Web Survey Bibliography
This paper addresses the representativeness of panellists who are in multiple panels as compared to those in one or a limited number of panels. In assessing data received from respondents on only one, a few, multiple panels and comparing the same data with information collected by CATI., we found major differences in the attitudes of those who participate on multiple panels, while the demographics may be similar, as compared with others in only one panel.
Homepage (Abstract)
Web survey bibliography - ESOMAR (16)
- 28 Questions to Help Buyers of Online Samples; 2015; Cape, P. J.; Phillips, A.; Baker, R.; Cooke, M.; Ribeiro, E.; Terhanian, G.
- Global market research 2013; 2013
- Global market research 2012; 2012
- New Esomar survey on use of cookies and tracking technologies; 2011
- Global market research 2011; 2011
- 26 questions to help research buyers of online samples; 2008
- Using global online panels; 2008; Pearson, C., Smith, E., Ridlen, R., Zhang, H., Cooper, A
- The quest for on-line quality research; 2008; Rhall, T., Fine, B.
- ICC/ESOMAR International code on market and social research; 2007
- Global market research 2007; 2007
- Web 2.0 & panels. The shift from lectures to conversations; 2006; Cook, M., Buckley, N.
- The effect of conditioning when re-interviewing; 2006; Cartwright, T., Nancarrow, C.
- Global market research 2006; 2006
- Benefits and challenges of multi-sourcing. Understanding differences between sample sources; 2006; de Gaudemar, O.
- Attitudinal differences. Comparing people who belong to multiple versus single panels; 2006; Casdas, D., Fine, B., Menictas, C.
- Assessing individual respondents' quality. An innovative scoring system; 2006; Loeb, C.,Hartmann, A.