Counteract Visual Context Effects in Web Surveys?; 2011; Toepoel, V., Couper, M. P.
- The use of paradata to monitor and manage survey data collection; 2010; Kreuter, F., Couper, M. P., Lyberg, L. E.
- Research synthesis. AAPOR report on online panels; 2010; Brick, J. M., Baker, R., Blumberg, S. J., Couper, M. P., Courtright, M., Dennis, J. M., Dillman, D....
- Communicating Disclosure Risk in Informed Consent Statements; 2010; Singer, E., Couper, M. P.
- Professional Web Respondents and Data Quality; 2010; Conrad, F. G., Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., Zhang, C.
- Increasing Respondents' Use of Definitions in Web Surveys; 2010; Peytchev, A., Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R.
- Internet surveys; 2010; Couper, M. P., Bosnjak, M.
- Visual design in online surveys: Lessons for the mobile world; 2010; Couper, M. P.
- Interactive Interventions in Web Surveys Can Increase Respondent Conscientiousness; 2009; Conrad, F. G., Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., Kennedy, C.
- Using Debit Cards for Incentive Payments: Experiences of a Weekly Survey Study; 2009; Gatny, H. H., Couper, M. P., Axinn, W., Barber, J. S.
- Ethical Considerations in the Use of Paradata in Web Surveys; 2009; Couper, M. P., Singer, E.
- Interactive feedback can improve accuracy of responses in web surveys; 2009; Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., Galesic, M.
- Pictures in Web Surveys; 2009; Toepoel, V., Couper, M. P.
- Response Order and Response Distributions: The Format of the Response Options in a Web Survey; 2009; Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Balter, O.
- Improving the Design of Complex Matrix Questions; 2009; Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G.